| Which is larger? 19:51 - Mar 4 with 586 views | factual_blue |
1. The money the government has had to pay out because otherwise Sir Phillip Rutman would have proved before an Employment Tribunal that priti patel is a bully?*
2. Bluebadger's 1% pay rise?
*Yes, I know they've admitted no liability, but they would have gone to the ET if they were confident. |  |
| |  |
| Which is larger? on 19:54 - Mar 4 with 555 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
I wondered this.
Was Rutnam tempted to take it to court anyway I wonder? |  |
| |
| Which is larger? on 20:05 - Mar 4 with 508 views | wkj |
I can tell you what isn't larger - Carslberg - awful stuff. |  |
| |
| Which is larger? on 20:09 - Mar 4 with 490 views | Swansea_Blue |
1%  . So a real terms pay cut then.
After this year as well. They're evil. Pure evil. |  |
| |
| Which is larger? on 20:27 - Mar 4 with 439 views | factual_blue |
| Which is larger? on 19:54 - Mar 4 by Nthsuffolkblue |
I wondered this.
Was Rutnam tempted to take it to court anyway I wonder? |
I would have thought so.
I daresay he'll now get a few tasty jobs - NEDs, Quangos etc - which wouldn't have come his way had he gone to the ET. | |
| |
| Which is larger? on 21:06 - Mar 4 with 390 views | BlueBadger |
| Which is larger? on 20:09 - Mar 4 by Swansea_Blue |
1% . So a real terms pay cut then.
After this year as well. They're evil. Pure evil. |
Sure glad I cashed all those claps in to get the car fixed up. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
