| And to top it off 09:28 - Dec 3 with 9320 views | textbackup |
We had a convicted nonce working the north stand as a steward lastnight.
Great evening Town |  |
| |  |
| And to top it off on 14:29 - Dec 3 with 3124 views | NeedhamChris |
| And to top it off on 14:16 - Dec 3 by Ryorry |
This thread is about DRB checking, so is that.
You might be looking for a fight, but I'm not, & am off outside to plant some daff bulbs. |
And to clarify - asking you to justify how you've leapt from criminal convictions of sex offenders to trans people and gender recognition as a 'related' article isn't looking for a fight. Seems a reasonable question. [Post edited 3 Dec 2022 14:29]
|  |
| |
| And to top it off on 14:31 - Dec 3 with 3104 views | Zx1988 |
| And to top it off on 14:29 - Dec 3 by NeedhamChris |
And to clarify - asking you to justify how you've leapt from criminal convictions of sex offenders to trans people and gender recognition as a 'related' article isn't looking for a fight. Seems a reasonable question. [Post edited 3 Dec 2022 14:29]
|
Are you okay?
You appear to have gone in off the deep end somewhat at a perfectly innocuous aside. | |
| |
| And to top it off on 14:31 - Dec 3 with 3087 views | Lord_Lucan |
| And to top it off on 13:13 - Dec 3 by backwaywhen |
That was excellent work by the Town fan ………. Well done , and burn in hell the perv . |
I agree that it was handled very well, it would be quite easy to lose your rag but the lad handled it superbly. |  |
| |
| And to top it off on 15:18 - Dec 3 with 2974 views | Ryorry |
| And to top it off on 14:18 - Dec 3 by NeedhamChris |
Did you read the article you linked to? It has absolutely nothing to do with criminal records disclosure and is instead about trans people and the declaration of their gender identity |
Have you read it? It's about staff who check applicants not just for gender identity but for their suitability for jobs generally (they are in HR); and was addressed to someone well known for their interest in legal issues, justice, and care + fair play to all.
The tweet attached to it originally explored what that might mean re people who could potentially escape being named on the sex offenders register by changing their name. [Post edited 3 Dec 2022 15:26]
|  |
| |
| And to top it off on 09:05 - Dec 7 with 2218 views | textbackup |
some weights, a rope, and very deep water really is the best thing for this piece of sht | |
| |
| And to top it off on 11:02 - Dec 7 with 2145 views | itfcjoe |
What do you do with someone like this, every day out of prison is another opportunity to ruin someone elses life |  |
| |
| And to top it off on 11:15 - Dec 7 with 2110 views | ArnoldMoorhen |
| And to top it off on 14:16 - Dec 3 by Ryorry |
This thread is about DRB checking, so is that.
You might be looking for a fight, but I'm not, & am off outside to plant some daff bulbs. |
Hello Ryorry, I'm saying this respectfully and not to score points...
Just as Glasgow has educated many of us about tropes and symbolism deliberately used to malign Jewish people, so there are certain tropes which have been used to malign members of the LGBTQ+ community.
Inferring a parallel between sexual orientation or gender reassignment and paedophilia is one of those tropes.
Your link is all about the complexities of obliging people to reveal sensitive personal and confidential medical information in job applications if they are members of the Trans+ community. You have linked it in a discussion about DBS checking on a convicted paedophile.
It would be good if you could state that that wasn't your intention and remove the link. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| And to top it off on 11:37 - Dec 7 with 2052 views | Ryorry |
| And to top it off on 11:15 - Dec 7 by ArnoldMoorhen |
Hello Ryorry, I'm saying this respectfully and not to score points...
Just as Glasgow has educated many of us about tropes and symbolism deliberately used to malign Jewish people, so there are certain tropes which have been used to malign members of the LGBTQ+ community.
Inferring a parallel between sexual orientation or gender reassignment and paedophilia is one of those tropes.
Your link is all about the complexities of obliging people to reveal sensitive personal and confidential medical information in job applications if they are members of the Trans+ community. You have linked it in a discussion about DBS checking on a convicted paedophile.
It would be good if you could state that that wasn't your intention and remove the link. |
"Inferring a parallel between sexual orientation or gender reassignment and paedophilia is one of those tropes."
I'm sorry if you read it that way. Of course it bloody well wasn't my intention, that's why I didn't post the tweet it had been attached to - it wasn't relavent to the thread.
BL posted a link which "(DBS) helps employers make safer recruitment decisions each year by processing and issuing DBS checks." The thread is about a man who having been checked by their staff still slipped through the net.
I posted a related link from the Law Society I thought he might be interested in, relating to a different act which they reported "could criminalise innocent staff". That it refers to the Gender Recognition Act is purely coincidental, it could have referred to anything else under the sun - the specific topic of the act was not my point - the pressure HR staff are put under, and their fallibility when carrying out the checks, was and is. I'm amazed that some people can't actually see that. | |
| |
| And to top it off on 11:40 - Dec 7 with 2050 views | textbackup |
| And to top it off on 11:02 - Dec 7 by itfcjoe |
What do you do with someone like this, every day out of prison is another opportunity to ruin someone elses life |
see above for my simple suggestion.
makes my fcking bloody boil that i could have walked by this nonce at the game with my two daughters. | |
| |
| And to top it off on 11:45 - Dec 7 with 2023 views | DJR |
| And to top it off on 11:37 - Dec 7 by Ryorry |
"Inferring a parallel between sexual orientation or gender reassignment and paedophilia is one of those tropes."
I'm sorry if you read it that way. Of course it bloody well wasn't my intention, that's why I didn't post the tweet it had been attached to - it wasn't relavent to the thread.
BL posted a link which "(DBS) helps employers make safer recruitment decisions each year by processing and issuing DBS checks." The thread is about a man who having been checked by their staff still slipped through the net.
I posted a related link from the Law Society I thought he might be interested in, relating to a different act which they reported "could criminalise innocent staff". That it refers to the Gender Recognition Act is purely coincidental, it could have referred to anything else under the sun - the specific topic of the act was not my point - the pressure HR staff are put under, and their fallibility when carrying out the checks, was and is. I'm amazed that some people can't actually see that. |
I didn't have a problem with what you posted, and certainly didn't interpret in the way some others have done. |  | | |
| Cut his nuts off? (n/t) on 11:47 - Dec 7 with 2010 views | Bloots |
| And to top it off on 11:02 - Dec 7 by itfcjoe |
What do you do with someone like this, every day out of prison is another opportunity to ruin someone elses life |
|  |
| "The sooner he comes back the better, this place has been a disaster without him" - TWTD User (July 2025) |
| |
| And to top it off on 12:40 - Dec 7 with 1900 views | ArnoldMoorhen |
| And to top it off on 11:37 - Dec 7 by Ryorry |
"Inferring a parallel between sexual orientation or gender reassignment and paedophilia is one of those tropes."
I'm sorry if you read it that way. Of course it bloody well wasn't my intention, that's why I didn't post the tweet it had been attached to - it wasn't relavent to the thread.
BL posted a link which "(DBS) helps employers make safer recruitment decisions each year by processing and issuing DBS checks." The thread is about a man who having been checked by their staff still slipped through the net.
I posted a related link from the Law Society I thought he might be interested in, relating to a different act which they reported "could criminalise innocent staff". That it refers to the Gender Recognition Act is purely coincidental, it could have referred to anything else under the sun - the specific topic of the act was not my point - the pressure HR staff are put under, and their fallibility when carrying out the checks, was and is. I'm amazed that some people can't actually see that. |
Totally up to you. In the interests of board harmony I was simply trying to demonstrate how the link you gave could be interpreted. | | | |
| And to top it off on 16:04 - Dec 23 with 1381 views | NeedhamChris |
| And to top it off on 14:29 - Dec 3 by NeedhamChris |
And to clarify - asking you to justify how you've leapt from criminal convictions of sex offenders to trans people and gender recognition as a 'related' article isn't looking for a fight. Seems a reasonable question. [Post edited 3 Dec 2022 14:29]
|
Didn't really get an answer to this at the time...but makes a little more sense after today.
Anyway...did anyone hear anything about Phoenix after this? Someone ITK at that side told me they had a few negative reviews online but that they'd manage to successfully get them removed as fake reviews. Is a bit of a concern that all of the other family functions they have will go on regardless - unless they seriously improve/rectify these issue. | |
| |
| And to top it off on 16:10 - Dec 23 with 1372 views | Zx1988 |
| And to top it off on 16:04 - Dec 23 by NeedhamChris |
Didn't really get an answer to this at the time...but makes a little more sense after today.
Anyway...did anyone hear anything about Phoenix after this? Someone ITK at that side told me they had a few negative reviews online but that they'd manage to successfully get them removed as fake reviews. Is a bit of a concern that all of the other family functions they have will go on regardless - unless they seriously improve/rectify these issue. |
It's pretty shocking - if entirely unsurprising - that they have managed to deflect negative comments in this way. I suppose those who have such concerns could always report them to the relevant regulatory/certificating bodies... | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
