17 shots, 7 on target, apparently 09:33 - Aug 10 with 463 views | SamWhiteUK | Can anyone describe to me what those shots were like? Were we trying to walk the ball into the net? Was their keeper playing a blinder, or did we keep passing it to him? I've seen lots of people say our conversion rate is poor, and the numbers make it sound that way, but it's important to know what the chances were like. | | | | |
17 shots, 7 on target, apparently on 09:51 - Aug 10 with 413 views | andytown | From sideways in top tier of pioneer stand, 1st half some of the ones on target weren’t hit/headed hard so comfortable saves for the keeper. Humphreys had a few from around the edge of the box and hit them over, but would say he needed to lift them as it was congested in front of goal. | | | |
17 shots, 7 on target, apparently on 10:00 - Aug 10 with 366 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
17 shots, 7 on target, apparently on 09:51 - Aug 10 by andytown | From sideways in top tier of pioneer stand, 1st half some of the ones on target weren’t hit/headed hard so comfortable saves for the keeper. Humphreys had a few from around the edge of the box and hit them over, but would say he needed to lift them as it was congested in front of goal. |
That seemed to be a feature v FGR too, a fair few shots in the first half that, [insert name here], didn't quite get hold of properly. | |
| |
17 shots, 7 on target, apparently on 10:15 - Aug 10 with 334 views | braveblue |
17 shots, 7 on target, apparently on 09:51 - Aug 10 by andytown | From sideways in top tier of pioneer stand, 1st half some of the ones on target weren’t hit/headed hard so comfortable saves for the keeper. Humphreys had a few from around the edge of the box and hit them over, but would say he needed to lift them as it was congested in front of goal. |
Humphrey’s two were from about 10 yards and were side foot sitters. He a young, promising player. It happens. | | | |
| |