By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
It's even better given that it's come from the fun vacuum that is Reeves. A bit like seeing an insightful, positive and informative Dark Horse comment.
I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
Trump loses it again on 15:32 - Jul 8 by BlueBadger
Speaking of stupid things done by corrupt far right leaders, this is a monster of a zinger.
Can anyone better-versed in these matters than me shed any light on why she accepted it, given that if she hadn't, the standards enquiry would presumably have kept rolling? Presumably it's somewhat ceremonial and he could have forced the issue?
Can anyone better-versed in these matters than me shed any light on why she accepted it, given that if she hadn't, the standards enquiry would presumably have kept rolling? Presumably it's somewhat ceremonial and he could have forced the issue?
It would have led to a Reform outcry about about democracy being blocked by the establishment. Much better to let him embarrass himself against Count Binface, then the investigation can restart if Farage is re-elected.
2
Trump loses it again on 20:21 - Jul 8 with 938 views
Can anyone better-versed in these matters than me shed any light on why she accepted it, given that if she hadn't, the standards enquiry would presumably have kept rolling? Presumably it's somewhat ceremonial and he could have forced the issue?
What I don't understand is why the rules allow anyone who has resigned in such circumstances is allowed to contest the seat they have just resigned from.
It would have led to a Reform outcry about about democracy being blocked by the establishment. Much better to let him embarrass himself against Count Binface, then the investigation can restart if Farage is re-elected.
Can anyone better-versed in these matters than me shed any light on why she accepted it, given that if she hadn't, the standards enquiry would presumably have kept rolling? Presumably it's somewhat ceremonial and he could have forced the issue?
Because six weeks of him having to argue with a bloke with a bin on his head and then returning to parliament to face an enquiry is a) likely to be more damaging and b) peak bantz
I'm one of the people who was blamed for getting Paul Cook sacked. PM for the full post.
What I don't understand is why the rules allow anyone who has resigned in such circumstances is allowed to contest the seat they have just resigned from.
Presumably he'd have to resign as Steward and Bailiff of the Manor of Northstead before he can stand in the by-election. Could that be refused by the monarch ("Off to the Tower with him!")? Or maybe the denizens of Northstead could sue for dereliction of duty (for, say, £5m)?
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
