| Crowds back by 17th may 15:53 - Feb 22 with 1485 views | George03 |
Will be interesting to see if the season extended. With so many games being crammed in and prospects of fans being back by mid May. Extending the season by a month and few weeks would not only benefit players but the clubs financially [Post edited 22 Feb 2021 16:00]
|  | | |  |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:03 - Feb 22 with 1352 views | dirtyboy |
Expect the EFL to drag their heels and say it wouldn't be fair as some clubs would lose their home game receipts and can't work a way around it in time. |  | | |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:07 - Feb 22 with 1308 views | George03 |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:03 - Feb 22 by dirtyboy |
Expect the EFL to drag their heels and say it wouldn't be fair as some clubs would lose their home game receipts and can't work a way around it in time. |
Suppose they could have argued that when they let fans in for the month or so in December. | | | |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:11 - Feb 22 with 1284 views | ElderGrizzly |
Won't happen with the Euros this year?
I also read somewhere that unless above a certain crowd number it will cost money for them to open. |  | | |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:15 - Feb 22 with 1248 views | Steve_M |
So a one in three chance of cricket this Summer on that basis, likely those restrictions get eased a bit nearer the time.
I suspect there is no definition of 'very large' anywhere but that would do most of us in PR. |  |
| |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:17 - Feb 22 with 1239 views | George03 |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:11 - Feb 22 by ElderGrizzly |
Won't happen with the Euros this year?
I also read somewhere that unless above a certain crowd number it will cost money for them to open. |
Yes I’d imagine the Variable cost of opening would be greater than revenue made on Matchday. The only reasoning could be some fans may be less reluctant to ask for a full refund if they saw a couple more game.
I know some club sold part ST were fans were entitled to see around 6 games. So by letting fans in some may end up seeing close to the amount of game they paid for. | | | |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:33 - Feb 22 with 1103 views | Bluefish |
Do we have to? |  |
| |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:35 - Feb 22 with 1095 views | FoghornGleghorn |
Well, have fun, whoever can be arsed. |  | | |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:36 - Feb 22 with 1090 views | WD19 |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:33 - Feb 22 by Bluefish |
Do we have to? |
Not sure we are going to be able to muster 7k ppl willing to pitch up..... |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:37 - Feb 22 with 1077 views | positivity |
if so; lambert sacked 16th may | |
| |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:56 - Feb 22 with 989 views | George03 |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:33 - Feb 22 by Bluefish |
Do we have to? |
Hopefully he’s gone by then | | | |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 16:59 - Feb 22 with 973 views | textbackup |
think I might want PL to stay then, just so he can really hear what we think |  |
| |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 17:09 - Feb 22 with 935 views | Atmosphere |
Does this mean we can look forward to a trip to Wembley for the play off final at the end of May? [Post edited 22 Feb 2021 17:10]
| | | |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 17:18 - Feb 22 with 894 views | vapour_trail |
| Crowds back by 17th may on 17:09 - Feb 22 by Atmosphere |
Does this mean we can look forward to a trip to Wembley for the play off final at the end of May? [Post edited 22 Feb 2021 17:10]
|
Sure thing, if you switch allegiances to another football club. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
