| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? 19:58 - Jan 9 with 2749 views | cbower |
He is spot on for me. Anyone find fault with what he says? |  |
| |  |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 19:59 - Jan 9 with 2479 views | Bluefish |
What did he say?
Did he ask why the fan base didn't pay more attention to bluefish? |  |
| |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 19:59 - Jan 9 with 2492 views | bluefunk |
Could summarise his points pkease |  | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:00 - Jan 9 with 2445 views | Scuzzer |
Not having heard what he said...would you like to enlighten us. |  |
| |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:01 - Jan 9 with 2384 views | gordon |
I certainly couldn't find any faults at all. Didn't hear a word of what he said though. |  | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:03 - Jan 9 with 2315 views | cbower |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:00 - Jan 9 by Scuzzer |
Not having heard what he said...would you like to enlighten us. |
That our problems are clear. We don't create enough and it is not just a question of personel but the formation we are persisting with just isn't working. Two up top please in essence. [Post edited 9 Jan 20:04]
| |
| |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:03 - Jan 9 with 2289 views | monty_radio |
That we carry no threat with one up top
That we need to play through the middle sometimes rather than rely on the lofted ball to the wing
That Jackson doesn't defend, but that's because he should be playing in a two
That we're not very good [Post edited 9 Jan 20:04]
|  |
| |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:05 - Jan 9 with 2170 views | WicklowBlue |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:03 - Jan 9 by monty_radio |
That we carry no threat with one up top
That we need to play through the middle sometimes rather than rely on the lofted ball to the wing
That Jackson doesn't defend, but that's because he should be playing in a two
That we're not very good [Post edited 9 Jan 20:04]
|
Can't disagree with any of that in fairness. There is a lot to be fixed and have zero confidence in this management team to do that, and from what I saw tonight neither do the players! |  | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:08 - Jan 9 with 2083 views | Bluespeed225 |
Mills is bleeding inside watching this, has been for a lot time. People bang on about his voice, but no one has been more accurate in what’s going on, on and off the pitch at PR. Him and Jarrold, himself a Blue but no commentator, were almost taking the pee when the ball went across the back, to Dozzell, then back and across the back again, | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:15 - Jan 9 with 1926 views | lazyblue |
He is always spot on with his assessment of tactics/games. | | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:17 - Jan 9 with 1870 views | IpswichKnight |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:03 - Jan 9 by monty_radio |
That we carry no threat with one up top
That we need to play through the middle sometimes rather than rely on the lofted ball to the wing
That Jackson doesn't defend, but that's because he should be playing in a two
That we're not very good [Post edited 9 Jan 20:04]
|
It’s bang on for me. | | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:19 - Jan 9 with 1818 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:15 - Jan 9 by lazyblue |
He is always spot on with his assessment of tactics/games. |
Really? I don't find him to be that knowledgeable - pretty basic stuff.
Today it was clear that the wide players of the front 3 are miles to far from the centre forward. Tbf bluefish has said that for a while and on this occasion he is right |  | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:20 - Jan 9 with 1767 views | jeera |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:08 - Jan 9 by Bluespeed225 |
Mills is bleeding inside watching this, has been for a lot time. People bang on about his voice, but no one has been more accurate in what’s going on, on and off the pitch at PR. Him and Jarrold, himself a Blue but no commentator, were almost taking the pee when the ball went across the back, to Dozzell, then back and across the back again, |
He was clearly disappointed when he said how he was hoping the enforced break might do us a few favours, but how it was all just the same as before.
Nothing had changed a bit. |  |
| |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:24 - Jan 9 with 1683 views | Durovigutum |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:19 - Jan 9 by reusersfreekicks |
Really? I don't find him to be that knowledgeable - pretty basic stuff.
Today it was clear that the wide players of the front 3 are miles to far from the centre forward. Tbf bluefish has said that for a while and on this occasion he is right |
The summary only needs to be basic as the problems are foundational, something that seems lost on the manager. |  | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:26 - Jan 9 with 1661 views | Seablu |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:03 - Jan 9 by monty_radio |
That we carry no threat with one up top
That we need to play through the middle sometimes rather than rely on the lofted ball to the wing
That Jackson doesn't defend, but that's because he should be playing in a two
That we're not very good [Post edited 9 Jan 20:04]
|
It’s that lofted looping ball out to the wing that drives me absolutely potty.
It’s a nothing ball.
Which sums up what we play.
Nothingball. [Post edited 9 Jan 20:27]
|  | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:30 - Jan 9 with 1609 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:03 - Jan 9 by cbower |
That our problems are clear. We don't create enough and it is not just a question of personel but the formation we are persisting with just isn't working. Two up top please in essence. [Post edited 9 Jan 20:04]
|
Yes, I disagree.
- Can Lambert coach players to be greater than the sum of their parts? Evidence suggests not.
- Can Lambert inspire the players to give every ounce of effort? Again, evidence suggests not.
- Does Lambert have the tactical skill to change a game? Again, evidence suggests not.
Add to that his way of integrating the youngsters does not sit right with me, nor does his treatment of the local media.
Sure, formation is a problem, as is what players in what position. But it isn't the only problem. |  |
| |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:33 - Jan 9 with 1560 views | ArnieM |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:19 - Jan 9 by reusersfreekicks |
Really? I don't find him to be that knowledgeable - pretty basic stuff.
Today it was clear that the wide players of the front 3 are miles to far from the centre forward. Tbf bluefish has said that for a while and on this occasion he is right |
Yes it might be pretty basic stuff, but that’s what this prat of a manager, Lambert doesn’t have a grasp of, is it ! THE BASICS . |  |
| |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:40 - Jan 9 with 1435 views | daisyisabaddog |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:03 - Jan 9 by cbower |
That our problems are clear. We don't create enough and it is not just a question of personel but the formation we are persisting with just isn't working. Two up top please in essence. [Post edited 9 Jan 20:04]
|
That's why he's on the radio. Two up front these days means you get over run in midfield | | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:45 - Jan 9 with 1341 views | Blue_Order |
I will always agree with Mick Mills, and everybody else should too. |  | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:47 - Jan 9 with 1310 views | TractorJed |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:19 - Jan 9 by reusersfreekicks |
Really? I don't find him to be that knowledgeable - pretty basic stuff.
Today it was clear that the wide players of the front 3 are miles to far from the centre forward. Tbf bluefish has said that for a while and on this occasion he is right |
That’s the point though, it’s basic stuff. A manger and coaching team that can’t see it. |  | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:48 - Jan 9 with 1274 views | TractorJed |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:40 - Jan 9 by daisyisabaddog |
That's why he's on the radio. Two up front these days means you get over run in midfield |
No it doesn’t. Not in this league, it’s mechanical and slow. [Post edited 9 Jan 20:52]
| | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 21:07 - Jan 9 with 1129 views | Seablu |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:40 - Jan 9 by daisyisabaddog |
That's why he's on the radio. Two up front these days means you get over run in midfield |
One up front is fine if you’re a tactically astute top division manager.
Lambert isn’t, however much he might think he is.
Two up front in League 1 isn’t going to overrun your midfield. | | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 21:11 - Jan 9 with 1098 views | lazyblue |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:19 - Jan 9 by reusersfreekicks |
Really? I don't find him to be that knowledgeable - pretty basic stuff.
Today it was clear that the wide players of the front 3 are miles to far from the centre forward. Tbf bluefish has said that for a while and on this occasion he is right |
Yes, he has years of experience and every week he picks up quickly on what’s going wrong and it’s not just the basics of the so called three players upfront it’s much more than that. | | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 21:19 - Jan 9 with 1027 views | stiff_talking |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 21:11 - Jan 9 by lazyblue |
Yes, he has years of experience and every week he picks up quickly on what’s going wrong and it’s not just the basics of the so called three players upfront it’s much more than that. |
Mick is basically saying the tactics are wrong. | | | |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 21:26 - Jan 9 with 955 views | jaykay |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 20:30 - Jan 9 by Kropotkin123 |
Yes, I disagree.
- Can Lambert coach players to be greater than the sum of their parts? Evidence suggests not.
- Can Lambert inspire the players to give every ounce of effort? Again, evidence suggests not.
- Does Lambert have the tactical skill to change a game? Again, evidence suggests not.
Add to that his way of integrating the youngsters does not sit right with me, nor does his treatment of the local media.
Sure, formation is a problem, as is what players in what position. But it isn't the only problem. |
what you look in a manager is to improve the players you have. every manger since sir alf has improved certain players in their squads. the list is endless with sir bob and george did in bucket loads. even mick for all his faults could improve a player.
i can't think of one player who lambert has improved |  |
| bring back callis ,young footers and let phil ham back in the press box |
| |
| Does anyone disagree with Mick Mills? on 21:32 - Jan 9 with 912 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
The fault I can find with him generally is that he talks as if he could do the job when all evidence points to the contrary. However, he does often pick up on a lot of what is clearly wrong. |  |
| |
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads. | |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
