So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) 13:59 - Dec 20 with 1620 views | itfcjoe | | |
| | |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:01 - Dec 20 with 1589 views | SitfcB | That’s what I was wondering yesterday. | |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:02 - Dec 20 with 1566 views | J2BLUE | Another strike against Ashton which proved to be incorrect then. Although like conspiracy theorists they will make something up. | |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:04 - Dec 20 with 1541 views | BlueToad | Has he just said in presser that he has watched us our last 8-10 games ??? Curious. | |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:05 - Dec 20 with 1509 views | itfcjoe |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:04 - Dec 20 by BlueToad | Has he just said in presser that he has watched us our last 8-10 games ??? Curious. |
No, that he has watched them - as in DVDs or the modern equivalent of them | |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:05 - Dec 20 with 1502 views | SitfcB |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:04 - Dec 20 by BlueToad | Has he just said in presser that he has watched us our last 8-10 games ??? Curious. |
Probably watched them back over the last few days? | |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:06 - Dec 20 with 1477 views | BseaBlue |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:05 - Dec 20 by itfcjoe | No, that he has watched them - as in DVDs or the modern equivalent of them |
I would imagine that could be to help him (and the board) understand what it required in January, as well as what needs to be worked on of course. | | | |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:07 - Dec 20 with 1475 views | BlueToad |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:05 - Dec 20 by SitfcB | Probably watched them back over the last few days? |
Makes sense of course! | |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:08 - Dec 20 with 1453 views | Herbivore |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:05 - Dec 20 by itfcjoe | No, that he has watched them - as in DVDs or the modern equivalent of them |
Poor bastard. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:15 - Dec 20 with 1349 views | SWGF |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:05 - Dec 20 by itfcjoe | No, that he has watched them - as in DVDs or the modern equivalent of them |
DVDs? Alright, Grandad? | |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:17 - Dec 20 with 1294 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:15 - Dec 20 by SWGF | DVDs? Alright, Grandad? |
We were fairly recently Marcus Evans' Ipswich don't forget. He'll be lucky if we didn't send him a crate of Betamax's [Post edited 20 Dec 2021 14:19]
| |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:18 - Dec 20 with 1278 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:02 - Dec 20 by J2BLUE | Another strike against Ashton which proved to be incorrect then. Although like conspiracy theorists they will make something up. |
Reads as though the shortlist was as uninspiring as we first thought, so they went looking. Bodes very well IMO | |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:27 - Dec 20 with 1171 views | Steve_M |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:05 - Dec 20 by itfcjoe | No, that he has watched them - as in DVDs or the modern equivalent of them |
Hopefully only after he had signed a contract. | |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:27 - Dec 20 with 1168 views | Radlett_blue |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:05 - Dec 20 by itfcjoe | No, that he has watched them - as in DVDs or the modern equivalent of them |
I am already feeling huge sympathy for McKenna if he has watched our last 10 games. | |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:31 - Dec 20 with 1108 views | Keaneish |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:04 - Dec 20 by BlueToad | Has he just said in presser that he has watched us our last 8-10 games ??? Curious. |
There’s definitely 8 - 10 better ones. If I was him I’d have started with the UEFA ‘81 box set. | |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:36 - Dec 20 with 1055 views | WD19 |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:27 - Dec 20 by Radlett_blue | I am already feeling huge sympathy for McKenna if he has watched our last 10 games. |
Did he watch them before or after signing his contract? | | | |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:46 - Dec 20 with 946 views | DavoIPB |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:08 - Dec 20 by Herbivore | Poor bastard. |
Yep. Must have been a painful watch! | | | |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:55 - Dec 20 with 886 views | BlueBadger |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:18 - Dec 20 by Cheltenham_Blue | Reads as though the shortlist was as uninspiring as we first thought, so they went looking. Bodes very well IMO |
Or, the 'shortlist' was only ever a thing for fools, their money and the bookies. | |
| |
So we head hunted McKenna, rather than him applying for the job (n/t) on 14:58 - Dec 20 with 864 views | Mullet | Also makes me wonder if Cook knew much before etc | |
| |
| |