| Humphreys not used again! 13:31 - Nov 29 with 442 views | Pilgrimblue |
Why not? Surely he’d offer something different as current midfield isn’t creating much. Could be part of plan B plus give U21s a chance. There must be someone capable of stepping up otherwise what’s the point!! |  | | |  |
| Humphreys not used again! on 13:33 - Nov 29 with 439 views | TresBonne |
Was just about to post a thread on this as well. He must think what the fck am I actually doing here? We need a goal, the midfield isn't creating a great deal, I had a great season of goalscoring and creating last year and I can't get on the pitch when we are chasing a game. |  | | |
| Humphreys not used again! on 13:40 - Nov 29 with 405 views | Bellevue_Blue |
Keeping him was always a sign our transfer business hadn't quite gone to plan.
It's clear the KM does not believe he is ready to positively impact the team and so he's only been kept around to fill a gap in the case of injuries. |  | | |
| Humphreys not used again! on 13:42 - Nov 29 with 389 views | bournemouthblue |
I suspect he gets a loan or transfer in January, which maybe the case for 2 or 3 others as well |  |
| |
| Humphreys not used again! on 15:51 - Nov 29 with 225 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
Agreed, give him a start or sell him in Jan. He's 22 now, not a youngster.
I'd love to see him given a go.
Our youth pathway is rubbish. |  |
| |
| Humphreys not used again! on 15:53 - Nov 29 with 209 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Humphreys not used again! on 13:40 - Nov 29 by Bellevue_Blue |
Keeping him was always a sign our transfer business hadn't quite gone to plan.
It's clear the KM does not believe he is ready to positively impact the team and so he's only been kept around to fill a gap in the case of injuries. |
Hes 22, if he's not ready now in KMs eyes, he never will be. | |
| |
| Humphreys not used again! on 16:06 - Nov 29 with 161 views | Smoresy |
Would love any player to do well for us, Humphreys very much included, but his lack of inclusion must mean he's below the level of his peers in training. He isn't a youngster needing protection after all, while every sign is that McKenna likes him on a personal level. | | | |
| Humphreys not used again! on 16:12 - Nov 29 with 139 views | Pilgrimblue |
| Humphreys not used again! on 15:51 - Nov 29 by Marshalls_Mullet |
Agreed, give him a start or sell him in Jan. He's 22 now, not a youngster.
I'd love to see him given a go.
Our youth pathway is rubbish. |
Yes you and me. McK clearly doesn’t believe in youth as don’t think he’s given anyone a chance.
Either our recruitment is pants or coaching is!
As you’ve said Humph isn’t young so must be worth a chance or release him he deserves a go at a team that might appreciate his talents. | | | |
| Humphreys not used again! on 16:14 - Nov 29 with 130 views | Joey_Joe_Joe_Junior |
Fanbase calling for Humphreys and Burns. We are still starting Taylor and Hirst, yet at the forum Mark Ashton is god and we have spent hundreds of millions in two summers. There for sure is a disconnect somewhere! |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Humphreys not used again! on 16:39 - Nov 29 with 45 views | southnorfolkblue |
| Humphreys not used again! on 16:12 - Nov 29 by Pilgrimblue |
Yes you and me. McK clearly doesn’t believe in youth as don’t think he’s given anyone a chance.
Either our recruitment is pants or coaching is!
As you’ve said Humph isn’t young so must be worth a chance or release him he deserves a go at a team that might appreciate his talents. |
Egeli is 19, so I’m not sure why you think KM is averse to giving youth a chance.
The issue is that on the whole our an academy has been rubbish for years. This is being addressed but it will take some time to bleed through into players being ready to play for the first team | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
