| No comprendo 21:49 - Jul 6 with 1039 views | GeoffSentence |
Why wasnt that a penalty? |  |
| |  |
| No comprendo on 21:51 - Jul 6 with 1028 views | Zx1988 |
No intention to handle, and the arm was in a natural position in the circumstances.
I thought the same initially and was bemused as to why it wasn’t VARed, but the replay from the better angle made it crystal clear.
Top refereeing. [Post edited 6 Jul 2021 21:53]
|  |
| |
| No comprendo on 21:52 - Jul 6 with 996 views | Bluefish |
| No comprendo on 21:51 - Jul 6 by Zx1988 |
No intention to handle, and the arm was in a natural position in the circumstances.
I thought the same initially and was bemused as to why it wasn’t VARed, but the replay from the better angle made it crystal clear.
Top refereeing. [Post edited 6 Jul 2021 21:53]
|
Pretty obvious really |  |
| |
| No comprendo on 21:52 - Jul 6 with 990 views | Scuzzer |
Because they dont give handball if the player kicks it onto his own hand. |  |
| |
| No comprendo on 21:53 - Jul 6 with 975 views | GeoffSentence |
| No comprendo on 21:51 - Jul 6 by Zx1988 |
No intention to handle, and the arm was in a natural position in the circumstances.
I thought the same initially and was bemused as to why it wasn’t VARed, but the replay from the better angle made it crystal clear.
Top refereeing. [Post edited 6 Jul 2021 21:53]
|
that unnatural position thing seems a bit wooly to me. Remember Mark McGuiness giving away a penalty by kicking the ball onto his own arm? Given his stance his arm was in a perfectly normal position, but it was enough to be deemed a penalty. | |
| |
| No comprendo on 21:53 - Jul 6 with 972 views | RonFearonsHair |
| No comprendo on 21:51 - Jul 6 by Zx1988 |
No intention to handle, and the arm was in a natural position in the circumstances.
I thought the same initially and was bemused as to why it wasn’t VARed, but the replay from the better angle made it crystal clear.
Top refereeing. [Post edited 6 Jul 2021 21:53]
|
Yes, it would have ruined the game had it been given. |  | | |
| No comprendo on 21:55 - Jul 6 with 943 views | Zx1988 |
| No comprendo on 21:53 - Jul 6 by GeoffSentence |
that unnatural position thing seems a bit wooly to me. Remember Mark McGuiness giving away a penalty by kicking the ball onto his own arm? Given his stance his arm was in a perfectly normal position, but it was enough to be deemed a penalty. |
Not having seen the McGuinness incident, I’d hazard that’s simply a case in point as to why Herr Dr Brych is refereeing in a European Championship semi-final, whilst the other bloke is reffing in League 1. [Post edited 6 Jul 2021 21:55]
| |
| |
| No comprendo on 22:54 - Jul 6 with 831 views | Guthrum |
| No comprendo on 21:53 - Jul 6 by GeoffSentence |
that unnatural position thing seems a bit wooly to me. Remember Mark McGuiness giving away a penalty by kicking the ball onto his own arm? Given his stance his arm was in a perfectly normal position, but it was enough to be deemed a penalty. |
Tho in this case, the Italian's arm was supporting his body, not flapping loose. Moving it out of the way would have meant falling flat on his face. |  |
| |
| No comprendo on 08:42 - Jul 7 with 703 views | andytown |
| No comprendo on 21:53 - Jul 6 by GeoffSentence |
that unnatural position thing seems a bit wooly to me. Remember Mark McGuiness giving away a penalty by kicking the ball onto his own arm? Given his stance his arm was in a perfectly normal position, but it was enough to be deemed a penalty. |
Didn’t they change the rules at some point? Might have been during the season? | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| No comprendo on 09:00 - Jul 7 with 655 views | Swansea_Blue |
| No comprendo on 08:42 - Jul 7 by andytown |
Didn’t they change the rules at some point? Might have been during the season? |
I thought they'd changed it to take away the intent part and only now had the T-shirt rule - so if it hits the arm or hand anywhere below short sleeve length then it's a pen, irrespective of intent. That would be stupid of course, but I'm pretty sure that was the change that was made (or at least discussed to death last summer). [Post edited 7 Jul 2021 9:00]
|  |
| |
| No comprendo on 09:09 - Jul 7 with 637 views | GeoffSentence |
| No comprendo on 08:42 - Jul 7 by andytown |
Didn’t they change the rules at some point? Might have been during the season? |
That might explain it I suppose.
Would also be typical Ipswich to fall foul of it before The Man decided it was bollox and reverted it, like the crack down on wrestling at corners which resulted in a penalty against us in the first game it was applied, then seemed to be forgotten. | |
| |
| No comprendo on 09:32 - Jul 7 with 619 views | farkenhell |
| No comprendo on 21:51 - Jul 6 by Zx1988 |
No intention to handle, and the arm was in a natural position in the circumstances.
I thought the same initially and was bemused as to why it wasn’t VARed, but the replay from the better angle made it crystal clear.
Top refereeing. [Post edited 6 Jul 2021 21:53]
|
Wouldn't his natural position have both arms raised? Or, perhaps, both stretched out for a swallow dive? | | | |
| No comprendo on 17:24 - Jul 7 with 538 views | quad |
| No comprendo on 09:32 - Jul 7 by farkenhell |
Wouldn't his natural position have both arms raised? Or, perhaps, both stretched out for a swallow dive? |
If his hand had been in its natural position then he would have been arrested  | | | |
| No comprendo on 19:19 - Jul 7 with 498 views | Wickets |
| No comprendo on 21:53 - Jul 6 by GeoffSentence |
that unnatural position thing seems a bit wooly to me. Remember Mark McGuiness giving away a penalty by kicking the ball onto his own arm? Given his stance his arm was in a perfectly normal position, but it was enough to be deemed a penalty. |
Yes that was a Ref from a lot lower level who made a huge mistake . |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
