| Jackson to start (n/t) 14:01 - Sep 3 with 3862 views | FrimleyBlue |
[Post edited 3 Sep 2022 14:01]
|  |
| |  |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:23 - Sep 3 with 838 views | textbackup |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 16:04 - Sep 3 by StokieBlue |
Terrible excuse for a poster.
How he persists I've got no idea.
Can't post coherently, not smart with his opinions and doesn't often make much sense.
SB |
Lol what a mess, posting with a mask on no doubt |  |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:28 - Sep 3 with 808 views | StokieBlue |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:23 - Sep 3 by textbackup |
Lol what a mess, posting with a mask on no doubt |
I agree, your post was a total mess, as it almost always is and I'm sure my reply went a little over your head.
It's excellent how you really get behind our players and how you obviously trust McKenna's judgement so much.
SB [Post edited 3 Sep 2022 17:33]
|  | | |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:40 - Sep 3 with 762 views | textbackup |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:28 - Sep 3 by StokieBlue |
I agree, your post was a total mess, as it almost always is and I'm sure my reply went a little over your head.
It's excellent how you really get behind our players and how you obviously trust McKenna's judgement so much.
SB [Post edited 3 Sep 2022 17:33]
|
Cor yeah miles over.
Fully support the players, jackson is poor. Surprises me he continues to get picked. But I trust McKenna.
What part you struggling with?
I can both trust the best manager we’ve had in years, and not rate a player. | |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:41 - Sep 3 with 761 views | J2BLUE |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 16:01 - Sep 3 by textbackup |
Terrible excuse for a striker.
How he gets picked I’ve no idea
Can’t control a ball, not smart with movement, doesn’t win headers, shooting poor. |
The stats suggest he's decent under McKenna. His pace burned them before he went off. Then the cavalry came on. A clear tactic seems to be bringing fresh legs on. The 5 subs is a massive advantage over teams like that. |  |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:46 - Sep 3 with 746 views | Zapers |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:28 - Sep 3 by StokieBlue |
I agree, your post was a total mess, as it almost always is and I'm sure my reply went a little over your head.
It's excellent how you really get behind our players and how you obviously trust McKenna's judgement so much.
SB [Post edited 3 Sep 2022 17:33]
|
Burgess? |  | | |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:51 - Sep 3 with 734 views | witchdoctor |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:23 - Sep 3 by textbackup |
Lol what a mess, posting with a mask on no doubt |
😂😂😂 |  | | |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:02 - Sep 3 with 721 views | textbackup |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:41 - Sep 3 by J2BLUE |
The stats suggest he's decent under McKenna. His pace burned them before he went off. Then the cavalry came on. A clear tactic seems to be bringing fresh legs on. The 5 subs is a massive advantage over teams like that. |
I see why KMc likes him in certain games, but I don’t have to rate him or enjoy seeing him out there.
Had maybe our best chances at 0-0, and failed to convert, not saying any other striker we have would have… but I’m not a fan | |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:18 - Sep 3 with 706 views | Chrisd |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:02 - Sep 3 by textbackup |
I see why KMc likes him in certain games, but I don’t have to rate him or enjoy seeing him out there.
Had maybe our best chances at 0-0, and failed to convert, not saying any other striker we have would have… but I’m not a fan |
I feel the same. Some support for KJ’s displays, but I find I’m rarely impressed with him. KM obviously sees something in him and that’s why he gets paid well to be our manager and I’m just another keyboard warrior passing comment on a fans’ forum. [Post edited 3 Sep 2022 18:20]
| |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:23 - Sep 3 with 695 views | textbackup |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:18 - Sep 3 by Chrisd |
I feel the same. Some support for KJ’s displays, but I find I’m rarely impressed with him. KM obviously sees something in him and that’s why he gets paid well to be our manager and I’m just another keyboard warrior passing comment on a fans’ forum. [Post edited 3 Sep 2022 18:20]
|
I know right, how dare we have an opinion on a player.
FWIW I rate 99% of the squad, I don’t think Harper will amount to anything here, while on the subject | |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:24 - Sep 3 with 694 views | StokieBlue |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:46 - Sep 3 by Zapers |
Burgess? |
That's a ridiculous false equivalence given I haven't spent a ridiculous number of threads digging him out. I mentioned him in one thread and even in that on said I hoped he did well. Texters and others pile on Jackson all the time without the good will.
Now why don't you stop following me around the board and enjoy some pickles.
SB | | | |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:32 - Sep 3 with 682 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 14:23 - Sep 3 by Tonytown |
I’m pretty sure he won’t be reading this thread though.
I’d love him to score hatfuls of goals for us, but like others I’ve not seen enough from him in his time here to see why he is getting game time for us when we have the option to get better players.
Uppa towen |
More importantly, our manager has seen enough from him and trusts him to do the job asked of him. Anyone who thinks they know better than McKenna is having a laugh. |  |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:36 - Sep 3 with 672 views | textbackup |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:32 - Sep 3 by Swansea_Blue |
More importantly, our manager has seen enough from him and trusts him to do the job asked of him. Anyone who thinks they know better than McKenna is having a laugh. |
I’ve not seen a single suggestion of anyone knowing better than the manager.
Game of opinions.
If he scores I’ll cheer, during the game when I’m there I’ll support him and cheer him on. Not sure what is so wrong with a support not rating a player | |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:45 - Sep 3 with 645 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 16:01 - Sep 3 by textbackup |
Terrible excuse for a striker.
How he gets picked I’ve no idea
Can’t control a ball, not smart with movement, doesn’t win headers, shooting poor. |
That says more about your judgement that Jackson. If you can’t see what he brings, there’s no hope. He’s like Matty Holland or the budget version Skuse for being a barometer of whether people understand the game.
Sure he’s not Haaland, but for this league and our style he’s an ideal fit. | |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:48 - Sep 3 with 638 views | Swansea_Blue |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:36 - Sep 3 by textbackup |
I’ve not seen a single suggestion of anyone knowing better than the manager.
Game of opinions.
If he scores I’ll cheer, during the game when I’m there I’ll support him and cheer him on. Not sure what is so wrong with a support not rating a player |
It is a game of opinions, and luckily McKenna’s hold more weight than yours or mine. | |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:50 - Sep 3 with 632 views | Coastalblue |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:45 - Sep 3 by Swansea_Blue |
That says more about your judgement that Jackson. If you can’t see what he brings, there’s no hope. He’s like Matty Holland or the budget version Skuse for being a barometer of whether people understand the game.
Sure he’s not Haaland, but for this league and our style he’s an ideal fit. |
Well said, he's never going to be prolific. especially not the way we use him but he's an important part of the first team picture, and plays unselfishly to help the team.
Not quite sure what some people hope from him, he is what he is, but what he is works well for us. |  |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 19:00 - Sep 3 with 620 views | textbackup |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:45 - Sep 3 by Swansea_Blue |
That says more about your judgement that Jackson. If you can’t see what he brings, there’s no hope. He’s like Matty Holland or the budget version Skuse for being a barometer of whether people understand the game.
Sure he’s not Haaland, but for this league and our style he’s an ideal fit. |
I’m sure you’ll read elsewhere on this thread, from me, where I’ve said I see why the manager picks him at times. | |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 19:11 - Sep 3 with 607 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 17:23 - Sep 3 by textbackup |
Lol what a mess, posting with a mask on no doubt |
Not sure that going macho over covid is a good look!
The Jackson hate shown by some is a bit much too (not aimed at you btw) and there is a certain type of fan that seems to need a bogeyman irrespective of results.
On a side note, those Barnsley fans must love Norwood today. |  |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 19:20 - Sep 3 with 597 views | textbackup |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 19:11 - Sep 3 by BanksterDebtSlave |
Not sure that going macho over covid is a good look!
The Jackson hate shown by some is a bit much too (not aimed at you btw) and there is a certain type of fan that seems to need a bogeyman irrespective of results.
On a side note, those Barnsley fans must love Norwood today. |
I’m purely doing it at old ‘SB’ who seems to follow me around here, digging at anything.
Silly really considering it’s he that needs to take breaks from an Internet forum, you’d think he’d learn to chill a bit.
Anyway, back to Jackson. The manager clearly rates him for certain games, and in certain roles, I’m nobody, just a fan that is giving an opinion on what I see. Yet support him during games, and give credit where it due.
And FWIW ladapo has the same number of goals, but I rate him. It’s no big deal really. Just ‘SB’ getting excited
And yes, barnsley fans must be backtracking a bit. And shows they are no mugs and our point Vs them was decent | |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 19:26 - Sep 3 with 585 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 19:20 - Sep 3 by textbackup |
I’m purely doing it at old ‘SB’ who seems to follow me around here, digging at anything.
Silly really considering it’s he that needs to take breaks from an Internet forum, you’d think he’d learn to chill a bit.
Anyway, back to Jackson. The manager clearly rates him for certain games, and in certain roles, I’m nobody, just a fan that is giving an opinion on what I see. Yet support him during games, and give credit where it due.
And FWIW ladapo has the same number of goals, but I rate him. It’s no big deal really. Just ‘SB’ getting excited
And yes, barnsley fans must be backtracking a bit. And shows they are no mugs and our point Vs them was decent |
Fair enough and I get it....he's gone a bit daveU with me having accused me of the lost puppy thing! Carry on!! | |
| |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 20:32 - Sep 3 with 537 views | Zapers |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 18:24 - Sep 3 by StokieBlue |
That's a ridiculous false equivalence given I haven't spent a ridiculous number of threads digging him out. I mentioned him in one thread and even in that on said I hoped he did well. Texters and others pile on Jackson all the time without the good will.
Now why don't you stop following me around the board and enjoy some pickles.
SB |
You’re obsessed with pickles, no wonder you blow so much hot air. | | | |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 21:59 - Sep 3 with 487 views | StokieBlue |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 19:20 - Sep 3 by textbackup |
I’m purely doing it at old ‘SB’ who seems to follow me around here, digging at anything.
Silly really considering it’s he that needs to take breaks from an Internet forum, you’d think he’d learn to chill a bit.
Anyway, back to Jackson. The manager clearly rates him for certain games, and in certain roles, I’m nobody, just a fan that is giving an opinion on what I see. Yet support him during games, and give credit where it due.
And FWIW ladapo has the same number of goals, but I rate him. It’s no big deal really. Just ‘SB’ getting excited
And yes, barnsley fans must be backtracking a bit. And shows they are no mugs and our point Vs them was decent |
This is simply a lie but it's not surprising given your general standard of posting. I barely respond to you and only did in this thread because you made a pathetic and unwarranted attack on Jackson. Why don't you go read McKenna comments on Jackson after the match, someone who knows what they are talking about.
You've certainly changed your tune from when you said that you checked my posts first to make sure you had things right on scientific matters.
You've had a really poor fall from grace, you should have a think about that and maybe come back a new and better poster because at the moment you dishing up absolute rubbish.
SB | | | |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 22:15 - Sep 3 with 463 views | BanksterDebtSlave |
| Jackson to start (n/t) on 21:59 - Sep 3 by StokieBlue |
This is simply a lie but it's not surprising given your general standard of posting. I barely respond to you and only did in this thread because you made a pathetic and unwarranted attack on Jackson. Why don't you go read McKenna comments on Jackson after the match, someone who knows what they are talking about.
You've certainly changed your tune from when you said that you checked my posts first to make sure you had things right on scientific matters.
You've had a really poor fall from grace, you should have a think about that and maybe come back a new and better poster because at the moment you dishing up absolute rubbish.
SB |
Is this the stage before you declare a poster "unsalvageable?"
Ps....has there ever been a good fall from grace? | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
