| The whole Matete thing 'we were never in for him' 20:04 - Feb 8 with 530 views | Simonds92 |
I dont think that's a good thing it just demonstrates another player hugely impressive that we've let slip. Much rather we were after him and he turned us down to atleast show we can identify a decent player. Instead we have Bakinson, who does look extremely limited. |  | | |  |
| The whole Matete thing 'we were never in for him' on 20:05 - Feb 8 with 506 views | J2BLUE |
What good would come of admitting it if we were?
Edit: Didn't realise he had gone to Sunderland [Post edited 8 Feb 2022 20:06]
|  |
| |
| The whole Matete thing 'we were never in for him' on 20:15 - Feb 8 with 386 views | FightingEssex |
Hugely impressive is a massive overstatement of a run of a mill League One player some have built up to be the new Hassan Kachloul. As for Bakinson, he's also played the bulk of his football in the lower leagues with most of it in League Two, what were you expecting? |  |
| |
| The whole Matete thing 'we were never in for him' on 20:22 - Feb 8 with 336 views | Simonds92 |
| The whole Matete thing 'we were never in for him' on 20:15 - Feb 8 by FightingEssex |
Hugely impressive is a massive overstatement of a run of a mill League One player some have built up to be the new Hassan Kachloul. As for Bakinson, he's also played the bulk of his football in the lower leagues with most of it in League Two, what were you expecting? |
Hugely impressive at league 1 level. Im not saying he's going to be playing champions league but Sunderland will get a nice return on their investment and he will be a higher end Championship player. In comparison re. Bakinson i was hoping our recruitment team have the ability to identify decent players, considering most of them have seen him up close and still decided to sign him worries me! | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
