| Please explain the Edwards sub 17:05 - Oct 16 with 975 views | Bluefish |
Fair enough 15 minutes earlier but by that point the game had become a lump and scrap affair. What in earth was Edwards supposed to bring to it??
You could seenit coming yet again and again he couldn't do anything to change it |  |
| |  |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:13 - Oct 16 with 883 views | billlm |
Because cook is tactically inept like Lambert, should have been nisala if anyone to shore the defence and put a body on the line, |  | | |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:16 - Oct 16 with 853 views | Bluefish |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:13 - Oct 16 by billlm |
Because cook is tactically inept like Lambert, should have been nisala if anyone to shore the defence and put a body on the line, |
Harper would be the one for me to add strength and try and get a foot on it. Edwards was a sub lined up earlier when it was a different game but he delayed because of the Burgess knock. He should have seen the game had changed | |
| |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:19 - Oct 16 with 828 views | Dave_Buh |
It can’t be explained. It just further proves he’s not the man for the job. |  | | |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:19 - Oct 16 with 827 views | Swansea_Blue |
It's times like that you want to bring on a right hard barsteward to break up play in the middle of the pitch and wind the clock down. Trouble is, we didn't have any on the bench. El Miz wasn't having the best game at all. He could have come off. Burgess was having a bit of a 'mare too - Nsiala's physicality could have helped. When the game is won, you don't necessarily have to go all out to win it again. We could have shut that out if we wanted to. |  |
| |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:21 - Oct 16 with 799 views | AljoBlue |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:19 - Oct 16 by Swansea_Blue |
It's times like that you want to bring on a right hard barsteward to break up play in the middle of the pitch and wind the clock down. Trouble is, we didn't have any on the bench. El Miz wasn't having the best game at all. He could have come off. Burgess was having a bit of a 'mare too - Nsiala's physicality could have helped. When the game is won, you don't necessarily have to go all out to win it again. We could have shut that out if we wanted to. |
Fraser injured had a big ice pack on his knee on subs bench after being taken off | | | |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:22 - Oct 16 with 778 views | billlm |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:16 - Oct 16 by Bluefish |
Harper would be the one for me to add strength and try and get a foot on it. Edwards was a sub lined up earlier when it was a different game but he delayed because of the Burgess knock. He should have seen the game had changed |
He doesn't see anything, and no plan b,c,d,e, | | | |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:24 - Oct 16 with 759 views | billlm |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:16 - Oct 16 by Bluefish |
Harper would be the one for me to add strength and try and get a foot on it. Edwards was a sub lined up earlier when it was a different game but he delayed because of the Burgess knock. He should have seen the game had changed |
I forgot Harper was on the bench | | | |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:24 - Oct 16 with 757 views | Bluefish |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:21 - Oct 16 by AljoBlue |
Fraser injured had a big ice pack on his knee on subs bench after being taken off |
No problem taking him off but bring on Harper | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:34 - Oct 16 with 712 views | itfcjoe |
Was obviously better to try and get another winger in when the ball is dropping to no one in the centre circle every 30 seconds instead of a 3rd CM |  |
| |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 18:24 - Oct 16 with 640 views | Bluefish |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 17:34 - Oct 16 by itfcjoe |
Was obviously better to try and get another winger in when the ball is dropping to no one in the centre circle every 30 seconds instead of a 3rd CM |
I still stunned at that one celina and Edwards had 2 or 3 touches between them. It gave the game away | |
| |
| Please explain the Edwards sub on 18:29 - Oct 16 with 616 views | GlasgowBlue |
Giving a player like Edwards just 8 minutes is ridiculous.
He needs time to get into the game and show his magic.
Bringing him on in the last 8 minutes when we are hanging on to a lead is criminal. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
