Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Forest's £750k fine 14:22 - Oct 11 with 1361 viewssjg

If what Forest said about Attwell being a Luton fan amounts to an "attack on the integrity of a match official on an unparalleled scale" - why are referees not allowed to officiate their own team? And I seem to remember in the L1 promotion season we got an official changed due to them being a Wednesday fan?
0
Forest's £750k fine on 14:36 - Oct 11 with 1280 viewsZx1988

It's to avoid even the perception of a conflict of interest.

I work in a professional role, with my firm both selling and surveying properties. I cannot survey any property being sold by my firm, even though I would produce an honest report, for precisely the same reason.

You ain't a beauty but, hey, you're alright.
Poll: Stone Island - immediate associations

1
Forest's £750k fine on 14:57 - Oct 11 with 1197 viewsglasso

To be fair, a league saying refs can't referee the team they support is perfectly reasonable.

And saying a ref made three bad decisions on purpose in a game because he wanted the team to lose in order to help another team.... is attacking his integrity.

You have to have SOME faith that a ref has enough integrity not to calculate decisions to help other teams, and you can do that while still saying 'it's probably much better for the optics if we don't ref the teams we support.'
4
Forest's £750k fine on 15:07 - Oct 11 with 1165 viewssjg

Forest's £750k fine on 14:36 - Oct 11 by Zx1988

It's to avoid even the perception of a conflict of interest.

I work in a professional role, with my firm both selling and surveying properties. I cannot survey any property being sold by my firm, even though I would produce an honest report, for precisely the same reason.


So why can't Forest raise the fact that there is a conflict of interest when the VAR makes incorrect decisions?
0
Forest's £750k fine on 15:53 - Oct 11 with 1040 viewsBasuco

Forest's £750k fine on 14:57 - Oct 11 by glasso

To be fair, a league saying refs can't referee the team they support is perfectly reasonable.

And saying a ref made three bad decisions on purpose in a game because he wanted the team to lose in order to help another team.... is attacking his integrity.

You have to have SOME faith that a ref has enough integrity not to calculate decisions to help other teams, and you can do that while still saying 'it's probably much better for the optics if we don't ref the teams we support.'


Agree with that, but I feel the FA should consider the question of should a referee officiate a game that includes the main rivals of the team he supports, because it is broadly the same thing.
0
Forest's £750k fine on 16:26 - Oct 11 with 957 viewsMattinLondon

Forest's £750k fine on 15:53 - Oct 11 by Basuco

Agree with that, but I feel the FA should consider the question of should a referee officiate a game that includes the main rivals of the team he supports, because it is broadly the same thing.


This is the main problem with encouraging ex-professionals becoming officials - subconsciously or not, the potential for bias must be high.
0




About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2025