| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in 17:36 - Aug 27 with 4302 views | Matt_Netherlands |
Someone calling him out because he said we weren’t threatening enough from corners ha |  | | |  |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 17:39 - Aug 27 with 3411 views | leftback |
I feel mick mills is losing the plot poor old boy, waffles on about a load of baloney, contradicting himself every other sentence! |  | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 17:46 - Aug 27 with 3336 views | cbower |
The caller was a prat |  |
| |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 17:48 - Aug 27 with 3314 views | SitfcB |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 17:39 - Aug 27 by leftback |
I feel mick mills is losing the plot poor old boy, waffles on about a load of baloney, contradicting himself every other sentence! |
If he said we weren’t threatening from corners then he’s absolutely right. [Post edited 27 Aug 2022 18:43]
|  |
| |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 17:53 - Aug 27 with 3251 views | NthQldITFC |
If I saw someone talking to Sir Mick Mills disrespectfully like that, I'd kick them in the Dominics. |  |
| |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:07 - Aug 27 with 3147 views | Matt_Netherlands |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 17:48 - Aug 27 by SitfcB |
If he said we weren’t threatening from corners then he’s absolutely right. [Post edited 27 Aug 2022 18:43]
|
Pretty much word for word what he said…. To which some idiot took a disliking and called in accusing Mick of being far too negative all the time and never being happy.
Granted MM might not be dancing on the ceiling at all times, but still! MM then compared the caller to Shambert which put him in his place. | | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:14 - Aug 27 with 3071 views | Meadowlark |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 17:48 - Aug 27 by SitfcB |
If he said we weren’t threatening from corners then he’s absolutely right. [Post edited 27 Aug 2022 18:43]
|
You mean "he's" As in "he is." The apostrophe is used as it's a contraction and a letter is removed.
"His," means something belonging to him, so in the context that you have used it, it makes no sense at all.
As a youngster, and therefore someone who never reads anything, you've probably heard people say "he's" and assumed they said "his." It's an easy mistake for an illiterate person to make.
I'm not judging. I'm just correcting. |  | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:21 - Aug 27 with 3012 views | TheMoralMajority |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:14 - Aug 27 by Meadowlark |
You mean "he's" As in "he is." The apostrophe is used as it's a contraction and a letter is removed.
"His," means something belonging to him, so in the context that you have used it, it makes no sense at all.
As a youngster, and therefore someone who never reads anything, you've probably heard people say "he's" and assumed they said "his." It's an easy mistake for an illiterate person to make.
I'm not judging. I'm just correcting. |
Sure. Or someone made a typo on the internet.
¯_(ツ)_/¯ |  |
| ...but do signatures really work? |
| |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:26 - Aug 27 with 2949 views | Wonky |
He's right though, though they excite the crowd corners are overated.
European top divisions, since year 2000.
Only 16% result in an attempt on goal
Just 7% result in a shot on target [Post edited 27 Aug 2022 18:27]
|  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:30 - Aug 27 with 2900 views | cressi |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:26 - Aug 27 by Wonky |
He's right though, though they excite the crowd corners are overated.
European top divisions, since year 2000.
Only 16% result in an attempt on goal
Just 7% result in a shot on target [Post edited 27 Aug 2022 18:27]
|
Nathan the idiot
Clueless moron of course to be successful you need to score from deadball situations to help be successful. | | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:42 - Aug 27 with 2818 views | SitfcB |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:14 - Aug 27 by Meadowlark |
You mean "he's" As in "he is." The apostrophe is used as it's a contraction and a letter is removed.
"His," means something belonging to him, so in the context that you have used it, it makes no sense at all.
As a youngster, and therefore someone who never reads anything, you've probably heard people say "he's" and assumed they said "his." It's an easy mistake for an illiterate person to make.
I'm not judging. I'm just correcting. |
F**k off. Oooo someone made a typo. Get a life. | |
| |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:54 - Aug 27 with 2735 views | Wonky |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:30 - Aug 27 by cressi |
Nathan the idiot
Clueless moron of course to be successful you need to score from deadball situations to help be successful. |
Yes, free kicks, but not corners. The stats really don't lie, corners don't produce goals, as much as people expect. | | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:55 - Aug 27 with 2733 views | Mullet |
Anyone calling into Radio talk shows should be hung up on in fairness. |  |
| |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:58 - Aug 27 with 2700 views | Wonky |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:55 - Aug 27 by Mullet |
Anyone calling into Radio talk shows should be hung up on in fairness. |
That I certainly do agree with. | | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 19:01 - Aug 27 with 2672 views | Matt_Netherlands |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:55 - Aug 27 by Mullet |
Anyone calling into Radio talk shows should be hung up on in fairness. |
Unless your name is Brian and you live in a small village just outside of Woodbridge. | | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 19:10 - Aug 27 with 2593 views | BlueBadger |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:55 - Aug 27 by Mullet |
Anyone calling into Radio talk shows should be hung up on in fairness. |
Innit. It's for people who find TWTD news comments too intellectually intimidating. |  |
| |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 19:11 - Aug 27 with 2580 views | 44_not_out |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 17:46 - Aug 27 by cbower |
The caller was a prat |
Agree, he was.
But MM is a bit of a mood hoover. We were nowhere near as bad as he was trying to make out | | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 20:23 - Aug 27 with 2332 views | ACP84 |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 17:39 - Aug 27 by leftback |
I feel mick mills is losing the plot poor old boy, waffles on about a load of baloney, contradicting himself every other sentence! |
As a player, he was amazing for us - as a pundit he's utter bobbins.
Get rid of him and brongnin some younger pundit, football has moved on from his day.
His managerial career was crap too, time to move him on |  | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 20:31 - Aug 27 with 2279 views | FromReuserWithLove |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 18:54 - Aug 27 by Wonky |
Yes, free kicks, but not corners. The stats really don't lie, corners don't produce goals, as much as people expect. |
The point was if we're not winning corners it's because we aren't putting enough pressure on the opposition in the the final third. Attacking pressure forces desperate defending which results in high corner wins. He wasn't saying we should be winning corners to score more goals. He is of course totally correct and not sure how this point was missed? Why did the caller just labour on winning corners and scoring from corners? Why did some jumped up Herbert try and lecture Mick Mills on the basics of football? Embarrassing. [Post edited 27 Aug 2022 20:37]
|  | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 20:46 - Aug 27 with 2184 views | Wonky |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 20:31 - Aug 27 by FromReuserWithLove |
The point was if we're not winning corners it's because we aren't putting enough pressure on the opposition in the the final third. Attacking pressure forces desperate defending which results in high corner wins. He wasn't saying we should be winning corners to score more goals. He is of course totally correct and not sure how this point was missed? Why did the caller just labour on winning corners and scoring from corners? Why did some jumped up Herbert try and lecture Mick Mills on the basics of football? Embarrassing. [Post edited 27 Aug 2022 20:37]
|
Yep, I caught the end of the conversation and the guy was definitely out of order arguing like that. | | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 20:55 - Aug 27 with 2115 views | Wickets |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 20:23 - Aug 27 by ACP84 |
As a player, he was amazing for us - as a pundit he's utter bobbins.
Get rid of him and brongnin some younger pundit, football has moved on from his day.
His managerial career was crap too, time to move him on |
MM seemed to think we were poorish apart from the last 10 minutes or so and only deserved a point but he had earlier said we did and have been playing well ! Make of that what you will but I think he was just having a waffle to fill in time before KM came on . Yes all respect to MM for his superb playing career . |  | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 20:58 - Aug 27 with 2097 views | xrayspecs |
Though Mills was spot on.
Nathan (?) either was not listening to what MM said, or does not understand football.
For all the possession we had, we hardly tested their keeper in the first 75 minutes of the game. An indicator of our lack of chances on goal was us not having a corner until mid second half. Fair enough.
Somehow numpty boy confused this point with our track record of scoring from corners last season. MM was not saying we should aim to win more corners, simply that we need to threaten the Barnsley goal more often. | | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 20:59 - Aug 27 with 2078 views | jeera |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 20:23 - Aug 27 by ACP84 |
As a player, he was amazing for us - as a pundit he's utter bobbins.
Get rid of him and brongnin some younger pundit, football has moved on from his day.
His managerial career was crap too, time to move him on |
"Amazing for us".
What with captaining Ipswich Town to FA Cup and UEFA cup trophies.
Playing for the national side and being made captain there too.
Fair to say he probably knows a thing or two yes. |  |
| |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 20:59 - Aug 27 with 2079 views | xrayspecs |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 20:31 - Aug 27 by FromReuserWithLove |
The point was if we're not winning corners it's because we aren't putting enough pressure on the opposition in the the final third. Attacking pressure forces desperate defending which results in high corner wins. He wasn't saying we should be winning corners to score more goals. He is of course totally correct and not sure how this point was missed? Why did the caller just labour on winning corners and scoring from corners? Why did some jumped up Herbert try and lecture Mick Mills on the basics of football? Embarrassing. [Post edited 27 Aug 2022 20:37]
|
This. | | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 21:12 - Aug 27 with 1997 views | DJR |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 20:58 - Aug 27 by xrayspecs |
Though Mills was spot on.
Nathan (?) either was not listening to what MM said, or does not understand football.
For all the possession we had, we hardly tested their keeper in the first 75 minutes of the game. An indicator of our lack of chances on goal was us not having a corner until mid second half. Fair enough.
Somehow numpty boy confused this point with our track record of scoring from corners last season. MM was not saying we should aim to win more corners, simply that we need to threaten the Barnsley goal more often. |
This too. |  | | |
| Thought old Mick Mills was about to snap then on the phone in on 21:17 - Aug 27 with 1969 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
That wasn't what MM was saying, though.
What he did say was that we didn't earn any corners for the first 60 minutes (or something like that) and that showed we weren't putting their defence under enough pressure as corners result from the defence being under pressure. The caller misinterpreted this as MM saying we should be looking to earn more corners. The caller then said that was wrong because we don't threaten from them anyway.
Ultimately MM was right and the caller didn't get the point he was making.
That was the way I understood what heard of it all anyway. The caller was a little too abrupt in his disagreement for me. Needed to listen a little more carefully to what MM was actually saying. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
