Forum | So, we're all agreed that McKenna's agent is a prick then? by Dubtractor

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

So, we're all agreed that McKenna's agent is a prick then? 16:32 - May 22 with 3903 views

No text required.

	I was born underwater, I dried out in the sun. I started humping volcanoes baby, when I was too young.
Poll:	Important Christmas poll - which is the best Celebration chocolate?

So, we're all agreed that McKenna's agent is a prick then? on 17:55 - May 22 with 293 views

HighgateBlue

So, we're all agreed that McKenna's agent is a prick then? on 17:21 - May 22 by tractorboy1978
I might be wrong but I would imagine it is harder to sack an agent than you may think. Contract signed by both parties that I would imagine an agent would have to be in breach of.

The very definition of an agency relationship is that the agent acts for and on behalf of his principal. If an agent does something, it is as if the principal has done it.

So he speaks for Kieran. He is not permitted to say something which he does not have Kieran's authority to say. If he says X on behalf of Kieran, and Kieran says that Y is true and X is false, Kieran is plainly entitled to require the agent to correct that.

Saying something contrary to one's authority and/or refusing to correct it has got to be a breach of an agency agreement.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread