| 442 05:45 - Dec 14 with 1242 views | boncho1977 |
Can we all stop posting that we should play 442.
Firstly it is a prehistoric formation that’s hardly played even in the national league and more importantly we do not have the players to play 442.
442 - requires 2 box to box midfielders - we have none
You need solid full backs - we have 1
The defence will be exposed so the centre backs have to be rapid - even though Fridge is solid he isn’t the quickest
Also you need your forwards to have contrasting styles - none of our forwards can link up together
Also playing 442 - you are wasting the talents of celina and chaplin
So stop the 442 posts it’s embarrassing and it’s like listening to Mike Bassett
If we are to play 2 up top then we should play 3 at the back, we have good wing backs.
3412 or even 352 would work |  | | |  |
| 442 on 06:21 - Dec 14 with 1179 views | Kropotkin123 |
The only thing worse than playing 442 is not playing 442. Def info |  |
| |
| 442 on 06:49 - Dec 14 with 1151 views | BondiBlue |
Are people asking for 442 or two up front? I take your point about three at the back - we definitely have wing-backs! | |
| |
| 442 on 06:58 - Dec 14 with 1139 views | BlueForYou |
Dont be ridiculous. Nothing wrong with 442. It's how you play that matters, & we need two strikers up front. Football is a game with 11 players a side. But I'm a fan of 352 so there. |  | | |
| 442 on 07:34 - Dec 14 with 1051 views | GeoffSentence |
I'm more of a Pyramid or maybe WM fan myself. |  |
| |
| 442 on 08:35 - Dec 14 with 982 views | Bramidan |
Whatever happened to the diamond, seemed all we use to hear once. | | | |
| 442 on 16:33 - Dec 16 with 866 views | Kropotkin123 |
| 442 on 08:35 - Dec 14 by Bramidan |
Whatever happened to the diamond, seemed all we use to hear once. |
That formation is in the rough | |
| |
| 442 on 16:37 - Dec 16 with 837 views | RadioOrwell |
It's worth noting that the difference between 442 / 433 / 352 / etc etc, are merely a few yards apart on the pitch. |  | | |
| 442 on 16:38 - Dec 16 with 833 views | clive_baker |
The fact of the matter is while people obsess about formations, if you've got defenders with toblerones on their feet, statues in midfield that can't win a 2nd ball, and forwards who it bounces off, then you're up the creek. We've looked bereft of ideas, sluggish, disorganised defensively. We could've played 4-4-4 last night and still lost.
It's a bit of a red herring to focus on the formation when we can't get the fundamentals right. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| 442 on 16:47 - Dec 16 with 781 views | Wickets |
| 442 on 16:38 - Dec 16 by clive_baker |
The fact of the matter is while people obsess about formations, if you've got defenders with toblerones on their feet, statues in midfield that can't win a 2nd ball, and forwards who it bounces off, then you're up the creek. We've looked bereft of ideas, sluggish, disorganised defensively. We could've played 4-4-4 last night and still lost.
It's a bit of a red herring to focus on the formation when we can't get the fundamentals right. |
What is the quote players win games not systems . |  | | |
| 442 on 16:50 - Dec 16 with 771 views | positivity |
442 was disastrous last night, looked much better after we changed it | |
| |
| 442 on 17:12 - Dec 16 with 732 views | MattinLondon |
At this time of year we should really be playing the Christmas tree formation. |  | | |
| 442 on 17:23 - Dec 16 with 686 views | jayessess |
| 442 on 16:50 - Dec 16 by positivity |
442 was disastrous last night, looked much better after we changed it |
3 at the back looked better in and out of possession |  |
| |
| 442 on 17:30 - Dec 16 with 673 views | Keaneish |
Rotherham are top - they play 442 |  |
| |
| 442 on 17:32 - Dec 16 with 660 views | jayessess |
| 442 on 17:30 - Dec 16 by Keaneish |
Rotherham are top - they play 442 |
no they don't | |
| |
| 442 on 17:34 - Dec 16 with 654 views | positivity |
| 442 on 17:30 - Dec 16 by Keaneish |
Rotherham are top - they play 442 |
they don't though, do they? | |
| |
| You should try going to matches..... on 17:38 - Dec 16 with 642 views | Bloots |
| 442 on 17:30 - Dec 16 by Keaneish |
Rotherham are top - they play 442 |
....occasionally.
You'll learn something. |  |
| TWTD Leadership Group/Elite Level Supporter/Anti-Bullying Crusader |
| |
| 442 on 17:59 - Dec 16 with 604 views | cbower |
352.
Walton
CBs Woolf Edmundson Donacien
Wing Backs Burns KVY
CMs Morsy Evans with Celina AM
Forwards 2 from Bonne / Norwood / Chaplin / Pigott
Subs El Miz, Fraser, Burgess, Nsiala, Coulson, Hladky, Harper, Edwards et al |  |
| |
| You should try going to matches..... on 18:11 - Dec 16 with 571 views | Keaneish |
| You should try going to matches..... on 17:38 - Dec 16 by Bloots |
....occasionally.
You'll learn something. |
Bless you all scratching around on your BBC apps. Barlaser drops back into the back 3 to make a back 4 and they switch into a 442 from a 3142. Looks like you were at the bar when that was happening though.
Game 15 for the season for me. Been as far south as Plymouth and as far north as Wigan. What you on? | |
| |
| You should try going to matches..... on 18:17 - Dec 16 with 555 views | positivity |
| You should try going to matches..... on 18:11 - Dec 16 by Keaneish |
Bless you all scratching around on your BBC apps. Barlaser drops back into the back 3 to make a back 4 and they switch into a 442 from a 3142. Looks like you were at the bar when that was happening though.
Game 15 for the season for me. Been as far south as Plymouth and as far north as Wigan. What you on? |
you've been to 15 rotherham games? in that case i bow to your greater knowledge! | |
| |
| So you were wrong.... on 18:19 - Dec 16 with 553 views | Bloots |
| You should try going to matches..... on 18:11 - Dec 16 by Keaneish |
Bless you all scratching around on your BBC apps. Barlaser drops back into the back 3 to make a back 4 and they switch into a 442 from a 3142. Looks like you were at the bar when that was happening though.
Game 15 for the season for me. Been as far south as Plymouth and as far north as Wigan. What you on? |
...apology accepted.
26 (I think), this isn't an argument you are going to win sweetcheeks. | |
| TWTD Leadership Group/Elite Level Supporter/Anti-Bullying Crusader |
| |
| You should try going to matches..... on 18:21 - Dec 16 with 545 views | Ewan_Oozami |
| You should try going to matches..... on 18:11 - Dec 16 by Keaneish |
Bless you all scratching around on your BBC apps. Barlaser drops back into the back 3 to make a back 4 and they switch into a 442 from a 3142. Looks like you were at the bar when that was happening though.
Game 15 for the season for me. Been as far south as Plymouth and as far north as Wigan. What you on? |
https://www.footballcritic.com/rotherham-united-fc/formations/13923 |  |
| |
| You should try going to matches..... on 18:24 - Dec 16 with 542 views | positivity |
28 matches, zero as 4-4-2! what's that as a percentage? | |
| |
| You should try going to matches..... on 18:27 - Dec 16 with 529 views | jayessess |
| You should try going to matches..... on 18:11 - Dec 16 by Keaneish |
Bless you all scratching around on your BBC apps. Barlaser drops back into the back 3 to make a back 4 and they switch into a 442 from a 3142. Looks like you were at the bar when that was happening though.
Game 15 for the season for me. Been as far south as Plymouth and as far north as Wigan. What you on? |
Footballers move around during matches, shocker.
Literally everyone describes Rotherham's formation as 3-5-2 and at no point in our game with Rotherham was Barlaser more than momentarily occupying the centre back position. Watch the extended highlights back, in every single clip he's 10/20 yards in advance of the back three. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
