Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Lammy handles this pretty well 16:45 - Mar 29 with 7299 viewsStokieBlue

I realise the caller is older but the state of the mindset is quite something. I find it especially interesting that she's English because she traced her roots back to the Anglo Saxons....



It's actually quite a hard listen in places.

Hard to make progress when attitudes like this remain.

SB
0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 20:57 - Mar 29 with 2836 viewstractordownsouth

Very impressed with Lammy for this reponse. He would have been well within his rights to call her a c**t and cut her off. Horrible woman.

Poll: Preferred Lambert replacement?
Blog: No Time to Panic Yet

1
Lammy handles this pretty well on 20:59 - Mar 29 with 2826 viewseastangliaisblue

Lammy handles this pretty well on 20:56 - Mar 29 by BlueBadger

I LOVE 'hidden' history, adds so much colour to an already fascinating topic.


Certainly does and there is so much of it. Everyday's a school day when it comes to history.
2
Lammy handles this pretty well on 21:14 - Mar 29 with 2813 viewsBlueBadger

Lammy handles this pretty well on 20:59 - Mar 29 by eastangliaisblue

Certainly does and there is so much of it. Everyday's a school day when it comes to history.


Someone in my village started a local history group as a lockdown project - some genuinely wonderful stuff in there.

I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Poll: Do we still want KM to be our manager
Blog: From Despair to Where?

2
Lammy handles this pretty well on 21:37 - Mar 29 with 2788 viewsPendejo

These people make my head hurt, ethnicity and nationality are two completely different things, it is entirely ok to be English and afro-caribbean. Lammy born in London is English.

Due to the census my wife's community have been having energetic and sometimes fractious discussions about ethnicity and nationality. I can't recall such things in 2011 but she's moving in more political cycles these days.

One particular guy wanted a ethnicity category of Latin American and Lusophone, so he could claim to represent a bigger group. But as we have found there is a world of difference between the Spanish speakers and Lusophones (Portuguese speakers).

Anyway I suggested Latin American as ethnicity, pretty straight forward. Nationality seems more divisive, I suggested their nationality is whatever passport they use to enter this country with as many are dual passport holders, some now hold three.

Back to the woman claiming to be English due to anglo- Saxon heritage... Surely that means she's not English if Lammy isn't?

As for keeping his cool, the man's a seasoned poll who represents Tottenham, I'm certain he's heard worse.

uberima fides
Poll: Who will Charlie Austin play for next season?

0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 22:53 - Mar 29 with 2731 viewsCoastalblue

Lammy handles this pretty well on 20:56 - Mar 29 by BlueBadger

I LOVE 'hidden' history, adds so much colour to an already fascinating topic.


Me too, like the everyday people getting involved, not just the big names of the day.

No idea when I began here, was a very long time ago. Previously known as Spirit_of_81. Love cheese, hate the colour of it, this is why it requires some blue in it.
Poll: If someone promised you promotion next season, would you think

0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 23:35 - Mar 29 with 2727 viewsWacko

Lammy handles this pretty well on 19:28 - Mar 29 by Guthrum

I haven't listened to it, but how has she claimed to have traced her ancestry back to the Anglo-Saxons?

Despite being a reasonably experienced genealogist, I've struggled to get back much more than 10 generations along any line, at most back to the early 17th century. Even if the parish records are not lost, damaged, unreadable, inconclusive (due to the similarity of names), confused by non-conformism od simply stymied by dead ends, that line of enquiry cannot go earlier than 1538, when they were first kept.

It's a long time between the Saxons and 1538, a period only covered by the occasional family tree - some of which were more than a little fanciful. And during which most people did not have surnames which could be followed.

I would presume she has taken one of the broad-brush DNA tests, which at best would be able to say she has some north-western European germanic or scandinavian genetic markers. Which says nothing about ones nationality.


Believe it or not, the other day I traced my ancestry back to the year 669...

But the bigger point that should be made, and that Jean is missing, is that if you trace your ancestry back 8 generations, around the 1700s, you have 256 direct ancestors. If you go back to Henry VIII's time you have 30k+ direct ancestors. The likelihood that all of them are 100% Anglo Saxon is total nonsense.

Poll: Who would you rather see lose their job?

4
Lammy handles this pretty well on 23:45 - Mar 29 with 2706 viewsDropCliffsNotBombs

Lammy handles this pretty well on 19:34 - Mar 29 by BlueBadger

Who was the extremely right-wing poster on here who named himself after a Saxon king or something?


HaroldfromBath?
0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 01:55 - Mar 30 with 2670 viewsTieDyedIn95

Technically no one is, as being English ceased to be a thing in the 1700's. You are a British Citizen. No such thing as an English Citizen.

Football League First Division / Premier League Champions (1): 1961—62 - Runners-up (2): 1980—81, 1981—82 Football League Second Division / EFL Championship Champions (3): 1960—61, 1967—68, 1991—92 - Play-off winners (1): 1999—2000 Football League Third Division / EFL League One Champions (2): 1953—54, 1956—57 - Southern League Champions (1): 1936—37 FA Cup Winners (1): 1977—78 - Texaco Cup Winners (1): 1972—73 UEFA Cup / UEFA Europa League Winners (1): 1980—81
Poll: Would you attend a socially distanced training ground protest?

0
Login to get fewer ads

Lammy handles this pretty well on 02:44 - Mar 30 with 2657 viewsSpruceMoose

Lammy handles this pretty well on 23:45 - Mar 29 by DropCliffsNotBombs

HaroldfromBath?


Raedwald?

Pronouns: He/Him/His. "Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country."
Poll: Selectamod

0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 09:03 - Mar 30 with 2582 viewsRadlett_blue

I think and hope that much of this attitude is generational & much more common in parts of the country where people rarely come into contact with ethnic minorities.
My late father in law, who would have been 90, had this attitude. He was collected by a black taxi driver and asked him where he was from (he was a nosey parker). When the driver replied "England", he said, "No, where are you FROM?.

Poll: Should horse racing be banned in the UK?

0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 09:12 - Mar 30 with 2567 viewsGlasgowBlue

Lammy handles this pretty well on 01:55 - Mar 30 by TieDyedIn95

Technically no one is, as being English ceased to be a thing in the 1700's. You are a British Citizen. No such thing as an English Citizen.


Technically we are British subjects. Not citizens.

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 09:34 - Mar 30 with 2551 viewsWeWereZombies

Lammy handles this pretty well on 23:35 - Mar 29 by Wacko

Believe it or not, the other day I traced my ancestry back to the year 669...

But the bigger point that should be made, and that Jean is missing, is that if you trace your ancestry back 8 generations, around the 1700s, you have 256 direct ancestors. If you go back to Henry VIII's time you have 30k+ direct ancestors. The likelihood that all of them are 100% Anglo Saxon is total nonsense.


Also, and this sidelines the generational skip in the chromosomes which makes us a bit more similar to our grandparents than our parents, if we inherit a half each from our parents (who inherited half from their patents and so on) by the time we get back to the Anglo-Saxons there is a minute fraction attributable to us unless the entire family tree is made up of Anglo-Saxons...and can be relied upon, i.e. none of the girls can be relied upon to have played away from home (I know, a terrible accusation to lay upon our Grans, and their Grans etc.)

But even if you have a genuine one hundred percent Anglo-Saxon family tree you still have to exercise a cut-off point to assume a blank slate for the land to push out the Celts, Beaker people and so on; and assume that the Viking raping and pillaging had no effect on the family tree. Except that those Anglo-Saxons arrived from what is modern day Denmark and Germany. But I think there is an argument for racial purity, you just have to accept that we are all one race and that we started off in a cave at the southern tip of Africa.

Poll: What was in Wes Burns' imaginary cup of tea ?

2
Lammy handles this pretty well on 09:39 - Mar 30 with 2546 viewsbluelagos

Lammy handles this pretty well on 09:12 - Mar 30 by GlasgowBlue

Technically we are British subjects. Not citizens.


Another reason for Scottish independence Glassers? Emancipate yourselves with a republic :-)

Poll: This new lockdown poll - what you reckon?

0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 10:18 - Mar 30 with 2529 viewsGuthrum

Lammy handles this pretty well on 23:35 - Mar 29 by Wacko

Believe it or not, the other day I traced my ancestry back to the year 669...

But the bigger point that should be made, and that Jean is missing, is that if you trace your ancestry back 8 generations, around the 1700s, you have 256 direct ancestors. If you go back to Henry VIII's time you have 30k+ direct ancestors. The likelihood that all of them are 100% Anglo Saxon is total nonsense.


Good stuff - presumably you managed to link in to a recorded royal/noble family tree? The only line in my own tree rtending towards anyone of real note is currently stuck with someone whose baptism I'm unable to find and thus, for now, an unbridgeable gap.

The thing about the theoretical number of direct ancestors is that the branches will sometimes recombine when people end up marrying distant (quite possibly unknown) cousins. So the actual number of discrete individuals will be smaller than the pure mathematical projection.

Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll: McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog: [Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 10:20 - Mar 30 with 2518 viewsGlasgowBlue

Lammy handles this pretty well on 09:39 - Mar 30 by bluelagos

Another reason for Scottish independence Glassers? Emancipate yourselves with a republic :-)


Nicola wants to keep the Queen as head of state.

Hey now, hey now, don't dream it's over
Poll: What will be announced first?
Blog: [Blog] For the Sake of My Football Club, Please Go

0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 11:53 - Mar 30 with 2486 viewsWacko

Lammy handles this pretty well on 10:18 - Mar 30 by Guthrum

Good stuff - presumably you managed to link in to a recorded royal/noble family tree? The only line in my own tree rtending towards anyone of real note is currently stuck with someone whose baptism I'm unable to find and thus, for now, an unbridgeable gap.

The thing about the theoretical number of direct ancestors is that the branches will sometimes recombine when people end up marrying distant (quite possibly unknown) cousins. So the actual number of discrete individuals will be smaller than the pure mathematical projection.


Yes, exactly. And guess what he's called...!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert,_Count_of_Hesbaye

And that's true too, especially with the fact that populations were much smaller then. But all this points to the evidence that we're all related, and should treat each other as such

Poll: Who would you rather see lose their job?

1
Lammy handles this pretty well on 13:46 - Mar 30 with 2437 viewsElephantintheRoom

Lammy handles this pretty well on 23:35 - Mar 29 by Wacko

Believe it or not, the other day I traced my ancestry back to the year 669...

But the bigger point that should be made, and that Jean is missing, is that if you trace your ancestry back 8 generations, around the 1700s, you have 256 direct ancestors. If you go back to Henry VIII's time you have 30k+ direct ancestors. The likelihood that all of them are 100% Anglo Saxon is total nonsense.


A lot of people can trace their ancestry back a lot further to before the year 0..... when god created earth, popped in Adam - and then wisked out a rib to make his life hell. We all comer from that moment according to some - in which case Lammy and the lovely lady are brother and sister.

Blog: The Swinging Sixty

0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 13:52 - Mar 30 with 2421 viewsjeera

Lammy handles this pretty well on 13:46 - Mar 30 by ElephantintheRoom

A lot of people can trace their ancestry back a lot further to before the year 0..... when god created earth, popped in Adam - and then wisked out a rib to make his life hell. We all comer from that moment according to some - in which case Lammy and the lovely lady are brother and sister.


I'm going with one's descendants crawled from the sea a lot later than the other's.

Poll: Xmas dinner: Yorkshires or not?

0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 13:59 - Mar 30 with 2405 viewsWeWereZombies

Lammy handles this pretty well on 13:46 - Mar 30 by ElephantintheRoom

A lot of people can trace their ancestry back a lot further to before the year 0..... when god created earth, popped in Adam - and then wisked out a rib to make his life hell. We all comer from that moment according to some - in which case Lammy and the lovely lady are brother and sister.


'god...popped in Adam'! I think you have just signed a death warrant with thousands of over armed and over excited religious zealots from the mid western states of the USA...

Poll: What was in Wes Burns' imaginary cup of tea ?

0
Lammy handles this pretty well on 14:09 - Mar 30 with 2394 viewsCharlie_pl_baxter

Just had a long and painful discussion about this on twitter with someone I grew up with. Glad to see more sense on the forum.

Poll: We recruit two strikers, one has to be Bonne or Wickham, who would you have?

1
Lammy handles this pretty well on 14:12 - Mar 30 with 2380 viewsjeera

Lammy handles this pretty well on 14:09 - Mar 30 by Charlie_pl_baxter

Just had a long and painful discussion about this on twitter with someone I grew up with. Glad to see more sense on the forum.


It's never too late to cut people loose.

And I know what you mean, I think we've all had friends like that.

Poll: Xmas dinner: Yorkshires or not?

0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025