| We've been ok for large parts of that 15:49 - Jan 23 with 1862 views | Steve_M |
Not great but much better than the last two matches.
Still no goal threat and three of our back five are really not on it at the moment. Holy's kicking has been awful, he's got away with three, Toto just won't learn and Chambers' use of the ball is awful today.
Still think Peterborough are more likely winners but if we can score first..... |  |
| |  |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:50 - Jan 23 with 1832 views | Illinoisblue |
It’s yet more no-threat football. We are merely existing. |  |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:51 - Jan 23 with 1814 views | Bluefish |
When you say OK you mean we are hanging in there so far in a 3rd division game at home |  |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:51 - Jan 23 with 1820 views | acj |
Agree with all of this - we’ve created nothing (and not really looked like creating anything) but we have moved the ball just a little quicker and looked to have a bit more purpose about us today, which is a big step in the right direction. |  |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:52 - Jan 23 with 1795 views | homer_123 |
It's a lot more open though Steve. We've been very powder puff in the final third.
It's ok but the bar is low from previous weeks. |  |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:52 - Jan 23 with 1772 views | Fixed_It |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:51 - Jan 23 by Bluefish |
When you say OK you mean we are hanging in there so far in a 3rd division game at home |
It is what it is. |  |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:53 - Jan 23 with 1742 views | Bluefish |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:52 - Jan 23 by Fixed_It |
It is what it is. |
It doesn't have to be. They look like a team, we look like a bunch of players on a pitch | |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:54 - Jan 23 with 1705 views | ArnieM |
Disagree . Absolutely ZERO goal threat from us , as per usual. |  |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:55 - Jan 23 with 1684 views | LankHenners |
Going a bit more direct even if it’s to force a throw in in their defensive third is more effective than what we’ve been doing but as you say hasn’t amounted to anything.
Peterborough seem slightly subdued and feel like they can definitely step it up - wouldn’t be a surprise to see them get another penalty, McGuinness and Nsiala don’t look comfortable in a partnership and the latter showed his usual rash timing once already. Dived in needlessly hard and strong to knock the ball out for a throw in early on which set the tone. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:55 - Jan 23 with 1663 views | clive_baker |
Yep.
Holy's dodgy as, Toto's a complete liability who frankly shouldn't be playing, and Drinan up front on his tod isn't going to yield much.
Not sure we've learnt anything new. |  |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:57 - Jan 23 with 1646 views | RobTheMonk |
There's so much wrong with our forward play that I genuinely question what's going on during training sessions. |  | | |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:57 - Jan 23 with 1627 views | The_Flashing_Smile |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:51 - Jan 23 by Bluefish |
When you say OK you mean we are hanging in there so far in a 3rd division game at home |
We're not creating much but to say we're "hanging in there" is clearly nonsense. |  |
| Trust the process. Trust Phil. |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:58 - Jan 23 with 1603 views | jayessess |
I think we started with the bit between our teeth and played with a bit more energy, but... quality still isn't there. |  |
| |
| Agreed on 15:59 - Jan 23 with 1586 views | unstableblue |
Still a lot of things wrong, but Posh are a good side. And our press has been so much better, Downes very influential.
But Drinan isolated. And Chambo is having an absolute shocker. So a miracle we’re not 1 down.
A big 45mins... edwards and judge need to push up and link with Bishop... that’s when we have had our best moments. But jeeze how we are missing KVY - he’d transform us today.
Ward and Chambo they were great when we were doing, they have been pants for months |  |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:59 - Jan 23 with 1578 views | LankHenners |
I’ll add I wouldn’t mind seeing Thomas on to have a go at Beevers - robust defender but slow as fook and container ship agility levels. Might be the sort of wildcard play we can get something from. | |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 16:00 - Jan 23 with 1551 views | homer_123 |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:58 - Jan 23 by jayessess |
I think we started with the bit between our teeth and played with a bit more energy, but... quality still isn't there. |
As we all know....we have the ability to occasionally play OK but its always in short spells and we rarely take advantage of it. Today is a case in point.
They've turned our defence two or three times to get in behind us....we have not even looked like doing that. | |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 16:00 - Jan 23 with 1545 views | Steve_M |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:51 - Jan 23 by acj |
Agree with all of this - we’ve created nothing (and not really looked like creating anything) but we have moved the ball just a little quicker and looked to have a bit more purpose about us today, which is a big step in the right direction. |
Shame it's not Norwood up front rather than Drinan. The latter is willing but, other than against Wigan for 45 minutes, he hasn't really offered anything when he's played. | |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 16:01 - Jan 23 with 1527 views | homer_123 |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:59 - Jan 23 by LankHenners |
I’ll add I wouldn’t mind seeing Thomas on to have a go at Beevers - robust defender but slow as fook and container ship agility levels. Might be the sort of wildcard play we can get something from. |
Attacking wise....we need a change for sure.
Nothing doing really in the first half. | |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 16:02 - Jan 23 with 1499 views | Herbivore |
It's a bit worrying that a third division home game where we've not threatened in 45 minutes is considered an okay performance. |  |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 16:02 - Jan 23 with 1491 views | homer_123 |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 15:57 - Jan 23 by The_Flashing_Smile |
We're not creating much but to say we're "hanging in there" is clearly nonsense. |
Fair point but only one team really looks like scoring. | |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 16:03 - Jan 23 with 1463 views | Bluefish |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 16:02 - Jan 23 by homer_123 |
Fair point but only one team really looks like scoring. |
They missed a pen ffs and got in behind a couple of times, how is it a fair point | |
| |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 16:05 - Jan 23 with 1443 views | BlueBadger |
| We've been ok for large parts of that on 16:02 - Jan 23 by Herbivore |
It's a bit worrying that a third division home game where we've not threatened in 45 minutes is considered an okay performance. |
It's up there with all those limp Championship defeats that were hailed as 'improved performances' in terms of the bar being low, innit. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
