Was Cook "their man?" 07:47 - Nov 21 with 859 views | bobbyramsey | If not then who was and is he still available? Michael Appleton was mentioned but was quickly tied down by Lincoln. Who was it........? | | | | |
Was Cook "their man?" on 08:27 - Nov 21 with 774 views | Oldboy | Irrelevant. Cook is here and is going to be here for a while yet. | | | |
Was Cook "their man?" on 08:34 - Nov 21 with 757 views | ITFC_Forever | Appleton is overrated. | |
| |
Was Cook "their man?" on 09:28 - Nov 21 with 686 views | gtsb1966 | Cook so far has been a failure here. Nobody can deny that yet as soon as people say get rid they are taken to task. Why? It's not working, he won't change, so get rid. | | | |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:08 - Nov 21 with 606 views | bobbyramsey |
Was Cook "their man?" on 08:27 - Nov 21 by Oldboy | Irrelevant. Cook is here and is going to be here for a while yet. |
True but doesn't answer my question...... | | | |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:11 - Nov 21 with 595 views | Oldboy |
Was Cook "their man?" on 09:28 - Nov 21 by gtsb1966 | Cook so far has been a failure here. Nobody can deny that yet as soon as people say get rid they are taken to task. Why? It's not working, he won't change, so get rid. |
Because why change managers every year. Given where we were, I would say we have taken steps forward as a club. Not sure there are any better available anyway. | | | |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:12 - Nov 21 with 588 views | Oldboy |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:08 - Nov 21 by bobbyramsey | True but doesn't answer my question...... |
Some questions don't need answers. | | | |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:14 - Nov 21 with 582 views | chrismakin |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:11 - Nov 21 by Oldboy | Because why change managers every year. Given where we were, I would say we have taken steps forward as a club. Not sure there are any better available anyway. |
warnock would get us out of this league on a whim. Or Ian Evett That's where Ashton would earn his £ its not us fans who would need to make that choice. BUT when ever it's made and who ever it is. I just want someone who has more than 1 fken formation | |
| |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:21 - Nov 21 with 563 views | Oldboy |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:14 - Nov 21 by chrismakin | warnock would get us out of this league on a whim. Or Ian Evett That's where Ashton would earn his £ its not us fans who would need to make that choice. BUT when ever it's made and who ever it is. I just want someone who has more than 1 fken formation |
Not sure they are better. Warnock would sort the defence out I suppose, not that there is much wrong with it. Evett would be a risk. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:23 - Nov 21 with 553 views | chrismakin |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:21 - Nov 21 by Oldboy | Not sure they are better. Warnock would sort the defence out I suppose, not that there is much wrong with it. Evett would be a risk. |
you know i've always been a PC fan, but he just continues to frustrate. It's a difficult question of who could do better, but it's also not a very difficult question at the same time based on PC's actual win record. at the moment even Lambert would be an improvement! | |
| |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:26 - Nov 21 with 537 views | Oldboy |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:23 - Nov 21 by chrismakin | you know i've always been a PC fan, but he just continues to frustrate. It's a difficult question of who could do better, but it's also not a very difficult question at the same time based on PC's actual win record. at the moment even Lambert would be an improvement! |
Don't mention the "L" word. | | | |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:29 - Nov 21 with 520 views | ArnieM | I wish some people on here would get a grip . Paul Cook isn’t going to be sacked . The whole club is WIP… and promotion this season whilst desirable was not necessarily expected . | |
| |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:32 - Nov 21 with 504 views | Reuser_is_God |
Was Cook "their man?" on 08:34 - Nov 21 by ITFC_Forever | Appleton is overrated. |
Going from Cook to Appleton will be a massive downgrade. | |
| |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:33 - Nov 21 with 493 views | bluejacko |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:11 - Nov 21 by Oldboy | Because why change managers every year. Given where we were, I would say we have taken steps forward as a club. Not sure there are any better available anyway. |
Ok the club is moving forward! But who is driving this? I would say the team behind the scenes are the main factor not Cook. Although I am undecided at the moment on Cook he does seem a lost soul without his side kick. | | | |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:34 - Nov 21 with 490 views | bobbyramsey |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:29 - Nov 21 by ArnieM | I wish some people on here would get a grip . Paul Cook isn’t going to be sacked . The whole club is WIP… and promotion this season whilst desirable was not necessarily expected . |
I know that and that topic wasn't my intention, people have used it as another excuse to jump all over Cook. I asked who Gamechangers choice was if not Cook, didn't want a debate about is Cook good enough or not. | | | |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:43 - Nov 21 with 462 views | Oldboy |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:34 - Nov 21 by bobbyramsey | I know that and that topic wasn't my intention, people have used it as another excuse to jump all over Cook. I asked who Gamechangers choice was if not Cook, didn't want a debate about is Cook good enough or not. |
Sorry. Pep was first choice, Klopp second. If neither were interested then Cook was their man. | | | |
Was Cook "their man?" on 10:48 - Nov 21 with 438 views | Pippin1970 | Sunderland most of us knew we would lose at. I think we will get new players in January. The pressure on Cook is if we don't get least near there and season after win promotion. | | | |
| |