| Jenny Powell 15:49 - Jun 16 with 2717 views | Metal_Hacker |
Still got it ….just saying
Oh and Melanie Sykes
[Post edited 16 Jun 2021 15:51]
|  |
| |  |
| Jenny Powell on 15:53 - Jun 16 with 2659 views | Coastalblue |
What was that weird programme she started on? I think it might have been a Jonathon King thing? Her and a guy who were complete amateurs given a chance to present a TV show or am I just going mad? |  |
| |
| Jenny Powell on 15:55 - Jun 16 with 2629 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Jenny Powell on 15:53 - Jun 16 by Coastalblue |
What was that weird programme she started on? I think it might have been a Jonathon King thing? Her and a guy who were complete amateurs given a chance to present a TV show or am I just going mad? |
You’re right as I seem to remember something. Seems she’s been around for years now
Right I’m gonna Google | |
| |
| Jenny Powell on 15:57 - Jun 16 with 2616 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Jenny Powell on 15:53 - Jun 16 by Coastalblue |
What was that weird programme she started on? I think it might have been a Jonathon King thing? Her and a guy who were complete amateurs given a chance to present a TV show or am I just going mad? |
Tv show was called No Limits
She’s 53 ….wow !!! | |
| |
| Liz Hurley is 56..... on 17:02 - Jun 16 with 2374 views | Bloots |
.....just saying.
 |  |
| Elite Level Poster: Elite Level Supporter: Elite Level Human |
| |
| Liz Hurley is 56..... on 17:06 - Jun 16 with 2344 views | hoppy |
| Liz Hurley is 56..... on 17:02 - Jun 16 by Bloots |
.....just saying.
|
So, from this thread alone, I've discovered I'm just underneath both Jenny Powell and Liz Hurley...
Fair enough. |  |
| |
| Liz Hurley is 56..... on 17:11 - Jun 16 with 2297 views | ronnyd |
| Liz Hurley is 56..... on 17:06 - Jun 16 by hoppy |
So, from this thread alone, I've discovered I'm just underneath both Jenny Powell and Liz Hurley...
Fair enough. |
You should be so lucky.  |  | | |
| Liz Hurley is 56..... on 18:18 - Jun 16 with 2174 views | Metal_Hacker |
| Liz Hurley is 56..... on 17:02 - Jun 16 by Bloots |
.....just saying.
|
Yeah you got me. She’d be in my top ten if she played her cards right | |
| |
| Jenny Powell on 20:50 - Jun 16 with 2010 views | factual_blue |
Glad to see rampant sexism is still alive.
Actually, I'm not glad, just disappointed. [Post edited 16 Jun 2021 20:58]
|  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Liz Hurley is 56..... on 21:33 - Jun 16 with 1879 views | StochesStotasBlewe |
| Liz Hurley is 56..... on 17:11 - Jun 16 by ronnyd |
You should be so lucky. |
He didn't mention Kylie. |  |
| We have no village green, or a shop.
It's very, very quiet.
I can walk to the pub. |
| |
| Liz Hurley is 56..... on 23:55 - Jun 16 with 1710 views | hoppy |
I didn’t… but now you mention her, I’m under her as well… | |
| |
| Jenny Powell on 02:07 - Jun 17 with 1654 views | bournemouthblue |
| Jenny Powell on 20:50 - Jun 16 by factual_blue |
Glad to see rampant sexism is still alive.
Actually, I'm not glad, just disappointed. [Post edited 16 Jun 2021 20:58]
|
It's not really sexism though is it, voyeuristic and distasteful, certainly?
It's certainly not ageist, though, so that's kind of a positive in one sense
I'm throwing Salma Hayek in the TWTD certified cougar suggestions pot
[Post edited 17 Jun 2021 2:10]
|  |
| |
| Jenny Powell on 06:34 - Jun 17 with 1572 views | bluelagos |
| Jenny Powell on 02:07 - Jun 17 by bournemouthblue |
It's not really sexism though is it, voyeuristic and distasteful, certainly?
It's certainly not ageist, though, so that's kind of a positive in one sense
I'm throwing Salma Hayek in the TWTD certified cougar suggestions pot
[Post edited 17 Jun 2021 2:10]
|
"It's not really sexism though is it, voyeuristic and distasteful, certainly?"
It's the objectification of women. The idea that women are first and foremost here for men's pleasure.
Two problems with that, first is that threads like this hardly make Twtd a welcoming space for women supporters/Twtdrs. I would imagine threads like this at best bore them silly, at worst some may find them upsetting.
Second problem is some men fail to stop at objectifying women and go on to harass women and worse. And this place is frequented by many young and impressionable men.
Threads like this normalise that objectification and some may take away that "objectifying women" is a cool/ legitimate way of conducting themselves.
For those so inclined, there are plenty of places on the internet to find pics of scantily clad women, don't see why people feel the need to share any on here tbh. |  |
| |
| Jenny Powell on 09:20 - Jun 17 with 1391 views | ZXBlue |
| Jenny Powell on 06:34 - Jun 17 by bluelagos |
"It's not really sexism though is it, voyeuristic and distasteful, certainly?"
It's the objectification of women. The idea that women are first and foremost here for men's pleasure.
Two problems with that, first is that threads like this hardly make Twtd a welcoming space for women supporters/Twtdrs. I would imagine threads like this at best bore them silly, at worst some may find them upsetting.
Second problem is some men fail to stop at objectifying women and go on to harass women and worse. And this place is frequented by many young and impressionable men.
Threads like this normalise that objectification and some may take away that "objectifying women" is a cool/ legitimate way of conducting themselves.
For those so inclined, there are plenty of places on the internet to find pics of scantily clad women, don't see why people feel the need to share any on here tbh. |
That's a huge leap from the starting point which is "this woman is attractive". | | | |
| Jenny Powell on 09:45 - Jun 17 with 1350 views | bluelagos |
| Jenny Powell on 09:16 - Jun 17 by factual_blue |
What if the picture were of a black woman in a bikini and the picture were captioned 'check out this hot n*gg**?
Sexism, racism?
Or both?
Now that sensible people are all agreed that racism is wrong and that black lives matter, that doesn't give people a free pass to be sexist.
It's a great disappointment that Phil hasn't included it in the T&Cs. But he's happy to accept rampant agesim, so I'm not holding out much hope. |
Absolutely. I think that was supposed to be being sorted... | |
| |
| Brad Pitt is 57..... on 09:52 - Jun 17 with 1313 views | Bloots |
| Jenny Powell on 06:34 - Jun 17 by bluelagos |
"It's not really sexism though is it, voyeuristic and distasteful, certainly?"
It's the objectification of women. The idea that women are first and foremost here for men's pleasure.
Two problems with that, first is that threads like this hardly make Twtd a welcoming space for women supporters/Twtdrs. I would imagine threads like this at best bore them silly, at worst some may find them upsetting.
Second problem is some men fail to stop at objectifying women and go on to harass women and worse. And this place is frequented by many young and impressionable men.
Threads like this normalise that objectification and some may take away that "objectifying women" is a cool/ legitimate way of conducting themselves.
For those so inclined, there are plenty of places on the internet to find pics of scantily clad women, don't see why people feel the need to share any on here tbh. |
....just saying.
 | |
| Elite Level Poster: Elite Level Supporter: Elite Level Human |
| |
| Jenny Powell on 09:53 - Jun 17 with 1310 views | bluelagos |
| Jenny Powell on 09:20 - Jun 17 by ZXBlue |
That's a huge leap from the starting point which is "this woman is attractive". |
Which of the comments I made do you feel is unfair? Happy to discuss/debate any of the points. | |
| |
| Brad Pitt is 57..... on 10:00 - Jun 17 with 1276 views | bluelagos |
| Brad Pitt is 57..... on 09:52 - Jun 17 by Bloots |
....just saying.
|
Pretty much the equivalent of an "All lives matter" retort. | |
| |
| Not really.... on 10:04 - Jun 17 with 1251 views | Bloots |
| Brad Pitt is 57..... on 10:00 - Jun 17 by bluelagos |
Pretty much the equivalent of an "All lives matter" retort. |
....I just think he looks pretty damn hot, particularly for a man of his age.
I also think he's a really good actor who doesn't get taken as seriously as he should because of the way he looks.
If anything my "retort" as you call it is merely to highlight that not all views are as narrow and polarised as you might think. | |
| Elite Level Poster: Elite Level Supporter: Elite Level Human |
| |
| Jenny Powell on 10:06 - Jun 17 with 1231 views | ZXBlue |
| Jenny Powell on 09:53 - Jun 17 by bluelagos |
Which of the comments I made do you feel is unfair? Happy to discuss/debate any of the points. |
The things you describe are bad things. They just don't follow from the OP without an enormous leap. | | | |
| Jenny Powell on 10:27 - Jun 17 with 1184 views | ChiefXL |
| Jenny Powell on 09:16 - Jun 17 by factual_blue |
What if the picture were of a black woman in a bikini and the picture were captioned 'check out this hot n*gg**?
Sexism, racism?
Or both?
Now that sensible people are all agreed that racism is wrong and that black lives matter, that doesn't give people a free pass to be sexist.
It's a great disappointment that Phil hasn't included it in the T&Cs. But he's happy to accept rampant agesim, so I'm not holding out much hope. |
Considering your ignorant and hugely insensitive comments during the Vienna terrorist attack at the tail end of last year, which you did not apologise for, I don't feel you're in a position to get on any high horse. |  | | |
| Jenny Powell on 11:56 - Jun 17 with 1096 views | lightuser |
| Jenny Powell on 06:34 - Jun 17 by bluelagos |
"It's not really sexism though is it, voyeuristic and distasteful, certainly?"
It's the objectification of women. The idea that women are first and foremost here for men's pleasure.
Two problems with that, first is that threads like this hardly make Twtd a welcoming space for women supporters/Twtdrs. I would imagine threads like this at best bore them silly, at worst some may find them upsetting.
Second problem is some men fail to stop at objectifying women and go on to harass women and worse. And this place is frequented by many young and impressionable men.
Threads like this normalise that objectification and some may take away that "objectifying women" is a cool/ legitimate way of conducting themselves.
For those so inclined, there are plenty of places on the internet to find pics of scantily clad women, don't see why people feel the need to share any on here tbh. |
But are you getting into the territory of telling women what they can or can't do because you think that it objectifies them, when it's their choice how they portray themselves?
If you haven't noticed huge numbers of women are starting to get very savvy and are controlling their own narratives about how they wish to portray and act in their sexuality and lives. This will only increase in the future as these ideas spread amongst their peers and they grow "the balls" to stand up to the mysogonists amongst us men.
But also, is it women's fault if men can't control themselves? Are you victim blaming?
I know a solution. Perhaps we can make all women cover themselves totally so that any impessionable men won't be adversly affected by any disgusting woman flesh. Oh and maybe build some nice period houses for that awkward "time of the month " thing. GFM anyone? Child brides? Doweries? Female foeticide?
Let women grow wings and set them free. Us men will just have to live with the consequences and what little crumbs that they deign to throw us in the future.ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ | | | |
| Jenny Powell on 12:08 - Jun 17 with 1052 views | bluelagos |
| Jenny Powell on 11:56 - Jun 17 by lightuser |
But are you getting into the territory of telling women what they can or can't do because you think that it objectifies them, when it's their choice how they portray themselves?
If you haven't noticed huge numbers of women are starting to get very savvy and are controlling their own narratives about how they wish to portray and act in their sexuality and lives. This will only increase in the future as these ideas spread amongst their peers and they grow "the balls" to stand up to the mysogonists amongst us men.
But also, is it women's fault if men can't control themselves? Are you victim blaming?
I know a solution. Perhaps we can make all women cover themselves totally so that any impessionable men won't be adversly affected by any disgusting woman flesh. Oh and maybe build some nice period houses for that awkward "time of the month " thing. GFM anyone? Child brides? Doweries? Female foeticide?
Let women grow wings and set them free. Us men will just have to live with the consequences and what little crumbs that they deign to throw us in the future.ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ |
Not sure I have even commented on any women or what or how they choose to behave. Not my place to comment and I haven't, largely for the reasons you highlight.
I have commented on some men who have chosen to share pics of half naked women along with the usual "I would" type comments. | |
| |
| Jenny Powell on 13:27 - Jun 17 with 932 views | lightuser |
| Jenny Powell on 12:08 - Jun 17 by bluelagos |
Not sure I have even commented on any women or what or how they choose to behave. Not my place to comment and I haven't, largely for the reasons you highlight.
I have commented on some men who have chosen to share pics of half naked women along with the usual "I would" type comments. |
No probs BL.
2nd, 4th and 5th paragraphs.
4th I thought was the most "problematic".
But from your reply, obviously unintentional. ðŸ‘
But Jenny is half naked? Blimy. Liz's is a party frock and the last one is normal beachwear too.
I didn't take you for a puritan. Are you constantly tutting when you see what's walking down your average high street, if you think that Jenny & co are half naked. Lol | | | |
| Jenny Powell on 13:40 - Jun 17 with 866 views | Bergholtblue |
"It's the objectification of women. The idea that women are first and foremost here for men's pleasure."
I tend to agree, but on the other hand, these are not candid photos. These are publicity shots available in the public domain. Aren't they objectifying themselves? |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
