| FFP 13:43 - Feb 11 with 1497 views | FrimleyBlue |
Does it exist in league 1?
|  |
| |  |
| FFP on 13:43 - Feb 11 with 1497 views | TractorCam |
Doesn't exist in the championship does it? |  |
| |
| FFP on 13:46 - Feb 11 with 1471 views | WeirdFishes |
Yes, think it’s more or less the same principles regarding losses over a three year period.
There’s also a rule that wages cannot be more than 60% of a clubs turnover, although owners investements count as turnover in this instance. |  |
| |
| FFP on 13:52 - Feb 11 with 1439 views | Guthrum |
| FFP on 13:43 - Feb 11 by TractorCam |
Doesn't exist in the championship does it? |
Yes. It's now a certain loss over a rolling three-year period. Plus the penalties have been tightened up and are being enforced (mainly transfer bans or restrictions, tho points deductions can also be made). |  |
| |
| FFP on 16:35 - Feb 11 with 1350 views | britbiker |
| FFP on 13:52 - Feb 11 by Guthrum |
Yes. It's now a certain loss over a rolling three-year period. Plus the penalties have been tightened up and are being enforced (mainly transfer bans or restrictions, tho points deductions can also be made). |
I thought there was also some clause regarding recently signed players whereby some of the wages didnt count otherwise every team relegated would be penalised as they are not always able to shift a player on high wages . |  | | |
| FFP on 18:01 - Feb 11 with 1264 views | Pinewoodblue |
| FFP on 13:52 - Feb 11 by Guthrum |
Yes. It's now a certain loss over a rolling three-year period. Plus the penalties have been tightened up and are being enforced (mainly transfer bans or restrictions, tho points deductions can also be made). |
Since we are allowed to lose £13m a year in Championship, and after allowable expenditure, we are currently losing less than half the allowable amount. We can keep within FFP for a. Couple of years before we are in danger of a breach. |  |
| |
| FFP on 19:14 - Feb 11 with 1177 views | Guthrum |
| FFP on 16:35 - Feb 11 by britbiker |
I thought there was also some clause regarding recently signed players whereby some of the wages didnt count otherwise every team relegated would be penalised as they are not always able to shift a player on high wages . |
For teams relegated to L1, I'm pretty sure there is some leeway initially. | |
| |
| FFP on 19:18 - Feb 11 with 1167 views | bournemouthblue |
| FFP on 13:46 - Feb 11 by WeirdFishes |
Yes, think it’s more or less the same principles regarding losses over a three year period.
There’s also a rule that wages cannot be more than 60% of a clubs turnover, although owners investements count as turnover in this instance. |
It's 75% for sides relegated from the Championship for a season or two which would put us at an advantage
Presumably our turnover would be one of the highest in that league also?
The club really have to get season ticket prices this summer, we desperately need respectable crowds if we are to have any real advantage compared to the rest |  |
| |
| FFP on 19:18 - Feb 11 with 1163 views | Guthrum |
| FFP on 18:01 - Feb 11 by Pinewoodblue |
Since we are allowed to lose £13m a year in Championship, and after allowable expenditure, we are currently losing less than half the allowable amount. We can keep within FFP for a. Couple of years before we are in danger of a breach. |
It's £39m over three years, on a rolling basis. So if, say, we lost £5m and £4m, then the following season we could theoretically run up losses of £30m without falling foul. Would have to be very careful for the two years after that, tho, as that figure would still be part of the calculation. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| FFP on 19:20 - Feb 11 with 1153 views | braveblue |
Marcus will introduce it if not. It’s his main excuse for everything. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
