| Derby takeover latest 07:48 - May 14 with 2493 views | Steve_M |
Hopefully this is something that can unite the board.
|  |
| |  |
| Derby takeover latest on 11:35 - May 14 with 285 views | Bluefish |
| Derby takeover latest on 10:07 - May 14 by DanTheMan |
I swear I read somewhere that the EFL wanted any punishment to be for this season for that reason. |
They can't appeal the decision but they can appeal the punishment so surely no chance of it being sorted for this season |  |
| |
| Derby takeover latest on 11:41 - May 14 with 280 views | Basuco |
| Derby takeover latest on 09:20 - May 14 by hype313 |
Fair enough, obviously you are far more in the know than I am, but from what you say, sounds like their accounting practices leave a lot to be desired... |
In simple terms, they added a residual value to players at the end of their contract, despite the fact they walk away for nothing. This method is not used by any other club and wiped £30 million of debt from the accounts over the last three years, enabling then to comply with FFP. If I have understood things correctly that is. |  | | |
| Derby takeover latest on 11:45 - May 14 with 262 views | DanTheMan |
| Derby takeover latest on 11:35 - May 14 by Bluefish |
They can't appeal the decision but they can appeal the punishment so surely no chance of it being sorted for this season |
That's true, it would all need to be wrapped up very quickly for any punishment this season.
Although by the sounds of everything else, a punishment next season isn't going to be brilliant for them either. |  |
| |
| Derby takeover latest on 11:46 - May 14 with 256 views | Bluefish |
| Derby takeover latest on 11:41 - May 14 by Basuco |
In simple terms, they added a residual value to players at the end of their contract, despite the fact they walk away for nothing. This method is not used by any other club and wiped £30 million of debt from the accounts over the last three years, enabling then to comply with FFP. If I have understood things correctly that is. |
Yes basically could buy someone for 10 million and instead of writing that down over the contract length they were saying the player would be worth more later in the contract. They were quite open about it and the spending wasn't hitting their numbers.
It all had to backfire with promotion though. Not sure what happened at the end of contracts but they ended up renewing contracts one year for players being released, I think blackman was one of them
Article here not got time to read it so might not back up what I've said
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/sport/football/football-ne
[Post edited 14 May 2021 11:48]
| |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
