| Bishop to lincoln on 11:19 - Jul 21 with 2631 views | SomethingBlue |
Yep, good move for him and Lincoln. Hadn't realised just how good their business has been so far. They will be up there again. MK this time too I expect. This season is going to be a hell of battle. |  |
|  |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:19 - Jul 21 with 2613 views | rayman_10 |
Also at the bottom of article says agreed fee with the scum for Gibbs… wonder what it is. Guessing 500k mark. |  |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:20 - Jul 21 with 2598 views | MrTown |
Happy to see the back of him personally, but wish him the best of luck.
Town and Norwich agree a fee for Gibbs at the bottom of that article as well - another source of income there. |  |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:21 - Jul 21 with 2555 views | clive_baker |
He had 4 offers on the table last week. All in L1. |  |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:21 - Jul 21 with 2550 views | trncbluearmy |
he`s the one we should keep.
No problem facing any of the others who have gone or going, but a fit motivated Bishop will be a handful |  | | |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:21 - Jul 21 with 2549 views | chicoazul |
But TWTD hive mind said Fraser coming here was dependant on Bishop going the other way!!1!1!1 it’s almost as if |  |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:22 - Jul 21 with 2544 views | tractorboy1978 |
Be interested to know the fee. Whilst I appreciate it's not going to be substantial, you'd like to think it's more than nominal. | | | |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:23 - Jul 21 with 2517 views | positivity |
any fee? hope we get a sell-on clause just in case | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:23 - Jul 21 with 2498 views | Wallingford_Boy |
Decent player, but needed a fresh start.
I wonder what sort of fee we got, £200k ish?
Clearly worth more, but the market is a little deflated at the moment, so wouldn't surprise me if we only got that much.
Clever business to get him under contract I guess, otherwise he'd have been a freebie! |  |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:24 - Jul 21 with 2470 views | WD19 |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:22 - Jul 21 by tractorboy1978 |
Be interested to know the fee. Whilst I appreciate it's not going to be substantial, you'd like to think it's more than nominal. |
I suspect there isn't one at all. Probably just agreement on a sell-on should his career reignite. |  | | |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:24 - Jul 21 with 2475 views | itfcjoe |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:21 - Jul 21 by clive_baker |
He had 4 offers on the table last week. All in L1. |
I'd heard before play offs it would be Lincoln, but depended on whether they went up or not - so clearly been going on a while |  |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:24 - Jul 21 with 2458 views | clive_baker |
I wonder if we can find Jackson a loan move at least, if not a permanent switch.
Wouldn't have thought it would be too long until Downes goes, at which point that really is the last of the gang. | |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:25 - Jul 21 with 2430 views | solemio |
I'm not sure that the Bishop of Lincoln would like this upstart Bishop. | | | |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:25 - Jul 21 with 2422 views | positivity |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:23 - Jul 21 by Wallingford_Boy |
Decent player, but needed a fresh start.
I wonder what sort of fee we got, £200k ish?
Clearly worth more, but the market is a little deflated at the moment, so wouldn't surprise me if we only got that much.
Clever business to get him under contract I guess, otherwise he'd have been a freebie! |
think he'd met a clause, so we had to keep him on, not sure if we'd have kept him on otherwise. | |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:26 - Jul 21 with 2403 views | chicoazul |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:23 - Jul 21 by positivity |
any fee? hope we get a sell-on clause just in case |
Presume there will be some sort of small fee as he has a year left. I don’t think we took up contracts this summer for Bish etc to get fees though but to use the players as possible makeweights in deals. | |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:27 - Jul 21 with 2362 views | WD19 |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:24 - Jul 21 by itfcjoe |
I'd heard before play offs it would be Lincoln, but depended on whether they went up or not - so clearly been going on a while |
That's interesting. So if they had gone up they wouldn't have considered him up to it? | | | |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:27 - Jul 21 with 2349 views | itfcjoe |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:26 - Jul 21 by chicoazul |
Presume there will be some sort of small fee as he has a year left. I don’t think we took up contracts this summer for Bish etc to get fees though but to use the players as possible makeweights in deals. |
Bishop's was automatically triggered due to appearances | |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:27 - Jul 21 with 2343 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:24 - Jul 21 by clive_baker |
I wonder if we can find Jackson a loan move at least, if not a permanent switch.
Wouldn't have thought it would be too long until Downes goes, at which point that really is the last of the gang. |
No point in a loan move for Jackson with a year left on his deal, unless a sizeable loan fee. |  |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:28 - Jul 21 with 2327 views | clive_baker |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:24 - Jul 21 by itfcjoe |
I'd heard before play offs it would be Lincoln, but depended on whether they went up or not - so clearly been going on a while |
It's a good move for him. Progressive club, strong side, not a million miles from Cambridge albeit too far to commute. MK Dons was a similar proposition in many respects, but I think Lincoln is a better move for him. Wycombe were interested too. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see him tear it up there, he's been working hard in the off season to get himself into peak condition.
A shame for me, as I said all along since his chat with Cook. Baby and bathwater springs to mind with this one but oh well, got to trust the process and hope the new additions can take us on a level. | |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:30 - Jul 21 with 2278 views | clive_baker |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:27 - Jul 21 by Kieran_Knows |
No point in a loan move for Jackson with a year left on his deal, unless a sizeable loan fee. |
I just meant if we can't find a permanent home for him. There's less point him sitting here collecting a salary and not playing. I can't see any way back for him, so getting a couple of hundred grand off the wage bill might be seen as a win.
Still surprises me we extended his contract, I'll be surprised if we get a decent fee for him but who knows. | |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:30 - Jul 21 with 2267 views | BtreeBlueBlood |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:19 - Jul 21 by SomethingBlue |
Yep, good move for him and Lincoln. Hadn't realised just how good their business has been so far. They will be up there again. MK this time too I expect. This season is going to be a hell of battle. |
they got 14 players in last yr also |  | | |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:34 - Jul 21 with 2184 views | chicoazul |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:27 - Jul 21 by itfcjoe |
Bishop's was automatically triggered due to appearances |
Ah right, cheers. Probably on balance had his best year for us last year since he first broke through! I wish we could have kept him but oh well. | |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:51 - Jul 21 with 2030 views | MrTown |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:27 - Jul 21 by Kieran_Knows |
No point in a loan move for Jackson with a year left on his deal, unless a sizeable loan fee. |
If a loan side was willing to pay % of salary, would still be more beneficial than him sitting out his contract here and Town pay 100% of salary. | |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:56 - Jul 21 with 1987 views | jayessess |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:23 - Jul 21 by positivity |
any fee? hope we get a sell-on clause just in case |
Four teams interested and we know both MK Dons (Fraser) and Lincoln (Grant) got money in the door recently. I'd be surprised if we didn't get a modest fee at least. |  |
| |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:58 - Jul 21 with 1968 views | rayman_10 |
| Bishop to lincoln on 11:51 - Jul 21 by MrTown |
If a loan side was willing to pay % of salary, would still be more beneficial than him sitting out his contract here and Town pay 100% of salary. |
Ideally I think we need to get him gone permanently. Unfortunately, I can’t see anyone paying what he’s ‘valued’ which I’m guessing now is between the 250-500k mark. It still shocks me we never took the money offered last year. I can only see him leaving in a swap deal. Hopefully, if anyone is interested in Jackson, they have a player who suits us. Part of me was fully expecting him to go back to Accrington and Bishop coming this was with us paying a couple of hundred thousand on top. Obviously the last position we need is a striker so that’s out there window. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
