| Abramovich 09:21 - Mar 10 with 3361 views | bluefunk |
Apparently is now on the sanctions list! Wonder what that means for Chelski |  | | |  |
| Abramovich on 09:22 - Mar 10 with 2180 views | Steve_M |
Hopefully it's very bad. |  |
| |
| Abramovich on 09:22 - Mar 10 with 2185 views | SitfcB |
[Post edited 10 Mar 2022 9:23]
|  |
| |
| Abramovich on 09:24 - Mar 10 with 2141 views | bluefunk |
| Abramovich on 09:22 - Mar 10 by SitfcB |
[Post edited 10 Mar 2022 9:23]
|
So that’s what it means - no more away fans at Stamford Bridge though?? [Post edited 10 Mar 2022 9:25]
| | | |
| Abramovich on 09:25 - Mar 10 with 2136 views | GlasgowBlue |
The taxpayers are going to make a loss on Lukaku. |  |
| |
| Abramovich on 09:33 - Mar 10 with 2033 views | BiGDonnie |
| Abramovich on 09:24 - Mar 10 by bluefunk |
So that’s what it means - no more away fans at Stamford Bridge though?? [Post edited 10 Mar 2022 9:25]
|
Gives them an advantage with no away fans allowed in. |  |
| |
| Abramovich on 09:38 - Mar 10 with 2005 views | ArnieM |
Well that’s not a shock is it . He saw this coming which is why he’s trying to recoup his money from Chelski. And I’m sorry but I don’t believe he’s handing all over in donations to the Ukrainian people either…. He’s a slippery as an eel that one! |  |
| |
| Abramovich on 09:42 - Mar 10 with 1978 views | chicoazul |
| Abramovich on 09:22 - Mar 10 by SitfcB |
[Post edited 10 Mar 2022 9:23]
|
Hahahahahhaha
Absolutely superb |  |
| |
| Abramovich on 09:43 - Mar 10 with 1972 views | tractordownsouth |
Brave move from the Tories. By sanctioning oligarchs and Chelsea fans, they’ve alienated half their voter base |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Abramovich on 09:49 - Mar 10 with 1932 views | Pinewoodblue |
| Abramovich on 09:43 - Mar 10 by tractordownsouth |
Brave move from the Tories. By sanctioning oligarchs and Chelsea fans, they’ve alienated half their voter base |
Do you think all those Chelsea fans, who helped Hunt to be elected, will start going to Portman Road? |  |
| |
| Abramovich on 09:50 - Mar 10 with 1924 views | ITFC_Forever |
| Abramovich on 09:38 - Mar 10 by ArnieM |
Well that’s not a shock is it . He saw this coming which is why he’s trying to recoup his money from Chelski. And I’m sorry but I don’t believe he’s handing all over in donations to the Ukrainian people either…. He’s a slippery as an eel that one! |
He didn't say he was handing over any profit to the Ukraine people... just that it would go to the victims of the war, so that would include on both sides. |  |
| |
| Abramovich on 09:50 - Mar 10 with 1924 views | BloomBlue |
Does that mean the tax payer will have pay Lukaku's £400k a weeks wages? |  | | |
| Abramovich on 09:51 - Mar 10 with 1914 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
Well that should have given him plenty of time to move his other assets out of the country! |  |
| |
| Abramovich on 09:54 - Mar 10 with 1892 views | HighgateBlue |
| Abramovich on 09:50 - Mar 10 by BloomBlue |
Does that mean the tax payer will have pay Lukaku's £400k a weeks wages? |
No. |  | | |
| Abramovich on 09:57 - Mar 10 with 1841 views | Churchman |
| Abramovich on 09:50 - Mar 10 by ITFC_Forever |
He didn't say he was handing over any profit to the Ukraine people... just that it would go to the victims of the war, so that would include on both sides. |
Victims of war would presumably have included a big bung to Putin. On the basis of him losing sleep, the worry, the need to shoot a few dissenters making him a victim too.
I’m glad it’s been done, but it should have been done at least a week ago. Better late than never.
My Chelsea chum thinks it’s all a conspiracy against Chelsea along with refereeing decisions. Always one for the big picture, my mate 😂 |  | | |
| Abramovich on 09:59 - Mar 10 with 1830 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| Abramovich on 09:50 - Mar 10 by BloomBlue |
Does that mean the tax payer will have pay Lukaku's £400k a weeks wages? |
All it really means is that RA won't be able to make any profit off Chelsea. The club is pretty self-sufficient anyway so not much is likely to change from that point of view. |  |
| |
| Abramovich on 10:03 - Mar 10 with 1770 views | HighgateBlue |
| Abramovich on 09:59 - Mar 10 by JammyDodgerrr |
All it really means is that RA won't be able to make any profit off Chelsea. The club is pretty self-sufficient anyway so not much is likely to change from that point of view. |
I would say that a total transfer ban and a ban on all further ticket sales is a pretty big change.
How self-sufficient is Chelsea if it can't sell players or tickets?
The government's statement is thus far light on detail, but taken literally it would imply that no away teams will be allowed fans at Stamford Bridge, which seems like an unfortunate unintended consequence. Maybe this will be a further, as yet unannounced, exception with this licence that's been referred to. | | | |
| Abramovich on 10:04 - Mar 10 with 1761 views | HighgateBlue |
| Abramovich on 09:25 - Mar 10 by GlasgowBlue |
The taxpayers are going to make a loss on Lukaku. |
What have the tax payers got to do with it? | | | |
| Abramovich on 10:04 - Mar 10 with 1759 views | hype313 |
| Abramovich on 09:22 - Mar 10 by SitfcB |
[Post edited 10 Mar 2022 9:23]
|
28k Season Ticket holders |  |
| |
| Abramovich on 10:05 - Mar 10 with 1758 views | stickymockwell |
| Abramovich on 09:22 - Mar 10 by SitfcB |
[Post edited 10 Mar 2022 9:23]
|
Surely that means they can't sell anything.
Programs, hotdogs, beer, replica kits etc |  |
| |
| Abramovich on 10:06 - Mar 10 with 1754 views | gordon |
| Abramovich on 09:59 - Mar 10 by JammyDodgerrr |
All it really means is that RA won't be able to make any profit off Chelsea. The club is pretty self-sufficient anyway so not much is likely to change from that point of view. |
Losses of £145m to 30/06/2021, and think the cumulative losses since Abramovich took over are still close to a billion, although they did make a profit a couple of times more recently. |  | | |
| Abramovich on 10:06 - Mar 10 with 1741 views | gordon |
| Abramovich on 10:03 - Mar 10 by HighgateBlue |
I would say that a total transfer ban and a ban on all further ticket sales is a pretty big change.
How self-sufficient is Chelsea if it can't sell players or tickets?
The government's statement is thus far light on detail, but taken literally it would imply that no away teams will be allowed fans at Stamford Bridge, which seems like an unfortunate unintended consequence. Maybe this will be a further, as yet unannounced, exception with this licence that's been referred to. |
Well, could just mean that the away fans don't have to pay? | | | |
| Abramovich on 10:07 - Mar 10 with 1747 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Abramovich on 09:22 - Mar 10 by SitfcB |
[Post edited 10 Mar 2022 9:23]
|
|  |
| |
| Abramovich on 10:08 - Mar 10 with 1728 views | textbackup |
| Abramovich on 10:05 - Mar 10 by stickymockwell |
Surely that means they can't sell anything.
Programs, hotdogs, beer, replica kits etc |
no away fans, no club shop, nothing.... ouch |  |
| |
| Abramovich on 10:08 - Mar 10 with 1729 views | stickymockwell |
| Abramovich on 10:05 - Mar 10 by stickymockwell |
Surely that means they can't sell anything.
Programs, hotdogs, beer, replica kits etc |
The point is to stop them bringing in any money so they could stop sponsorships and TV cash too and stop any of next seasons ST sales.
That would be a fuker for them | |
| |
| Abramovich on 10:11 - Mar 10 with 1696 views | HighgateBlue |
| Abramovich on 10:06 - Mar 10 by gordon |
Well, could just mean that the away fans don't have to pay? |
That would be class. I don't know if there's a Premier League rule that demands that a certain number of away tickets are made available, but if so, it might be that they are indeed forced to let them in for free. For everything else there's Mastercard... | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
