Forum | Peterborough mustâ€™ve had a clause for Marriott to score in the final...? by SitfcB

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Peterborough mustâ€™ve had a clause for Marriott to score in the final...? 17:01 - May 27 with 1072 views

Waghorns sock cost us Â£75 grand. Couldnâ€™t write this shit sometimes ðŸ˜‚. Gutted for Derby owner as he wedged out Â£10 million on Waghorn & Marriott. Imagine if they had started or even come on at HT not with 20 odd mins to go. Well done Dean Smith/Villa - top class manager ðŸ‘ðŸ»
— Darragh MacAnthony (@DMAC102) May 27, 2019

	COYB
Poll:	What will today’s 10 pager be
Blog:	[Blog] One Year On

Peterborough must’ve had a clause for Marriott to score in the final...? on 17:02 - May 27 with 1039 views

pointofblue

Maybe £75,000 per goal for the first ten or twenty scored for Derby by him?

Hopefully we'll have something similar in place for Waghorn.

Poll:

Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

Peterborough must’ve had a clause for Marriott to score in the final...? on 17:27 - May 27 with 875 views

WarkTheWarkITFC

I doubt it was a clause about scoring in a playoff final.

More likely 15 goals or whatever he would have been on if that was his goal.

Poll:	How many points from 18 would Lambert need to have to actually be sacked?
Blog:	Ipswich Town and the Rotten Kitchen Cupboards

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread