| Great team 18:54 - Nov 28 with 2987 views | Swailsey |
Very happy with this! |  |
| Who said: "Colin Healy made Cesc Fabregas look like Colin Healy"? | We miss you TLA |
| |  |
| Great team on 18:56 - Nov 28 with 2949 views | Radlett_blue |
Looks defensive to me.
4-5-1 where Waghorn might get isolated & holding the ball up is not his strength.
Need to keep it on the ground - can we do that? |  |
| |
| Great team on 18:56 - Nov 28 with 2944 views | StokieBlue |
Can you explain why?
SB |  |
| Avatar - IC410 - Tadpoles Nebula |
| |
| on 19:03 - Nov 28 with 2889 views | _ |
| Great team on 18:56 - Nov 28 by StokieBlue |
Can you explain why?
SB |
|  | | |
| Great team on 19:03 - Nov 28 with 2877 views | catch74 |
| Great team on 18:56 - Nov 28 by StokieBlue |
Can you explain why?
SB |
I’d say best back four we can put out currently, for me Connely and Skuse worked well v Sheff Weds, great to see Huws back in and seemed like he made a difference last year in similar line ups. I’d also think most people would prefer both Ward and Celina over Sears starting. Waghorn is the only choice up front if Garner is absent. Shame Folami isn’t on the bench. |  |
| |
| Great team on 19:04 - Nov 28 with 2865 views | gtsb1966 |
With that side we will lose by three in my opinion. |  | | |
| Great team on 19:05 - Nov 28 with 2850 views | Northern_Blue81 |
Is a confusing formation.
We would of been best play a 4-0-6 and giving them a game. |  | | |
| Great team on 19:06 - Nov 28 with 2849 views | BackToRussia |
Might be balanced but it looks weak to me. No McGoldrick or Garner and suddenly we look very unthreatening. Remains to be seen what kind of performance Waghorn can turn in on his own up front. |  |
| |
| Great team on 19:12 - Nov 28 with 2786 views | Steve_M |
| Great team on 19:06 - Nov 28 by BackToRussia |
Might be balanced but it looks weak to me. No McGoldrick or Garner and suddenly we look very unthreatening. Remains to be seen what kind of performance Waghorn can turn in on his own up front. |
With Garner there instead of Waghorn I think it would have been decent. A lot will depend where the three behind end up playing as I don't think Waghorn will be effective on his own.
We just need to not feck up early again and go from there.... |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Great team on 19:13 - Nov 28 with 2775 views | BackToRussia |
| Great team on 19:12 - Nov 28 by Steve_M |
With Garner there instead of Waghorn I think it would have been decent. A lot will depend where the three behind end up playing as I don't think Waghorn will be effective on his own.
We just need to not feck up early again and go from there.... |
Celina, Ward and Waghorn have barely been on the pitch at the same time and a lot relies on them hooking up. [Post edited 28 Nov 2017 19:13]
| |
| |
| Great team on 19:21 - Nov 28 with 2737 views | Ftnfwest |
Team with a chance for sure. Unlikely to see Celina Saturday unless he scores a hat trick or something |  | | |
| Great team on 19:24 - Nov 28 with 2725 views | Swailsey |
I should have said “very happy, given the injuries” | |
| Who said: "Colin Healy made Cesc Fabregas look like Colin Healy"? | We miss you TLA |
| |
| Great team on 19:31 - Nov 28 with 2690 views | Herbivore |
| Great team on 19:24 - Nov 28 by Swailsey |
I should have said “very happy, given the injuries” |
I'd agree with that. Ideally we'd want Garner playing but he's injured so nothing to be done about that. In Huws, Ward, Celina and Waghorn we've got players who are capable of a right quick transition from defence to attack so we should be a threat on the break. My only worry is us having enough outlets when we're under the kosh, Garner and Didz give us that. |  |
| |
| on 20:34 - Nov 28 with 2572 views | _ |
| Great team on 19:05 - Nov 28 by Northern_Blue81 |
Is a confusing formation.
We would of been best play a 4-0-6 and giving them a game. |
| | | |
| Great team on 20:39 - Nov 28 with 2543 views | Herbivore |
Indeed. I'm pleased Mick seems to have settled on this formation now, although it has left us exposed in the full back areas at times I think the more we stick to it the better we'll become. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
