Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Just repulsive. 13:21 - Nov 17 with 889 viewscatch74

Go-between paid £21m in taxpayer funds for NHS PPE https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54974373

Poll: Who are the Numbskulls?

0
Just repulsive. on 13:24 - Nov 17 with 855 viewsKeno

Indeed!!

If they had asked I would have done that for £17mill and saved the country £4mill

Poll: Should Hoppy renew his season ticket
Blog: [Blog] My World Cup Reflections

0
Just repulsive. on 13:39 - Nov 17 with 820 viewsHARRY10

""We do not understand why, as late as June, government was still making direct awards of contracts sufficiently lucrative as to enable these sorts of profits to be made," Jolyon Maugham, the project's director told the BBC.

"The real criticism that is to be made here is of the huge profits that government allows to be generated."

This is not the first time concerns have been raised about PPE contracts the DHSC signed during the first wave of the coronavirus pandemic.

Earlier this year, the BBC revealed that 50 million face masks the government bought could not be used in the NHS because of safety concerns. And last week, it exposed concerns that the government had leaned on safety officials to certify PPE which had been wrongly classified."


Had the government heeded te advice from the Cygnus exercise there would not have been any PPE shortage when the outbreak took hold in February.

They inherited a fully prepared and equipped NHS (in 2010), ready for this type of pandemic - but chose to run down and not replace needed equipment as part of their lunatic austerity programme.
1
Just repulsive. on 14:27 - Nov 17 with 770 viewsTrequartista

He looks a bit like a young Craig Forrest

Poll: Who do you blame for our failure to progress?

0
Just repulsive. on 09:30 - Nov 22 with 576 viewscatch74

Just repulsive. on 13:39 - Nov 17 by HARRY10

""We do not understand why, as late as June, government was still making direct awards of contracts sufficiently lucrative as to enable these sorts of profits to be made," Jolyon Maugham, the project's director told the BBC.

"The real criticism that is to be made here is of the huge profits that government allows to be generated."

This is not the first time concerns have been raised about PPE contracts the DHSC signed during the first wave of the coronavirus pandemic.

Earlier this year, the BBC revealed that 50 million face masks the government bought could not be used in the NHS because of safety concerns. And last week, it exposed concerns that the government had leaned on safety officials to certify PPE which had been wrongly classified."


Had the government heeded te advice from the Cygnus exercise there would not have been any PPE shortage when the outbreak took hold in February.

They inherited a fully prepared and equipped NHS (in 2010), ready for this type of pandemic - but chose to run down and not replace needed equipment as part of their lunatic austerity programme.



Poll: Who are the Numbskulls?

0
Just repulsive. on 11:35 - Nov 22 with 526 viewsDarth_Koont

Just repulsive. on 09:30 - Nov 22 by catch74



For some reason in the UK the whole system seems to put middlemen at the top of the economic pyramid. It’s probably an indictment of our economy that is predominantly a middleman/wealth management structure with a bit of tech innovation and engineering/manufacturing sprinkled in.

But really amazing that we reward this “wealth skimming” at a time when the emphasis should be on those that make things and/or know what they’re doing sourcing them.

Pronouns: He/Him

0
Just repulsive. on 12:42 - Nov 22 with 495 viewscatch74

Just repulsive. on 11:35 - Nov 22 by Darth_Koont

For some reason in the UK the whole system seems to put middlemen at the top of the economic pyramid. It’s probably an indictment of our economy that is predominantly a middleman/wealth management structure with a bit of tech innovation and engineering/manufacturing sprinkled in.

But really amazing that we reward this “wealth skimming” at a time when the emphasis should be on those that make things and/or know what they’re doing sourcing them.


I wonder who will be burdened with the tax hikes next year too?
The one sensible option I’ve heard from Sunak is online sales (we somehow need to exempt smaller businesses from this) - Amazon must have hit the jackpot this year.

Poll: Who are the Numbskulls?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024