Quantcast
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
What a strike that was!! (n/t) 18:58 - Jan 9 with 485 viewsChrisd


Poll: Where are we going to finish?

1

What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 18:59 - Jan 9 with 471 viewsScuzzer

Flipping Dozzell....you're a midfielder closecthe man down you twit!

Established 1968

-1

What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 18:59 - Jan 9 with 453 viewsm14_blue

Ridiculous goal.
0
What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 19:00 - Jan 9 with 451 viewsStokieBlue

What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 18:59 - Jan 9 by Scuzzer

Flipping Dozzell....you're a midfielder closecthe man down you twit!


You moaned about Dozzell earlier as well.

Not entirely sure he should be the vector of your moaning, that was a fabulous strike. Yes he had too much room but usually it wouldn't result in a goal. Not even sure it was his man, he turned in from the wing - not sure Dozzell can sprint across that quickly.

SB
[Post edited 9 Jan 19:00]

“You may not feel outstandingly robust, but if you are an average-sized adult you will contain within your modest frame no less than 7 X 10^18 joules of potential energy—enough to explode with the force of thirty very large hydrogen bombs, assuming you knew how to liberate it and really wished to make a point."

0

What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 19:00 - Jan 9 with 386 viewshatch

Can’t complain. Great goal and no one really at fault. Big ask now.
0
What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 19:03 - Jan 9 with 331 viewsbluefunk

What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 19:00 - Jan 9 by StokieBlue

You moaned about Dozzell earlier as well.

Not entirely sure he should be the vector of your moaning, that was a fabulous strike. Yes he had too much room but usually it wouldn't result in a goal. Not even sure it was his man, he turned in from the wing - not sure Dozzell can sprint across that quickly.

SB
[Post edited 9 Jan 19:00]


Sorry Dozzell was at fault there, he gave the man time to take a touch and set himself, made no attempt to rush him, while he couldn’t have forecast the goal that has been typical of Dozzell when he isn’t on his game
0
What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 19:03 - Jan 9 with 314 viewsScuzzer

What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 19:00 - Jan 9 by StokieBlue

You moaned about Dozzell earlier as well.

Not entirely sure he should be the vector of your moaning, that was a fabulous strike. Yes he had too much room but usually it wouldn't result in a goal. Not even sure it was his man, he turned in from the wing - not sure Dozzell can sprint across that quickly.

SB
[Post edited 9 Jan 19:00]


Yeah you're right that he cant sprint that quickly...thats the problem.

Established 1968

-1
What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 19:04 - Jan 9 with 288 viewsStokieBlue

What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 19:03 - Jan 9 by bluefunk

Sorry Dozzell was at fault there, he gave the man time to take a touch and set himself, made no attempt to rush him, while he couldn’t have forecast the goal that has been typical of Dozzell when he isn’t on his game


Isn't on his game? He's been one of our better players.

I will watch it again but surely the winger should be tracked by the full back? Dozzell was coming across from the middle and had loads of ground to cover - he's not Ursain Bolt.

I will watch it again after though.

SB

“You may not feel outstandingly robust, but if you are an average-sized adult you will contain within your modest frame no less than 7 X 10^18 joules of potential energy—enough to explode with the force of thirty very large hydrogen bombs, assuming you knew how to liberate it and really wished to make a point."

0
What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 19:09 - Jan 9 with 243 viewsbluefunk

What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 19:04 - Jan 9 by StokieBlue

Isn't on his game? He's been one of our better players.

I will watch it again but surely the winger should be tracked by the full back? Dozzell was coming across from the middle and had loads of ground to cover - he's not Ursain Bolt.

I will watch it again after though.

SB


I may be being harsh but really not impressed with AD’s general contribution today. He’s fine with “Hollywood” passes but lightweight in the tackle, too slow to move the ball and too easily bypassed. by the opposition on the counter.We need him to take the game by the scruff of the neck, he doesn’t show any sign of doing that
0
Login to get fewer ads

What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 19:12 - Jan 9 with 218 viewsStokieBlue

What a strike that was!! (n/t) on 19:09 - Jan 9 by bluefunk

I may be being harsh but really not impressed with AD’s general contribution today. He’s fine with “Hollywood” passes but lightweight in the tackle, too slow to move the ball and too easily bypassed. by the opposition on the counter.We need him to take the game by the scruff of the neck, he doesn’t show any sign of doing that


Guess we can disagree.

Your "Hollywood" pass was one of our best chances, you should talking about Judge missing it rather than the passes. He keeps things ticking over which nobody else does, it's a hoof if he's not there.

You seem to be expecting him to be a 30m player playing for Ipswich.

SB

“You may not feel outstandingly robust, but if you are an average-sized adult you will contain within your modest frame no less than 7 X 10^18 joules of potential energy—enough to explode with the force of thirty very large hydrogen bombs, assuming you knew how to liberate it and really wished to make a point."

0

Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2021