Should everyone's DNA be taken 21:51 - Jun 21 with 6805 views | gtsb | Just watching Britain's most evil serial killers on TV and it was the Ipswich Steve Wright case and it was DNA that caught him. Surely the time has come when everyone's DNA should be recorded. Think of how many murders, sex offences, this would prove. I don't get the objections against it. [Post edited 21 Jun 2019 21:52]
| | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 21:53 - Jun 21 with 3754 views | BlueBadger | 'The innocent have nothing to fear', eh? The innocent have plenty to fear, starting with the sort of people who say things like 'the innocent have nothing to fear'. [Post edited 21 Jun 2019 21:55]
| |
| |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 21:55 - Jun 21 with 3740 views | J2BLUE | Why stop there? DNA, fingerprints, microchips for all, ban cash, a tv in homes that you can't turn off that can see you 24/7. | |
| |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 21:57 - Jun 21 with 3726 views | factual_blue | The police have never, ever fitted anybody up, have they? | |
| |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 21:58 - Jun 21 with 3732 views | gtsb |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 21:53 - Jun 21 by BlueBadger | 'The innocent have nothing to fear', eh? The innocent have plenty to fear, starting with the sort of people who say things like 'the innocent have nothing to fear'. [Post edited 21 Jun 2019 21:55]
|
Steve Wright was convicted through DNA. How many more would he have murdered. How soon could've Levi Bellfield been caught before he destroyed so many womens lives. | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:01 - Jun 21 with 3722 views | gtsb |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 21:57 - Jun 21 by factual_blue | The police have never, ever fitted anybody up, have they? |
This isn't Dixon of Dock Green | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:03 - Jun 21 with 3717 views | BloomBlue |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 21:58 - Jun 21 by gtsb | Steve Wright was convicted through DNA. How many more would he have murdered. How soon could've Levi Bellfield been caught before he destroyed so many womens lives. |
Dont be silly it's totally acceptable for a few innocent people to be killed so long as everybody's liberty is protected. No you are totally correct with your Bellfield example. | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:06 - Jun 21 with 3713 views | factual_blue |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:01 - Jun 21 by gtsb | This isn't Dixon of Dock Green |
Precisely. If they'll deny they want to a domestic altercation at boris johnson's house, they'll do anything. If you think things have changed materially since the Birmingham Six, or the Guildford Four (and a string of other cases going back to the foundation of police services in the 1830s) you're so very, very wrong. [Post edited 21 Jun 2019 22:06]
| |
| |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:06 - Jun 21 with 3711 views | gtsb |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:03 - Jun 21 by BloomBlue | Dont be silly it's totally acceptable for a few innocent people to be killed so long as everybody's liberty is protected. No you are totally correct with your Bellfield example. |
Mind boggling isn't it that people who would never dream of doing anything wrong are for protecting people who would gladly murder and rape. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:07 - Jun 21 with 3711 views | Ftnfwest | No I think we should be giving criminals every chance we can to get away with it | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:08 - Jun 21 with 3703 views | gtsb |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:06 - Jun 21 by factual_blue | Precisely. If they'll deny they want to a domestic altercation at boris johnson's house, they'll do anything. If you think things have changed materially since the Birmingham Six, or the Guildford Four (and a string of other cases going back to the foundation of police services in the 1830s) you're so very, very wrong. [Post edited 21 Jun 2019 22:06]
|
Evidence has. | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:12 - Jun 21 with 3684 views | BlueBadger |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:08 - Jun 21 by gtsb | Evidence has. |
DNA evidence, like fingerprinting, psychological profiling and forensic pathology is not the legal panacea you're making it out to be. It's very simplistic to say 'it caught Steve Wright', there'a all sorts of other factors to rule out. Like with the above. http://www.nature.com/news/forensic-dna-evidence-is-not-infallible-1.18654 [Post edited 21 Jun 2019 22:14]
| |
| |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:13 - Jun 21 with 3672 views | BloomBlue |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:06 - Jun 21 by gtsb | Mind boggling isn't it that people who would never dream of doing anything wrong are for protecting people who would gladly murder and rape. |
I find it amazing that some people get upset that a government has created child poverty but say it's acceptable for a child like Milly Dowler to be killed rather than everyone giving DNA because its against people's liberty. | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:15 - Jun 21 with 3654 views | BlueBadger |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:13 - Jun 21 by BloomBlue | I find it amazing that some people get upset that a government has created child poverty but say it's acceptable for a child like Milly Dowler to be killed rather than everyone giving DNA because its against people's liberty. |
Yes, that's exactly what we're saying here. | |
| |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:18 - Jun 21 with 3643 views | gtsb |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:12 - Jun 21 by BlueBadger | DNA evidence, like fingerprinting, psychological profiling and forensic pathology is not the legal panacea you're making it out to be. It's very simplistic to say 'it caught Steve Wright', there'a all sorts of other factors to rule out. Like with the above. http://www.nature.com/news/forensic-dna-evidence-is-not-infallible-1.18654 [Post edited 21 Jun 2019 22:14]
|
We are not talking about hanging here. Circumstantial evidence is always used too. DNA is a massive tool to solving crime. Nobody should be worried. Or should they.... | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:30 - Jun 21 with 3596 views | BloomBlue |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:15 - Jun 21 by BlueBadger | Yes, that's exactly what we're saying here. |
Well if you think the rape and murder of Milly Dowler is acceptable for liberty so be it. | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:30 - Jun 21 with 3598 views | jeera |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:06 - Jun 21 by gtsb | Mind boggling isn't it that people who would never dream of doing anything wrong are for protecting people who would gladly murder and rape. |
"...protecting people who would gladly murder and rape." No one has suggested anything of the sort. This is why it becomes difficult to discuss things when this sort of rhetoric comes straight out. You're normally more sensible than that. | |
| |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:32 - Jun 21 with 3591 views | jeera |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:30 - Jun 21 by BloomBlue | Well if you think the rape and murder of Milly Dowler is acceptable for liberty so be it. |
Shame on you. | |
| |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:34 - Jun 21 with 3591 views | gtsb |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:30 - Jun 21 by jeera | "...protecting people who would gladly murder and rape." No one has suggested anything of the sort. This is why it becomes difficult to discuss things when this sort of rhetoric comes straight out. You're normally more sensible than that. |
I am being sensible. What have people got to hide . Why are people so objectionable. Murders and rapes could be solved in an instance if we had a complete DNA database. | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:34 - Jun 21 with 3588 views | BloomBlue |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:30 - Jun 21 by jeera | "...protecting people who would gladly murder and rape." No one has suggested anything of the sort. This is why it becomes difficult to discuss things when this sort of rhetoric comes straight out. You're normally more sensible than that. |
My point is if everyone gave their DNA many murders would have been prevented, hence I believe giving DNA should be mandatory for everyone | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:49 - Jun 21 with 3551 views | Rocky | i find it odd that any assistance in proving serious crime should be resisted. Should we reject a database of fingerprint evidence as well? | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 23:56 - Jun 21 with 3486 views | The_Last_Baron | Absolutely not.The state encroaches on our freedoms more than enough already. | |
| |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 23:59 - Jun 21 with 3483 views | Warhurst | And what happens with this new law when the majority of the population don't want anything to do with it? Do you try and force them? | | | |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 00:08 - Jun 22 with 3474 views | Ryorry |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 21:57 - Jun 21 by factual_blue | The police have never, ever fitted anybody up, have they? |
Nor has there ever been any racism or anti-Semitism ... | |
| |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 00:11 - Jun 22 with 3465 views | Ryorry |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:34 - Jun 21 by gtsb | I am being sensible. What have people got to hide . Why are people so objectionable. Murders and rapes could be solved in an instance if we had a complete DNA database. |
My god you're naive. | |
| |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 00:19 - Jun 22 with 3456 views | WeWereZombies |
Should everyone's DNA be taken on 22:34 - Jun 21 by gtsb | I am being sensible. What have people got to hide . Why are people so objectionable. Murders and rapes could be solved in an instance if we had a complete DNA database. |
I think you mean 'solved in an instant', consider though what you would do if you wanted to commit a crime and knew that it could be pinned on someone else in an instant just by planting their DNA in the right place... | |
| |
| |