| Even the Blairite Ultras on 17:21 - Jul 14 with 446 views | Ryorry |
| Even the Blairite Ultras on 13:40 - Jul 14 by Tangledupin_Blue |
I agree and have thought so for years. They are sleek and graceful; almost elegant. And functional.
I also remember when the first few had been erected. There were 'anti' politicians, on tv and radio, who'd obviously never stood near a working turbine, complaining about the noise they made. A gentle swish is all I've heard whilst standing under them. |
Another wind turbine lover here.
I remember posting a few years ago that some people who love the old Dutch style ones need to think back a few hundred years to when Hans was probably saying to Maria "oooh these new fangled wind mill things are such a blot on the landscape".
https://ancientengrtech.wisc.edu/the-netherlands-windmill/#:~:text=Types%20of%20 |  |
|  |
| Even the Blairite Ultras on 20:13 - Jul 14 with 369 views | mellowblue |
| Even the Blairite Ultras on 17:21 - Jul 14 by Mercian |
Survey:
1: Do you wan't to see more clean electricity genereated?
2: Do you object to the building of wind-farms to help reach that goal?
3: Do you object to them being built in the large field at the front of your house?
"Not in my back yard" [Post edited 14 Jul 17:22]
|
I don't want them built in areas of oustanding natural beauty really, bearing in mind they are visible for miles around, particularly the new generation mega ones. And they are talking about 41 of them. |  | | |
| Even the Blairite Ultras on 22:41 - Jul 14 with 328 views | reusersfreekicks |
| Even the Blairite Ultras on 11:21 - Jul 14 by OldFart71 |
Labour doesn't care what they destroy. The net zero policy is ill thought out costing everyone money through higher energy bills therefore requiring higher wages and adding to inflation and putting jobs at risk whilst making little impact on the environment.
You have Khan in London shutting roads supposedly to cut pollution meaning that traffic has to travel further to get to the same place.
Basic common sense isn't evident in any of Labour's policies.
Reeves states she wants more people in work, so put's up N.I. that has the reverse effect.
Milliband wants to cover East Anglia in solar farms and pylons to cut pollution, but allows places like Ipswich to be clogged up due to no other way of getting traffic to the biggest port in Europe, who have already lost trade due to the Orwell bridge being shut more than open. |
Would you prefer more children died in London due to the effects of pollution?
One of the most ridiculous posts I've seen on here for a while and that is really saying something |  | | |
| Even the Blairite Ultras on 23:23 - Jul 14 with 308 views | benrhyddingblue |
| Even the Blairite Ultras on 20:13 - Jul 14 by mellowblue |
I don't want them built in areas of oustanding natural beauty really, bearing in mind they are visible for miles around, particularly the new generation mega ones. And they are talking about 41 of them. |
Could you elaborate on “new generation mega ones” and what you mean? What size are you talking about? What efficiency output etc etc? You seem an ‘expert’ so I am curious to know more off your knowledge? | | | |
| Even the Blairite Ultras on 00:32 - Jul 15 with 257 views | Tangledupin_Blue |
| Even the Blairite Ultras on 11:21 - Jul 14 by OldFart71 |
Labour doesn't care what they destroy. The net zero policy is ill thought out costing everyone money through higher energy bills therefore requiring higher wages and adding to inflation and putting jobs at risk whilst making little impact on the environment.
You have Khan in London shutting roads supposedly to cut pollution meaning that traffic has to travel further to get to the same place.
Basic common sense isn't evident in any of Labour's policies.
Reeves states she wants more people in work, so put's up N.I. that has the reverse effect.
Milliband wants to cover East Anglia in solar farms and pylons to cut pollution, but allows places like Ipswich to be clogged up due to no other way of getting traffic to the biggest port in Europe, who have already lost trade due to the Orwell bridge being shut more than open. |
"Biggest port in Europe".
"Orwell Bridge shut more than open".
Just make stuff up to be angry about. |  |
| |
| Even the Blairite Ultras on 08:14 - Jul 15 with 151 views | StokieBlue |
| Even the Blairite Ultras on 11:21 - Jul 14 by OldFart71 |
Labour doesn't care what they destroy. The net zero policy is ill thought out costing everyone money through higher energy bills therefore requiring higher wages and adding to inflation and putting jobs at risk whilst making little impact on the environment.
You have Khan in London shutting roads supposedly to cut pollution meaning that traffic has to travel further to get to the same place.
Basic common sense isn't evident in any of Labour's policies.
Reeves states she wants more people in work, so put's up N.I. that has the reverse effect.
Milliband wants to cover East Anglia in solar farms and pylons to cut pollution, but allows places like Ipswich to be clogged up due to no other way of getting traffic to the biggest port in Europe, who have already lost trade due to the Orwell bridge being shut more than open. |
Pretty impressive to get almost everything wrong, even facts you could look up.
Unfortunately uninformed opinions like this are likely to be key in the next election.
SB |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
