I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that 22:09 - May 9 with 1618 views | unstableblue | ... resignation offer and their BOLLOX story so far up the Daily Mail's frickin arse they might for once stop talking out of it. That rag has so much to answer for - a vile publication that feeds hate and mistrust, and has fundamentally damaged this country. Worse than The Sun. | |
| | |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 23:31 - May 9 with 1461 views | unstableblue | Although I would add that Starmer’s case and subsequent statements have veered a little close to dodgy. But of course nothing like the Johnson sphere of crapulous behaviour | |
| |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 15:02 - May 10 with 1160 views | ronnyd | Hasn't it been stated that Durham police don't do retrospective fines so Starmer is on pretty safe grounds? Doubt it would make any difference to Johnsons take anyway. He'll have to be pushed. | | | |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 16:01 - May 10 with 1086 views | itfcjoe |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 15:02 - May 10 by ronnyd | Hasn't it been stated that Durham police don't do retrospective fines so Starmer is on pretty safe grounds? Doubt it would make any difference to Johnsons take anyway. He'll have to be pushed. |
Durham police had shut the investigation down until it was on the front page of the Daily Mail for 12 days (don't they know there is a war going on.....) The Sun, The Mail, The Telegraph and The Express are just Tory papers - Starmer can't pander to them one bit. | |
| |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 17:27 - May 10 with 1007 views | Swansea_Blue |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 15:02 - May 10 by ronnyd | Hasn't it been stated that Durham police don't do retrospective fines so Starmer is on pretty safe grounds? Doubt it would make any difference to Johnsons take anyway. He'll have to be pushed. |
Durham Police themselves also said they wouldn't reinvestigate, and now they seemingly are. So I wouldn't ready too much into what they normally do or don't do or what they've said. It could easily change. Yes I suspect you're right that it wouldn't make any difference to Johnson either way. | |
| |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 17:34 - May 10 with 996 views | Oldsmoker |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 17:27 - May 10 by Swansea_Blue | Durham Police themselves also said they wouldn't reinvestigate, and now they seemingly are. So I wouldn't ready too much into what they normally do or don't do or what they've said. It could easily change. Yes I suspect you're right that it wouldn't make any difference to Johnson either way. |
There's a Tory politician who posted on Twitter that he thinks that for consistency sake the MET should investigate Beergate. The twitteratti has explained to him the concept of Police forces and the areas that they are reponsible for. https://www.indy100.com/politics/andrew-bridgen-met-police-beergate I posted this on another thread https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/may/10/damned-when-you-do-why-starmer- | |
| |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 17:57 - May 10 with 960 views | jeera |
"One person replied: “Durham is in Durham, you absolute casserole.”" | |
| |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 18:00 - May 10 with 956 views | Oldsmoker |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 17:57 - May 10 by jeera | "One person replied: “Durham is in Durham, you absolute casserole.”" |
I think that person misspelled a*sehole. | |
| |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 18:00 - May 10 with 952 views | jeera |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 18:00 - May 10 by Oldsmoker | I think that person misspelled a*sehole. |
It made me smile. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 18:19 - May 10 with 916 views | Swansea_Blue |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 17:57 - May 10 by jeera | "One person replied: “Durham is in Durham, you absolute casserole.”" |
"absolute casserole" and apparent perjurer. It's normally several years in prison for lying under oath to the courts, but seemingly Tory MPs and Ministers are only very rarely held accountable. https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/local-news/leicestershire-mp-lied-court- We all deserve better than this lot. | |
| |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 18:22 - May 10 with 907 views | Oldsmoker |
It's the MO of the right-wing press. Your guys a 5 so pull the opposition guy down to a 4. It will never change 'cos we end up with sh*te MP's. | |
| |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 18:40 - May 10 with 889 views | Darth_Koont |
I so hope Durham police do not give Starmer a fine.. and then we can SHOVE that on 17:57 - May 10 by jeera | "One person replied: “Durham is in Durham, you absolute casserole.”" |
“You absolute casserole” is going into the memory bank. Love it! | |
| |
| |