| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s 08:40 - May 19 with 1456 views | unstableblue |
I think Jackson is very good working the channels, and is good wide and critically is a great crosser.
Could he be one of the attacking high midfield two alongside Chaplin.
Would it be Chaplin left and Jackson right in this hair brained scheme?!
A mobile but physical striker, who knows where the goal is, to hold up play and feed these two?!
BOOM! |  |
| |  |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 08:41 - May 19 with 1448 views | itfcjoe |
No, that isn't how a 10 plays, and it isn't how Jackson plays - he likes to make his runs from in to out |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 08:47 - May 19 with 1411 views | BiGDonnie |
Jackson's not technical enough to play as a ten.
We need him running, shooting and crossing, that's it. |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 09:04 - May 19 with 1363 views | Romeo4 |
I don’t see Jackson in that role. I think he becomes an option for McKenna when we need a pact forward to stretch the opposition, making runs to provide space for our attacking midfielders/10s to operate and hurt teams.
If we continue to play in a similar way to last season I don’t think we need to play a ‘big’ centre forward (other than as a plan b option). Pigott and Bonne struggled in our side because we don’t provide the service they thrive on i.e. early crosses into the box.
The type of forward we would need would be a fox in the box type. An instinct for positioning themselves for low crosses, cut backs from bye line, and obviously a good finisher. Someone like Aguero would be good!!
Of our current squad I think Chaplin could probably play that role. Will be interesting to see the type of player McKenna is targeting. |  | | |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 09:08 - May 19 with 1348 views | Keno |
isnt two players having the same number against the rules and wont it confuse things where a substation needs to be made? |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 09:21 - May 19 with 1317 views | TRUE_BLUE123 |
Id like to see Edwards tried there |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 09:23 - May 19 with 1306 views | SomethingBlue |
Of all our attackers, Jackson is the last you'd use as a 10. |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 09:24 - May 19 with 1302 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Or we could just play Jackson in his actual position |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 09:26 - May 19 with 1290 views | HighgateBlue |
I've still got all my fingers and toes crossed for Celina to stay
 |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 10:03 - May 19 with 1225 views | jayessess |
I recall Jackson played as a wide forward away at Wimbledon, the first game he came back. I don't think it's how we'll line up habitually, but for sure it'll remain an option with Jackson in the squad. |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 10:40 - May 19 with 1129 views | BlueBlood90 |
Jackson is definitely not a number 10 in any way, shape or form.
We need him to use his pace to run in behind defences and play on the shoulder.
I think Chaplin deserves to start more next season. I always feel we have far more goal threat whenever he plays. |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 10:47 - May 19 with 1109 views | BasingstokeBlue |
> A mobile but physical striker, who knows where the goal is
There's a chap called Norwood who's just become available... |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 10:50 - May 19 with 1085 views | clive_baker |
I've got a feeling we'll abandon that next season, in favour of a front 2. |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 11:04 - May 19 with 1056 views | jayessess |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 10:47 - May 19 by BasingstokeBlue |
> A mobile but physical striker, who knows where the goal is
There's a chap called Norwood who's just become available... |
Also needs to be able to trap a ball, win headers and complete a 10-yard pass. | |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 11:23 - May 19 with 1014 views | textbackup |
Jackson is nowhere near good enough for that, absolutely miles off.
get him running once a ball is down the channels and i admit hes ok |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 14:39 - May 19 with 839 views | Kropotkin123 |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 09:08 - May 19 by Keno |
isnt two players having the same number against the rules and wont it confuse things where a substation needs to be made? |
He looks like a combination of a 9 and 10 to me. I think he is best as a 19. |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 15:13 - May 19 with 787 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
So, a number 10, that plays at number 7?
Is that it? |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 15:19 - May 19 with 780 views | SouperJim |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 09:23 - May 19 by SomethingBlue |
Of all our attackers, Jackson is the last you'd use as a 10. |
Quite, I mean he's not got as horrendous a tampoline touch as he used to have, but I still want to see him predominantly running onto the ball rather than trying to bring it with him. |  |
| |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 19:35 - May 19 with 635 views | cbower |
| Chaplin and Jackson as the two number 10s on 08:41 - May 19 by itfcjoe |
No, that isn't how a 10 plays, and it isn't how Jackson plays - he likes to make his runs from in to out |
Spot on Joe. A fundamental misuderstanding of what a no.10 is and Jackson is about as far away from a no.10 as we could get from a forward player. #Technical |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
