Nigel Pearson 20:45 - Jan 20 with 5580 views | chicoazul | He always comes across as a right weirdo doesn’t he. I’m glad we have swerved him managing us to date. Did you know he once killed a wolf with his bare hands? |  |
| |  |
Nigel Pearson on 07:10 - Jan 21 with 1482 views | ZXBlue |
Nigel Pearson on 06:27 - Jan 21 by chrismakin | Morning Poppett. Not really evidence is it. Where's the picture of you sat in the room with Pearson infront of you on the occasion you speak of specifically being exactly how you said he was being. Otherwise it's just hearsay what you're saying and not really right to comment on someone without actually evidence of such a specific event for people for people to make a judgement over. Apparently the rules as set yesterday by the forum police. Have a good day :) |
If you care about things being true, even opinions should be based on something substantive, rather than just pulled out of your arse. Tip for the day... |  | |  |
Nigel Pearson on 07:17 - Jan 21 with 1463 views | m14_blue |
Nigel Pearson on 06:27 - Jan 21 by chrismakin | Morning Poppett. Not really evidence is it. Where's the picture of you sat in the room with Pearson infront of you on the occasion you speak of specifically being exactly how you said he was being. Otherwise it's just hearsay what you're saying and not really right to comment on someone without actually evidence of such a specific event for people for people to make a judgement over. Apparently the rules as set yesterday by the forum police. Have a good day :) |
I’ve no issue with you at all, but you’re being a d1ck here. |  | |  |
Nigel Pearson on 07:28 - Jan 21 with 1438 views | chrismakin |
Nigel Pearson on 07:17 - Jan 21 by m14_blue | I’ve no issue with you at all, but you’re being a d1ck here. |
Of course. For doing what was done by others yesterday but it was fine then... Anyways its Friday. Weekend almost here. I feel we will win tomorrow no evidence for that opinion tho. |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 07:32 - Jan 21 with 1431 views | chrismakin |
Nigel Pearson on 22:46 - Jan 20 by jeera | You guess, you speculate, you make things up, invent stuff like a small child would. You try to stir sh1t. You then come out with complete nonsense like this. You are clueless and there have been people queuing up for many months/years to tell you but you don't listen. You make comments like this one and the previous but you don't understand the words you are using. [Post edited 20 Jan 2022 22:50]
|
Oh jeers you still don't get it. Opinions are opinions. Speculation is exactly what this forum is for. Discussion negative or positive is what it's for. There's just a certain core that doesn't like a different opinion to theirs. It's sweet, they all look after their own. |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 07:32 - Jan 21 with 1440 views | Kieran_Knows |
Nigel Pearson on 06:27 - Jan 21 by chrismakin | Morning Poppett. Not really evidence is it. Where's the picture of you sat in the room with Pearson infront of you on the occasion you speak of specifically being exactly how you said he was being. Otherwise it's just hearsay what you're saying and not really right to comment on someone without actually evidence of such a specific event for people for people to make a judgement over. Apparently the rules as set yesterday by the forum police. Have a good day :) |
Seriously mate, you need a break from this place. Jesus wept. |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 07:35 - Jan 21 with 1426 views | chrismakin |
Nigel Pearson on 07:32 - Jan 21 by Kieran_Knows | Seriously mate, you need a break from this place. Jesus wept. |
I'm ok thank you. Perhaps you should check in on the others for asking for evidence for opinions? Maybe they need a break? |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 07:39 - Jan 21 with 1434 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Nigel Pearson on 06:27 - Jan 21 by chrismakin | Morning Poppett. Not really evidence is it. Where's the picture of you sat in the room with Pearson infront of you on the occasion you speak of specifically being exactly how you said he was being. Otherwise it's just hearsay what you're saying and not really right to comment on someone without actually evidence of such a specific event for people for people to make a judgement over. Apparently the rules as set yesterday by the forum police. Have a good day :) |
The cameras were all pointing at Pearson you thick twonk. Well done on single handedly making this place unbearable again. |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 07:43 - Jan 21 with 1425 views | Kieran_Knows |
Nigel Pearson on 07:35 - Jan 21 by chrismakin | I'm ok thank you. Perhaps you should check in on the others for asking for evidence for opinions? Maybe they need a break? |
Because you’re being a tit asking for a picture of a poster sat in a room with Nigel Pearson ffs. Go and have a Kit Kat mate. |  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
Nigel Pearson on 07:43 - Jan 21 with 1413 views | chrismakin |
Nigel Pearson on 07:39 - Jan 21 by Cheltenham_Blue | The cameras were all pointing at Pearson you thick twonk. Well done on single handedly making this place unbearable again. |
Unbearable because you're asked to do what you lot asked from me first... funny really because had you lot not done that... I wouldn't have asked you for the same. So well done on single handedly making this place unbearable again. BTW.. shame you didn't get that picture of you there. I once saw a press conference with Pearson and he came across as a lovely bloke. Cameras were on him tho so can't provide evidence. Sorry. |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 07:45 - Jan 21 with 1410 views | chrismakin |
Nigel Pearson on 07:43 - Jan 21 by Kieran_Knows | Because you’re being a tit asking for a picture of a poster sat in a room with Nigel Pearson ffs. Go and have a Kit Kat mate. |
Only asking what was asked of me. I don't care if he was there or not and would gladly hear all about it as it seems interesting but felt evidence is required before I can discuss it as that was the rules set by the forum board yesterday. |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 08:03 - Jan 21 with 1399 views | Swailsey |
Nigel Pearson on 06:27 - Jan 21 by chrismakin | Morning Poppett. Not really evidence is it. Where's the picture of you sat in the room with Pearson infront of you on the occasion you speak of specifically being exactly how you said he was being. Otherwise it's just hearsay what you're saying and not really right to comment on someone without actually evidence of such a specific event for people for people to make a judgement over. Apparently the rules as set yesterday by the forum police. Have a good day :) |
Oh my god. You are a maniac. Presumably now you will be asking Phil for any evidence of any news he’s heard? [Post edited 21 Jan 2022 8:04]
|  |
| Who said: "Colin Healy made Cesc Fabregas look like Colin Healy"? | We miss you TLA |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 08:14 - Jan 21 with 1373 views | davblue |
Nigel Pearson on 22:19 - Jan 20 by Cheltenham_Blue | I was in a room with Nigel Pearson, twice at a post match press conference at Leicester City. He came across as a bell end and a narcissist. I was a sport photographer for 12 years, covering Champions league, Premier League and Championship football. I worked for The Press Association. I now teach Photojournalism at University. I’m a board member of the British Press Photographers Association and a Press Card holder. I’ve met Phil a couple of times, in a professional capacity, (mainly at Bristol City v Ipswich games), and a good number of this board know too. How’s that grab you, poppet? [Post edited 20 Jan 2022 22:26]
|
Sounds like complete made up bull if I'm honest! |  | |  |
Nigel Pearson on 08:15 - Jan 21 with 1362 views | chrismakin |
Nigel Pearson on 08:03 - Jan 21 by Swailsey | Oh my god. You are a maniac. Presumably now you will be asking Phil for any evidence of any news he’s heard? [Post edited 21 Jan 2022 8:04]
|
I wouldn't personally no. But one you're better of asking those that make the rules. It's interesting really. Its a message board for discussions yet people are hooked up on what's real what's not. When pretty much all users correctly hide behind made up usernames. It makes no sense why some are so keen on truths and evidence when your talking to someone hiding behind a username. BTW usernames are the correct way to go.. but just find it interesting. [Post edited 21 Jan 2022 8:24]
|  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 08:35 - Jan 21 with 1309 views | davblue |
Nigel Pearson on 07:32 - Jan 21 by chrismakin | Oh jeers you still don't get it. Opinions are opinions. Speculation is exactly what this forum is for. Discussion negative or positive is what it's for. There's just a certain core that doesn't like a different opinion to theirs. It's sweet, they all look after their own. |
You need to be on TalkingTown they are always on about 'opinions' as a defence. Are you the Media Mogul? |  | |  |
Nigel Pearson on 08:41 - Jan 21 with 1302 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
Nigel Pearson on 08:14 - Jan 21 by davblue | Sounds like complete made up bull if I'm honest! |
Oh well. |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 09:07 - Jan 21 with 1264 views | Swailsey |
Nigel Pearson on 08:15 - Jan 21 by chrismakin | I wouldn't personally no. But one you're better of asking those that make the rules. It's interesting really. Its a message board for discussions yet people are hooked up on what's real what's not. When pretty much all users correctly hide behind made up usernames. It makes no sense why some are so keen on truths and evidence when your talking to someone hiding behind a username. BTW usernames are the correct way to go.. but just find it interesting. [Post edited 21 Jan 2022 8:24]
|
Then why do you read it at all? |  |
| Who said: "Colin Healy made Cesc Fabregas look like Colin Healy"? | We miss you TLA |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 09:13 - Jan 21 with 1248 views | BiGDonnie |
Nigel Pearson on 22:03 - Jan 20 by chrismakin | Any evidence from said conferences? |
Keep it up troll, you'll be banned soon enough. |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 09:14 - Jan 21 with 1239 views | BiGDonnie |
Nigel Pearson on 22:19 - Jan 20 by Cheltenham_Blue | I was in a room with Nigel Pearson, twice at a post match press conference at Leicester City. He came across as a bell end and a narcissist. I was a sport photographer for 12 years, covering Champions league, Premier League and Championship football. I worked for The Press Association. I now teach Photojournalism at University. I’m a board member of the British Press Photographers Association and a Press Card holder. I’ve met Phil a couple of times, in a professional capacity, (mainly at Bristol City v Ipswich games), and a good number of this board know too. How’s that grab you, poppet? [Post edited 20 Jan 2022 22:26]
|
Pahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa This is far as I've got, but i do hope numbnuts has responded. Nicely done CB. |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 09:29 - Jan 21 with 1212 views | Ewan_Oozami |
Nigel Pearson on 08:15 - Jan 21 by chrismakin | I wouldn't personally no. But one you're better of asking those that make the rules. It's interesting really. Its a message board for discussions yet people are hooked up on what's real what's not. When pretty much all users correctly hide behind made up usernames. It makes no sense why some are so keen on truths and evidence when your talking to someone hiding behind a username. BTW usernames are the correct way to go.. but just find it interesting. [Post edited 21 Jan 2022 8:24]
|
It is a message board for football discussion, but it also a place where people share their experiences of football, life, careers, etc. Anyone who's been on this board for a while knows that CB had been in involved in sports photography for a number of years and has experience of meeting and photographing managers, players, club staff, etc as part of the job. You may not have known this when you made your original comment, which is fair enough, but once CB had declared their credentials, and had the support of other posters, doubling down was not an option... |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 09:33 - Jan 21 with 1190 views | chrismakin |
Nigel Pearson on 09:13 - Jan 21 by BiGDonnie | Keep it up troll, you'll be banned soon enough. |
Trolling for asking the same question put to me yesterday? Interesting take. |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 09:34 - Jan 21 with 1199 views | Swailsey |
Nigel Pearson on 09:29 - Jan 21 by Ewan_Oozami | It is a message board for football discussion, but it also a place where people share their experiences of football, life, careers, etc. Anyone who's been on this board for a while knows that CB had been in involved in sports photography for a number of years and has experience of meeting and photographing managers, players, club staff, etc as part of the job. You may not have known this when you made your original comment, which is fair enough, but once CB had declared their credentials, and had the support of other posters, doubling down was not an option... |
Evidence? |  |
| Who said: "Colin Healy made Cesc Fabregas look like Colin Healy"? | We miss you TLA |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 09:38 - Jan 21 with 1186 views | Ewan_Oozami |
Nigel Pearson on 09:34 - Jan 21 by Swailsey | Evidence? |
Let's wait for the report from Sue Gray.... |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 09:41 - Jan 21 with 1185 views | PhilTWTD |
Nigel Pearson on 22:03 - Jan 20 by chrismakin | Any evidence from said conferences? |
Not sure of the need for this. Pretty well known Cheltenham was a photographer and, as he says, I have met him press rooms at matches. I'm sure he's been in Nigel Pearson press conferences, as I have. He certainly went through a spell at Leicester where he was very difficult with the press, called a friend of mine a bastard under his breath, which was caught by the microphone, and another an ostrich. On the other hand, he has been relatively chatty in pressers down here, talking about how he'd have liked the job here when he was in the running in 2006 (I was told at the time the job was his to lose and he interviewed poorly) and a friend of mine worked with him at Leicester and elsewhere and has a lot of time for him both as a manager and a person.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  | |  |
Nigel Pearson on 09:43 - Jan 21 with 1167 views | footers |
Nigel Pearson on 09:33 - Jan 21 by chrismakin | Trolling for asking the same question put to me yesterday? Interesting take. |
Here's the difference, Frimley. Yesterday you stated that Bakinson was an Ashton signing which is simply an opinion you stated as fact. People asked how you would know this and you couldn't tell them so you got the arse. CB stated his view on Pearson based on the times he'd encountered him. You, being the clever clogs you are, thought you'd catch him out and ask for evidence. He supplied his well-known backstory of being a pro sports photographer which made you look like a tit. Now you're doubling down. Rescinding your ban was a big mistake. And I'm sure the soft play area is missing you greatly. |  |
|  |
Nigel Pearson on 09:44 - Jan 21 with 1156 views | chrismakin |
Nigel Pearson on 09:41 - Jan 21 by PhilTWTD | Not sure of the need for this. Pretty well known Cheltenham was a photographer and, as he says, I have met him press rooms at matches. I'm sure he's been in Nigel Pearson press conferences, as I have. He certainly went through a spell at Leicester where he was very difficult with the press, called a friend of mine a bastard under his breath, which was caught by the microphone, and another an ostrich. On the other hand, he has been relatively chatty in pressers down here, talking about how he'd have liked the job here when he was in the running in 2006 (I was told at the time the job was his to lose and he interviewed poorly) and a friend of mine worked with him at Leicester and elsewhere and has a lot of time for him both as a manager and a person.
This post has been edited by an administrator |
The need was required as he and others spent yesterday asking for evidence for an opinion. I've seen the OPS past posts so know of his past. Just asking for the evidence requested by the forum police for sharing such as post that he did. For what it's worth Pearson has always come across exactly as the OP says. |  |
|  |
| |