| QT 23:25 - Mar 18 with 904 views | jeera |
Victoria Atkins.
Crikey, could anyone be more patronising?
|  |
| |  |
| QT on 23:56 - Mar 18 with 864 views | Swansea_Blue |
No doubt you're singling out and criticising her just because she's a woman. Such a misogynistic view isn't really on these days. We need to respect and encourage women into all roles and levels of office in public life, especially senior ones.
So I think you really need to reflect, step back and ask yourself the question: yeah, but would you?  |  |
| |
| QT on 00:02 - Mar 19 with 860 views | jeera |
| QT on 23:56 - Mar 18 by Swansea_Blue |
No doubt you're singling out and criticising her just because she's a woman. Such a misogynistic view isn't really on these days. We need to respect and encourage women into all roles and levels of office in public life, especially senior ones.
So I think you really need to reflect, step back and ask yourself the question: yeah, but would you? |
Mate, I had to edit my own post at least 3 times before pressing 'post'.
I can confirm though, that there were people with vaginas, both in the room and on screen, who were equally as frustrated with her as I was.
Asked a direct question, she would beat around the bush, (no pun!), until she had created her own version of the question before then forming her own version of a made-up answer.
Bully would have had a field day, what with all that straw. | |
| |
| QT on 00:03 - Mar 19 with 857 views | factual_blue |
| QT on 23:56 - Mar 18 by Swansea_Blue |
No doubt you're singling out and criticising her just because she's a woman. Such a misogynistic view isn't really on these days. We need to respect and encourage women into all roles and levels of office in public life, especially senior ones.
So I think you really need to reflect, step back and ask yourself the question: yeah, but would you? |
Fortunately for you, the amended terms and conditions prohibiting misogynistic or ageist abuse haven't been added by the technical division of TWTD global and intergalactic media enterprises (registered in the Cayman Islands).
It is, however, 'imminent'. |  |
| |
| QT on 00:08 - Mar 19 with 856 views | factual_blue |
Happy to help.
'Patronising' means talking down to people.
Ironically, she's a barrister specialising in fraud (according to Factypedia). And is MP for Louth.
jeffrey archer's old seat.
It's also the constituency in which dear old Father Factual was born. | |
| |
| QT on 00:11 - Mar 19 with 841 views | jeera |
| QT on 00:08 - Mar 19 by factual_blue |
Happy to help.
'Patronising' means talking down to people.
Ironically, she's a barrister specialising in fraud (according to Factypedia). And is MP for Louth.
jeffrey archer's old seat.
It's also the constituency in which dear old Father Factual was born. |
"Patronising means talking down to people."
Whilst pretending to be on [one's] side.
Long-winded nonsense in response to direct and important questions.
Didn't like her one bit. | |
| |
| QT on 00:17 - Mar 19 with 824 views | Swansea_Blue |
| QT on 00:03 - Mar 19 by factual_blue |
Fortunately for you, the amended terms and conditions prohibiting misogynistic or ageist abuse haven't been added by the technical division of TWTD global and intergalactic media enterprises (registered in the Cayman Islands).
It is, however, 'imminent'. |
Plenty of time to be abusive yet then. | |
| |
| QT on 00:24 - Mar 19 with 817 views | Swansea_Blue |
| QT on 00:02 - Mar 19 by jeera |
Mate, I had to edit my own post at least 3 times before pressing 'post'.
I can confirm though, that there were people with vaginas, both in the room and on screen, who were equally as frustrated with her as I was.
Asked a direct question, she would beat around the bush, (no pun!), until she had created her own version of the question before then forming her own version of a made-up answer.
Bully would have had a field day, what with all that straw. |
Thankfully I've stopped watching QT as it was too annoying. And pretty much avoid social media now except here, so haven't seen anything about it on twitter either. But you're doing a sterling job taking the pain and calling out these fraudsters on all our behalf. You're a braver man than me that's for sure . | |
| |
| QT on 00:27 - Mar 19 with 810 views | jeera |
| QT on 00:24 - Mar 19 by Swansea_Blue |
Thankfully I've stopped watching QT as it was too annoying. And pretty much avoid social media now except here, so haven't seen anything about it on twitter either. But you're doing a sterling job taking the pain and calling out these fraudsters on all our behalf. You're a braver man than me that's for sure . |
I have tablets for palpitations.
It'll be fine. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
