Lincoln 22:04 - Sep 15 with 900 views | Garv | Will have been a month since our last away game. I can see the players and management looking forward to a change of scenery and perhaps not feeling the pressure of having to take the game to the opposition so much. We just need to stay a bit more solid and be patient. We should always score goals with our options. It's all about the goals against column right now. Assuming it'll continue to be 4-2-3-1, my team would be; Walton Donacien Edmundson Burgess Coulsen* Evans Carroll Burns Fraser Aluko Bonne *Do think Penney is unlucky not to be playing though. I'd also be quite happy to see Norwood instead of Fraser and play 4-4-1-1. [Post edited 15 Sep 2021 22:24]
| |
| | |
Lincoln on 22:08 - Sep 15 with 844 views | itfcsuth | Won’t be Morsy as he continues to serve his 3 match ban. Walton Vincent-Young - Edmundson - Burgess - Coulson Harper - Evans Burns - Chaplin - Edwards Bonne Subs: GK, Donacien, Fraser, Celina, Pigott, Carroll, Penney [Post edited 15 Sep 2021 22:09]
| | | |
Lincoln on 22:10 - Sep 15 with 829 views | Garv |
Lincoln on 22:08 - Sep 15 by itfcsuth | Won’t be Morsy as he continues to serve his 3 match ban. Walton Vincent-Young - Edmundson - Burgess - Coulson Harper - Evans Burns - Chaplin - Edwards Bonne Subs: GK, Donacien, Fraser, Celina, Pigott, Carroll, Penney [Post edited 15 Sep 2021 22:09]
|
Course - brain fart. We're fcked, then. | |
| |
Lincoln on 22:16 - Sep 15 with 786 views | Smithy | Carroll deserves a start over Evans or Harper | |
| |
Lincoln on 01:55 - Sep 16 with 609 views | pointofblue | Walton Donacien - Woolfenden - Burgess - Coulson Harper - Evans - Carroll Burns - Bonne - Celina Substitutes: GK, Penney, Edmundson, Aluko, Edwards, Norwood, Pigott Fraser for Pigott if fit. Either Edwards or Aluko into the first XI if Celina isn’t ready to start, dependant on the former’s fitness. We need to solidify midfield and the number ten role is pointless at the moment because, no matter who plays there, we fail miserably to get him in the game. It’s not saying much but the Woolfenden-Burgess partnership looked more solid than Edmundson-Burgess. | |
| |
| |