| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 16:45 - Jan 24 with 620 views | BlueBadger |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 10:40 - Jan 24 by monytowbray |
Wow, Badger now gone full Glassers v2.
Very woke and fact based. |
I'm the best Centrist Dad you'll ever meet. Because I'm down with dissing on racism from all quarters. |  |
|  |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 16:46 - Jan 24 with 615 views | BlueBadger |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 10:46 - Jan 24 by Seablu |
It’s been in the pre-production stage for a couple of months.
Now started dropping the odd teaser to gauge public opinion.
Very sad to see. |
LOL. The cultists are all up and about, I see. | |
| |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 16:49 - Jan 24 with 598 views | monytowbray |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 16:45 - Jan 24 by BlueBadger |
I'm the best Centrist Dad you'll ever meet. Because I'm down with dissing on racism from all quarters. |
So are most left wing folk, but feel free to jump in bed with our resident disinformation posters. |  |
| |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 17:39 - Jan 24 with 553 views | Darth_Koont |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 16:45 - Jan 24 by BlueBadger |
I'm the best Centrist Dad you'll ever meet. Because I'm down with dissing on racism from all quarters. |
Yep. Even the exaggerated weaponised stuff.
And another one who loves the accusations but runs a mile from the evidence.
You’re a real servant to the cause. |  |
| |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 17:46 - Jan 24 with 534 views | Darth_Koont |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 15:50 - Jan 24 by lowhouseblue |
you and your link are confusing labour voters with labour members. the hard left, who joined the party in numbers under corbyn, have a long and continuing problem with anti-semitism. the problem was with the members, who sadly, as we know full well, were unrepresentative of the labour voters. |
Well, as you know, the evidence from the membership can only show a fraction of 1% based on complaints and eventual suspensions and expulsions. Despite teams of “committed antiracists” like LAAS, GnasherJew and other cranks trawling the internet night and day for years – and even going back decades.
Which evidence of a rise under Corbyn are you using? Or are you just insinuating as usual? | |
| |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 18:10 - Jan 24 with 513 views | lowhouseblue |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 17:46 - Jan 24 by Darth_Koont |
Well, as you know, the evidence from the membership can only show a fraction of 1% based on complaints and eventual suspensions and expulsions. Despite teams of “committed antiracists” like LAAS, GnasherJew and other cranks trawling the internet night and day for years – and even going back decades.
Which evidence of a rise under Corbyn are you using? Or are you just insinuating as usual? |
oh I don't know, how about the ehrc report.
but you accept that your link was entirely spurious since it refers to polls of labour voters rather than of the labour members which was where the problem lay.
jeez the stuff you'll turn a blind eye to for political convenience. |  |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 18:33 - Jan 24 with 478 views | Darth_Koont |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 18:10 - Jan 24 by lowhouseblue |
oh I don't know, how about the ehrc report.
but you accept that your link was entirely spurious since it refers to polls of labour voters rather than of the labour members which was where the problem lay.
jeez the stuff you'll turn a blind eye to for political convenience. |
But the EHRC report doesn’t say that there was a rise in antisemitism under Corbyn. As you know. And, never mind the far-right antisemitism which is a feature not a bug, the percentage of the far-left who are antisemitic is still below even that of the Tories and around about the LibDems.
All these cases and people across the board are too many but that’s the evidence. Unless you muddy the waters and redefine criticism of Israel as antisemitic which is of course what many have tried to do. Then Johnson writing about Jews controlling the media but supporting Israel is not even an issue to these “committed anti-racists”. But people who are pro-Palestinian and critical of the apartheid system in Israel are suddenly a “rising problem”. And even an “existential threat to British Jews”.
Quite disgraceful to weaponise racism and stoke fears like this and through relentless accusations rather than evidence. | |
| |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 19:10 - Jan 24 with 449 views | Darth_Koont |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 18:33 - Jan 24 by Darth_Koont |
But the EHRC report doesn’t say that there was a rise in antisemitism under Corbyn. As you know. And, never mind the far-right antisemitism which is a feature not a bug, the percentage of the far-left who are antisemitic is still below even that of the Tories and around about the LibDems.
All these cases and people across the board are too many but that’s the evidence. Unless you muddy the waters and redefine criticism of Israel as antisemitic which is of course what many have tried to do. Then Johnson writing about Jews controlling the media but supporting Israel is not even an issue to these “committed anti-racists”. But people who are pro-Palestinian and critical of the apartheid system in Israel are suddenly a “rising problem”. And even an “existential threat to British Jews”.
Quite disgraceful to weaponise racism and stoke fears like this and through relentless accusations rather than evidence. |
I’ll repeat: What is your evidence?
Put up or shut up. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 19:20 - Jan 24 with 430 views | lowhouseblue |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 19:10 - Jan 24 by Darth_Koont |
I’ll repeat: What is your evidence?
Put up or shut up. |
220 cases were put to the ehrc as part of its investigation. one of the problems it found was that labour under corbyn couldn't even quantify the number of anti-semitism complaints. the party had never experienced such a problem prior to the nutters who followed corbyn. your obsession with rubbishing the ehrc report says it all. but we've done all this many times before. | |
| And so as the loose-bowelled pigeon of time swoops low over the unsuspecting tourist of destiny, and the flatulent skunk of fate wanders into the air-conditioning system of eternity, I notice it's the end of the show |
| |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 19:41 - Jan 24 with 398 views | monytowbray |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 19:10 - Jan 24 by Darth_Koont |
I’ll repeat: What is your evidence?
Put up or shut up. |
Evidence would mean having to accept potentially being wrong or asking uncomfortable questions so that’ll be avoided.
He knows the down arrows will boil your piss though. | |
| |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 19:45 - Jan 24 with 390 views | Darth_Koont |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 19:20 - Jan 24 by lowhouseblue |
220 cases were put to the ehrc as part of its investigation. one of the problems it found was that labour under corbyn couldn't even quantify the number of anti-semitism complaints. the party had never experienced such a problem prior to the nutters who followed corbyn. your obsession with rubbishing the ehrc report says it all. but we've done all this many times before. |
I’m not rubbishing the report. I’m saying it didn’t report a rise in antisemitism under Corbyn.
As you well know.
They received a deluge of complaints from a number of bad faith actors some from a decade or more before. Because it became a project for many of them. It was so transparent why some of these vigilantes suddenly decided to look for anything and everything when Corbyn came in but not before – and it’s disingenuous to suggest otherwise.
A vast majority of the complaints were thrown out or not considered antisemitic. There were, of course, a number of genuine cases that were rightly dealt with.
But again you know this – or should do if you were remotely interested in the evidence as opposed to the opportunity to smear and discredit.
History will not be kind to you and the other bad faith actors. In fact, I feel it’s already started to turn. Nobody with any credibility backs the biggest smears anymore and they prefer to argue the softer accusation that Corbyn wasn’t an antisemite but didn’t do enough about the crisis.
I think that’s also misreading what was actually going on and the level of bad faith and even sabotage in Labour HQ. But we’ll cross that bridge when the long-overdue Forde report comes out and see what it says or omits. | |
| |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 20:04 - Jan 24 with 366 views | Darth_Koont |
| They were probably just being critical of the Pakistani government. on 19:41 - Jan 24 by monytowbray |
Evidence would mean having to accept potentially being wrong or asking uncomfortable questions so that’ll be avoided.
He knows the down arrows will boil your piss though. |
No, I enjoy them.
They’re pretty much all he has. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
