| Blubbers 08:18 - Feb 2 with 4193 views | chicoazul |
When’s he being allowed back then? |  |
| |  |
| Blubbers on 12:27 - Feb 2 with 786 views | FifeITFC |
| Blubbers on 12:10 - Feb 2 by N2_Blue |
Indeed this
Those who never want him to return really need to ask themselves why they get so riled by a poster on a message board. It's not healthy and I'd say says more about you than it does Fishers. |
It's not about being "riled" or anything unhealthy, he just spoils the forums with his incessent posts and if you disagree he just throws his toys out of the pram.
And as for the person who said he's "better than Makin", I never said he wasn't. |  |
| |
| Blubbers on 12:52 - Feb 2 with 708 views | Illinoisblue |
He’s available on twitter should you need a dose of bluster and outrage. |  |
| |
| Blubbers on 12:56 - Feb 2 with 708 views | J2BLUE |
| Blubbers on 12:27 - Feb 2 by FifeITFC |
It's not about being "riled" or anything unhealthy, he just spoils the forums with his incessent posts and if you disagree he just throws his toys out of the pram.
And as for the person who said he's "better than Makin", I never said he wasn't. |
This. Bring the two posters named in this thread back and this site becomes intolerable. |  |
| |
| Blubbers on 12:57 - Feb 2 with 701 views | MerseyBlue |
| Blubbers on 11:36 - Feb 2 by chicoazul |
Just block people if they make you feel like that? |
I still do have him blocked. How many threads were created in response to his constant wind-up act? He wanted to troll people, he was successful and he made the forum a more fractious place. Even when he was right, he wasn't content with that - he just wanted to wind people up, which he did time and time again. |  |
| "Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience." | | Poll: | Who will be the winner? |
| |
| Blubbers on 13:29 - Feb 2 with 640 views | MattinLondon |
| Blubbers on 12:57 - Feb 2 by MerseyBlue |
I still do have him blocked. How many threads were created in response to his constant wind-up act? He wanted to troll people, he was successful and he made the forum a more fractious place. Even when he was right, he wasn't content with that - he just wanted to wind people up, which he did time and time again. |
Which is all well and good if he were able to take return fire … |  | | |
| Blubbers on 13:36 - Feb 2 with 620 views | footers |
| Blubbers on 12:56 - Feb 2 by J2BLUE |
This. Bring the two posters named in this thread back and this site becomes intolerable. |
The latter day Sprucey was more a reaction to a certain individual's constant trolling, especially on sensitive matters.
Did it go too far? Probably. But if you take a seal and hit it very hard in the face every day for six weeks, you may turn it into a rather fetching hat.
Free Spruce and unleash the beast. |  |
| |
| Blubbers on 13:40 - Feb 2 with 593 views | witchdoctor |
| Blubbers on 13:36 - Feb 2 by footers |
The latter day Sprucey was more a reaction to a certain individual's constant trolling, especially on sensitive matters.
Did it go too far? Probably. But if you take a seal and hit it very hard in the face every day for six weeks, you may turn it into a rather fetching hat.
Free Spruce and unleash the beast. |
nahhhh… better place without him… |  | | |
| Blubbers on 13:40 - Feb 2 with 590 views | Ryorry |
| Blubbers on 12:57 - Feb 2 by MerseyBlue |
I still do have him blocked. How many threads were created in response to his constant wind-up act? He wanted to troll people, he was successful and he made the forum a more fractious place. Even when he was right, he wasn't content with that - he just wanted to wind people up, which he did time and time again. |
And at worst made the board unreadable; at best unappealing - I remember one morning when he started at least 5 or 6 threads, all spamming the same negative thing.
Pretty fundamentally damaging to this site's owners in terms of readership, views, appeal to advertisers etc. He had as little respect for them as for the rest of us. I found many of his football posts really interesting & enjoyed those, but if he couldn't or wouldn't get the fundamentals of how this site is able to exist, it's untenable for him to be on here. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Blubbers on 13:41 - Feb 2 with 586 views | Darth_Koont |
| Blubbers on 13:29 - Feb 2 by MattinLondon |
Which is all well and good if he were able to take return fire … |
Although, not convinced that wasn’t all part of his obsession with attention-seeking.
He loved the attention of trolling and starting multiple threads. And loved the grandstanding of outrage (mock or real) when people responded.
I know it’s better for the forum not having him around, but I think it might even be better for him. |  |
| |
| Blubbers on 13:42 - Feb 2 with 576 views | Stu_Magoo |
I vote never. |  |
| THIS IS DEMOC-RRRRRRR-ACY MANIFEST! |
| |
| Blubbers on 13:43 - Feb 2 with 565 views | footers |
| Blubbers on 13:40 - Feb 2 by witchdoctor |
nahhhh… better place without him… |
Is this not a Christian country, Sir? Should we not forgive others' trespasses as the good Lord forgives ours? | |
| |
| Blubbers on 13:43 - Feb 2 with 565 views | clive_baker |
| Blubbers on 13:40 - Feb 2 by Ryorry |
And at worst made the board unreadable; at best unappealing - I remember one morning when he started at least 5 or 6 threads, all spamming the same negative thing.
Pretty fundamentally damaging to this site's owners in terms of readership, views, appeal to advertisers etc. He had as little respect for them as for the rest of us. I found many of his football posts really interesting & enjoyed those, but if he couldn't or wouldn't get the fundamentals of how this site is able to exist, it's untenable for him to be on here. |
He was so so tedious. Really hard to believe he was a full grown adult and behaving like that.
Much better place without him. I cant think of any examples where the board hasn't improved as a result of Phil getting his ban hammer out, they're normally justified. |  |
| |
| Blubbers on 13:45 - Feb 2 with 552 views | MattinLondon |
| Blubbers on 13:41 - Feb 2 by Darth_Koont |
Although, not convinced that wasn’t all part of his obsession with attention-seeking.
He loved the attention of trolling and starting multiple threads. And loved the grandstanding of outrage (mock or real) when people responded.
I know it’s better for the forum not having him around, but I think it might even be better for him. |
You’re definitely right.
Being fair to him there were a couple of posts aimed at him that were a bit too personal. I remember someone accusing him of drinking too much and neglecting his family which was under the belt.
I think I might have gone in two-footed on him as well which I regret. | | | |
| Blubbers on 13:45 - Feb 2 with 549 views | witchdoctor |
| Blubbers on 13:43 - Feb 2 by footers |
Is this not a Christian country, Sir? Should we not forgive others' trespasses as the good Lord forgives ours? |
by that token…I’ll see your Spruce and raise you a Benters….😉 | | | |
| Blubbers on 13:46 - Feb 2 with 548 views | jeera |
Don't see the point of threads like these really.
People queueing up to take swipes at other people they've never met.
There was plenty of time to disagree with the posters mentioned when they were using the board without waiting for them to leave to voice an opinion when they're not here to defend themselves.
All a bit off tbh. |  |
| |
| Blubbers on 13:46 - Feb 2 with 547 views | StokieBlue |
| Blubbers on 13:40 - Feb 2 by witchdoctor |
nahhhh… better place without him… |
What if some people think this is a better place without you?
I guess by your logic that would mean you should be banned.
SB |  | | |
| Blubbers on 13:46 - Feb 2 with 545 views | Ryorry |
| Blubbers on 13:40 - Feb 2 by witchdoctor |
nahhhh… better place without him… |
He actually left voluntarily anyway.
Unlike a few others, he had pretty good self-awareness, knew when he'd gone a bit ott, & was prepared to admit it.
He was basically a good poster (his long posts on the USA elections were brilliant, full of insight) who fell to P26's almost daily pseudo-innocent needling. | |
| |
| Blubbers on 13:48 - Feb 2 with 529 views | footers |
| Blubbers on 13:45 - Feb 2 by witchdoctor |
by that token…I’ll see your Spruce and raise you a Benters….😉 |
It's a deal. Bit like a Cold War spy exchange. | |
| |
| Blubbers on 13:49 - Feb 2 with 514 views | StokieBlue |
| Blubbers on 13:45 - Feb 2 by witchdoctor |
by that token…I’ll see your Spruce and raise you a Benters….😉 |
He's surely too busy manning the guns at the Chunnel to post on here?
SB | | | |
| Blubbers on 13:55 - Feb 2 with 464 views | witchdoctor |
| Blubbers on 13:46 - Feb 2 by StokieBlue |
What if some people think this is a better place without you?
I guess by your logic that would mean you should be banned.
SB |
it’s my opinion…which I hope I’m entitled too…but anyway it’s not mine or your opinion that’s counts is it?. | | | |
| Blubbers on 13:55 - Feb 2 with 463 views | Ewan_Oozami |
| Blubbers on 13:43 - Feb 2 by clive_baker |
He was so so tedious. Really hard to believe he was a full grown adult and behaving like that.
Much better place without him. I cant think of any examples where the board hasn't improved as a result of Phil getting his ban hammer out, they're normally justified. |
He has previously doxxed himself as a Chair of Governors at a Primary school which seems perfectly in keeping with my experiences of Chairs of Governors.... |  |
| |
| Blubbers on 13:57 - Feb 2 with 450 views | witchdoctor |
| Blubbers on 13:48 - Feb 2 by footers |
It's a deal. Bit like a Cold War spy exchange. |
ha ha…ok….meet you at checkpoint charlie…say about 6ish? | | | |
| Blubbers on 13:58 - Feb 2 with 446 views | jeera |
| Blubbers on 13:45 - Feb 2 by MattinLondon |
You’re definitely right.
Being fair to him there were a couple of posts aimed at him that were a bit too personal. I remember someone accusing him of drinking too much and neglecting his family which was under the belt.
I think I might have gone in two-footed on him as well which I regret. |
"I remember someone accusing him of drinking too much and neglecting his family which was under the belt."
100%. Those types of attempts to get personal should be an immediate yellow card. | |
| |
| Blubbers on 13:59 - Feb 2 with 423 views | witchdoctor |
| Blubbers on 13:58 - Feb 2 by jeera |
"I remember someone accusing him of drinking too much and neglecting his family which was under the belt."
100%. Those types of attempts to get personal should be an immediate yellow card. |
👠deffo | | | |
| Blubbers on 14:00 - Feb 2 with 417 views | MattinLondon |
| Blubbers on 13:46 - Feb 2 by StokieBlue |
What if some people think this is a better place without you?
I guess by your logic that would mean you should be banned.
SB |
The main difference being that- as far as I’m aware - witchdoctor has not deliberately tried to wind people up multiple times. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
