| Better, but .... 14:31 - Apr 17 with 1137 views | SomethingBlue |
My word we are painful to watch when we work the ball into an attacking position. Final ball or decision almost always wrong and it's as much as we can do to actually keep it in play. Fair result today and we looked reasonably stable but there is such a lot to do. |  |
| |  |
| Better, but .... on 14:35 - Apr 17 with 1083 views | Steve_M |
I did think it offered a framework to fit better players into, certainly better than the muddle of the last few games. Bishop first half looked like he might create something playing further forward but rest of that attacking line were all fitfully involved, at best. Today also showed why we keep persisting with a half-fit (at best) Norwood, no one else really looks like scoring. |  |
| |
| Better, but .... on 15:06 - Apr 17 with 977 views | BryanPlug |
[content removed at owner's request] |  |
| |
| Better, but .... on 15:13 - Apr 17 with 932 views | haynes_toe1 |
I didnt see the game. Did we create anything decent? | | | |
| Better, but .... on 15:15 - Apr 17 with 924 views | OldTimer2 |
| Better, but .... on 14:35 - Apr 17 by Steve_M |
I did think it offered a framework to fit better players into, certainly better than the muddle of the last few games. Bishop first half looked like he might create something playing further forward but rest of that attacking line were all fitfully involved, at best. Today also showed why we keep persisting with a half-fit (at best) Norwood, no one else really looks like scoring. |
Needs a better, and fitter, strikerwith a decent back up and 2 players to play the wide roles. That , a new keeper and Mcguiness back on loan next year would do. Think Wolfenden and Dozzell showed Cook what they are capable of and Kenlock added a bit more going forward. [Post edited 17 Apr 2021 20:36]
|  |
| |
| Better, but .... on 18:06 - Apr 17 with 715 views | thebooks |
Slightly less bad than usual 🤷ðŸ»â€â™‚ï¸
Cook is **very** lucky that he’s going to be given proper funds next season, otherwise he’d be in deep trouble. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
