| More bad press for Muric on 18:14 - Apr 1 with 1578 views | C_HealyIsAPleasure |
Half as many points for driving performances as he’s helped us win this season. Impressive effort |  |
|  |
| More bad press for Muric on 18:18 - Apr 1 with 1567 views | Radlett_blue |
| More bad press for Muric on 16:45 - Apr 1 by portmanking |
Well, I heard about it on the evening of the Chelsea home game. So, I'm sure plenty around town already know.
Given the ownership's dim view of James Norwood's antics, I also wonder whether Muric's 'injuries' are a smokescreen to preserve what market value he has before flogging in the summer. |
whatever did happen to Norwood's apparently preposterous "appeal"? |  |
| |
| More bad press for Muric on 18:22 - Apr 1 with 1544 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| More bad press for Muric on 18:18 - Apr 1 by Radlett_blue |
whatever did happen to Norwood's apparently preposterous "appeal"? |
It failed. |  |
| |
| They are even good at covering up disappearing players.... on 18:33 - Apr 1 with 1517 views | Zx1988 |
| They are even good at covering up disappearing players.... on 18:12 - Apr 1 by Dubtractor |
Something clearly has gone on there, even if just as simple as all parties agreeing that the loan wasn't working. |
For whatever reason, the club seems to have developed an aversion to letting it be public knowledge that mistakes have been made, or things aren't 100% rosy.
With hindsight, even the announcement that Murić had been signed with the help of Goalkeeper.com feels a bit like Ashton throwing them under the bus.
It all feels a bit silly and control-freakish. It's football; players turn out to be knobs, and signings don't work out. Ashton and Co don't have to maintain these really transparent charades that everything is fine, even when the evidence proves otherwise. |  |
| |
| More bad press for Muric on 18:57 - Apr 1 with 1470 views | textbackup |
| More bad press for Muric on 17:45 - Apr 1 by Zx1988 |
I suppose it might be tricky, as no players require to drive for their job, but there's an element of me that wonders whether (given the reputational risk) it would be worth the club ensuring players are suitably insured. |
They are required to get to training, so just like most of us, need to drive to get there. |  |
| |
| More bad press for Muric on 18:59 - Apr 1 with 1465 views | TresBonne |
Utter, utter clown.
How can he drive with no insurance, with the money he makes ffs... |  | | |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:05 - Apr 1 with 1446 views | Trequartista |
| More bad press for Muric on 17:16 - Apr 1 by portmanking |
I'm *so* glad I'm not the only one who sees Frimley parallels. |
Not sure if Frimley would be makin alternative accounts. |  |
| |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:08 - Apr 1 with 1445 views | Trequartista |
Not a big point, just an aside, but I find it curious how some people's on-field opinions of a player change when they have an off-field misdemeanor. Possibly subconsciously. See also James Norwood. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| More bad press for Muric on 19:13 - Apr 1 with 1431 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| More bad press for Muric on 17:53 - Apr 1 by Swansea_Blue |
What an arse. Another one without insurance (after Brandon). What’s wrong with these idiots? Driving around in high marque cars but can’t be arsed to sort out insurance. Are they just used to having everything done for them, think they’re above the rest of us, or what? |
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the driving without insurance because the other offences invalidate the insurance so hence they are then uninsured? |  |
| |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:15 - Apr 1 with 1413 views | Illinoisblue |
| More bad press for Muric on 17:16 - Apr 1 by portmanking |
I'm *so* glad I'm not the only one who sees Frimley parallels. |
More nerdy/knowall than frimmers, surely |  |
| |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:16 - Apr 1 with 1405 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| More bad press for Muric on 18:57 - Apr 1 by textbackup |
They are required to get to training, so just like most of us, need to drive to get there. |
Just like us, alternative methods of travel exist. I think that if a professional footballer argued they couldn't lose their licence because they need it for their work, they would stil lose it and be told to make alternative arrangements for how to get there. | |
| |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:18 - Apr 1 with 1393 views | textbackup |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:16 - Apr 1 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Just like us, alternative methods of travel exist. I think that if a professional footballer argued they couldn't lose their licence because they need it for their work, they would stil lose it and be told to make alternative arrangements for how to get there. |
Yep, just like us law abiding citizens who pay for insurance whilst not earning £10k plus a week.
It’s idiotic and undefendable that someone of his position doesn’t have car insurance. Doubt I’m alone in that | |
| |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:24 - Apr 1 with 1366 views | football |
| More bad press for Muric on 16:36 - Apr 1 by textbackup |
Would any normal persons address be protected? |
Yes, GDPR would protect | | | |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:26 - Apr 1 with 1347 views | textbackup |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:24 - Apr 1 by football |
Yes, GDPR would protect |
So what you’re saying is the paper shouldn’t have printed my address back in 2004/05?! | |
| |
| They are even good at covering up disappearing players.... on 19:26 - Apr 1 with 1348 views | football |
| They are even good at covering up disappearing players.... on 18:09 - Apr 1 by Marshalls_Mullet |
...has anyone seen Ben Godfrey?! |
Thought it was common knowledge he'd gone back | | | |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:30 - Apr 1 with 1329 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:26 - Apr 1 by textbackup |
So what you’re saying is the paper shouldn’t have printed my address back in 2004/05?! |
As a law-abiding citizen I presume not! | |
| |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:43 - Apr 1 with 1271 views | textbackup |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:30 - Apr 1 by Nthsuffolkblue |
As a law-abiding citizen I presume not! |
Yep that wa.nker sign at Norwich away would really define a criminal 😂
But it is TWTD so… | |
| |
| More bad press for Muric on 20:00 - Apr 1 with 1216 views | NeedhamChris |
This makes a pleasant change, it's usually him giving points away.
Maybe footballers as role models isn't the best idea after all. | |
| |
| More bad press for Muric on 21:19 - Apr 1 with 1088 views | stonojnr |
| More bad press for Muric on 18:57 - Apr 1 by textbackup |
They are required to get to training, so just like most of us, need to drive to get there. |
could hop on a bike, lift share, catch a bus, Jason Dozzell got one of his family to drive for him around iirc when he got banned driving. | | | |
| More bad press for Muric on 21:29 - Apr 1 with 1052 views | stonojnr |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:13 - Apr 1 by Nthsuffolkblue |
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the driving without insurance because the other offences invalidate the insurance so hence they are then uninsured? |
no using a mobile phone whilst driving is only 6points and £200 fine if done on a fixed penalty, upto 1k if it goes to court.
be nice if it did invalidate the insurance and you could get an unlimited fine instead, maybe some of the other idiots who drive around town on their phones would pause to think and stop doing it. | | | |
| More bad press for Muric on 22:00 - Apr 1 with 993 views | NedPlimpton |
| More bad press for Muric on 17:16 - Apr 1 by portmanking |
I'm *so* glad I'm not the only one who sees Frimley parallels. |
Hang on....
You were literally just questioning his injury too!!! |  | | |
| More bad press for Muric on 22:09 - Apr 1 with 969 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| More bad press for Muric on 21:29 - Apr 1 by stonojnr |
no using a mobile phone whilst driving is only 6points and £200 fine if done on a fixed penalty, upto 1k if it goes to court.
be nice if it did invalidate the insurance and you could get an unlimited fine instead, maybe some of the other idiots who drive around town on their phones would pause to think and stop doing it. |
Yes, in Muric's case they seem like separate offences but I have a feeling that in other cases they might not be. Not sure about Williams' situation but I believe driving under the influence would be one. | |
| |
| More bad press for Muric on 09:58 - Apr 2 with 678 views | BlueBadger |
| More bad press for Muric on 17:04 - Apr 1 by Cheltenham_Blue |
You went, in just 12 minutes to 'hopefully he's off' to 'Rumour is he's off'
I prefer Frimmers as a poster, if we're being honest. |
At least Frimmers was occasionally funny. Phil, now this one has gone, can we have Frimmers back? |  |
| |
| They are even good at covering up disappearing players.... on 10:11 - Apr 2 with 644 views | portmanking |
| They are even good at covering up disappearing players.... on 18:12 - Apr 1 by Dubtractor |
Something clearly has gone on there, even if just as simple as all parties agreeing that the loan wasn't working. |
We won't be seeing him in a Town shirt anymore. 100%.
The guy needs quite serious off-field help. | | | |
| More bad press for Muric on 10:18 - Apr 2 with 593 views | Steve_M |
| More bad press for Muric on 19:15 - Apr 1 by Illinoisblue |
More nerdy/knowall than frimmers, surely |
Nah, Nerdy was always intelligent albeit with an incredible degree of spin.
It's a recurring poster who always goes the same way, posts excessively looking for up arrows then when that doesn't work just ties for attention. Will soon storm off in a huff until the next iteration. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
