Robbed! 19:03 - Nov 23 with 5536 views | Ipswich_Crazy | Clearly over the line! Bring in Goal line tech in League one! | |
| | |
Robbed! on 19:06 - Nov 23 with 4393 views | Bluefish | I'm not convinced it was over but it shows why all professional football should have goal line technology. It is the technology in football that actually works and doesn't ruin the game | |
| |
Robbed! on 19:08 - Nov 23 with 4371 views | hammo56 | No way it was over the line. Was right behind the goal and the ball was cleared before it went over. | | | |
Robbed! on 19:08 - Nov 23 with 4368 views | Ipswich_Crazy |
Robbed! on 19:06 - Nov 23 by Bluefish | I'm not convinced it was over but it shows why all professional football should have goal line technology. It is the technology in football that actually works and doesn't ruin the game |
It was over, I was behind the goal and the ball was well over the line! | |
| |
Robbed! on 19:16 - Nov 23 with 4300 views | EastTownBlue | The cost of £250k per a ground to install GLT will probably go against that idea. | | | |
Robbed! on 19:16 - Nov 23 with 4303 views | Herbivore |
Robbed! on 19:08 - Nov 23 by hammo56 | No way it was over the line. Was right behind the goal and the ball was cleared before it went over. |
The picture seems to suggest otherwise. | |
| |
Robbed! on 19:22 - Nov 23 with 4258 views | Bluefish |
Robbed! on 19:16 - Nov 23 by Herbivore | The picture seems to suggest otherwise. |
The picture is inconclusive | |
| |
Robbed! on 19:23 - Nov 23 with 4252 views | Herbivore |
Robbed! on 19:22 - Nov 23 by Bluefish | The picture is inconclusive |
There's a gap between the ball and the goal line in the OP's picture. | |
| |
Robbed! on 19:33 - Nov 23 with 4160 views | Wickets | No it was never close to being over . | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Robbed! on 19:46 - Nov 23 with 4037 views | EastTownBlue |
Robbed! on 19:08 - Nov 23 by Ipswich_Crazy | It was over, I was behind the goal and the ball was well over the line! |
You weren't in line though. Sadly neither was the lino having taken a copule of side steps to the corner flag after the clearance. Horse, door, stable, bolted ... [Post edited 23 Nov 2019 19:47]
| | | |
Robbed! on 19:46 - Nov 23 with 4039 views | sparks |
Robbed! on 19:33 - Nov 23 by Wickets | No it was never close to being over . |
What is interesting- is people "behind the goal" are claiming certainty. Which is quite silly given their angle of view. On telly it looked over. But the camera angle made it impossible to be at all certain. | |
| The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely to be preferred to the presence of those who think they've found it.
(Sir Terry Pratchett) | Poll: | Is Fred drunk this morning? |
| |
Robbed! on 19:53 - Nov 23 with 3957 views | ElderGrizzly |
Robbed! on 19:06 - Nov 23 by Bluefish | I'm not convinced it was over but it shows why all professional football should have goal line technology. It is the technology in football that actually works and doesn't ruin the game |
Looks over. Just...
| | | |
Robbed! on 19:56 - Nov 23 with 3956 views | EastTownBlue |
Robbed! on 19:46 - Nov 23 by sparks | What is interesting- is people "behind the goal" are claiming certainty. Which is quite silly given their angle of view. On telly it looked over. But the camera angle made it impossible to be at all certain. |
I suspect that it was over the line. However I recall from my refereeing training a number of years ago they demonstrated the diffuculty in determining when the whole of the ball has crossed the whole of the line. Just because a gap can be seen between the ball and the goalline, there could still be millimeters of the ball that has yet to cross the line. | | | |
Robbed! on 19:59 - Nov 23 with 3916 views | Wickets |
Robbed! on 19:46 - Nov 23 by sparks | What is interesting- is people "behind the goal" are claiming certainty. Which is quite silly given their angle of view. On telly it looked over. But the camera angle made it impossible to be at all certain. |
Well i'm wrong it was close to being over and maybe with Goal line Tec it would have been given . | | | |
Robbed! on 20:00 - Nov 23 with 3902 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Robbed! on 19:53 - Nov 23 by ElderGrizzly | Looks over. Just...
|
I thought it was over from behind the goal but, as Sparks says you can't tell from that angle. The picture above is inconclusive. If the ball was in contact with the ground then yes, but as it isn't it is inconclusive. The only way you can be sure is with a photo from above the crossbar or in line with the goal. No linesman can ever be absolutely certain hence why goal line technology came in. | |
| |
Robbed! on 20:34 - Nov 23 with 3685 views | Bluefish |
Robbed! on 19:23 - Nov 23 by Herbivore | There's a gap between the ball and the goal line in the OP's picture. |
You know how the rule works don't you? | |
| |
Robbed! on 20:39 - Nov 23 with 3672 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
Robbed! on 20:34 - Nov 23 by Bluefish | You know how the rule works don't you? |
I think the issue is with the physics and perspective rather than interpreting the rules. | |
| |
Robbed! on 20:53 - Nov 23 with 3570 views | ITFC_Forever |
Robbed! on 19:23 - Nov 23 by Herbivore | There's a gap between the ball and the goal line in the OP's picture. |
All of the ball must be over all of the line when viewed from directly above.... so when viewed from the side, it is possible to see grass between the base of the ball and the line, as the base of the ball will be further in to the goal. Same principle as when numskulls get wrongly over-excited about being able to see grass between the ball and the corner quadrant at corners. | |
| |
Robbed! on 20:55 - Nov 23 with 3562 views | Pinewoodblue |
Robbed! on 19:16 - Nov 23 by EastTownBlue | The cost of £250k per a ground to install GLT will probably go against that idea. |
We had it last season so unless it has been removed it is still there. | |
| |
Robbed! on 21:01 - Nov 23 with 3523 views | blueislander |
Robbed! on 19:53 - Nov 23 by ElderGrizzly | Looks over. Just...
|
That angle is useless. | | | |
Robbed! on 21:04 - Nov 23 with 3502 views | Bluefish |
Robbed! on 19:53 - Nov 23 by ElderGrizzly | Looks over. Just...
|
Looking at the distance it tell me that it probably wasn't over the line | |
| |
Robbed! on 21:07 - Nov 23 with 3486 views | Sarge | Also their second goal was a clear dive and the first goal...are we just ignoring head injury rules now? Ridiculous referee, how he’s allowed to officiate the championship too is beyond me. | | | |
Robbed! on 22:26 - Nov 23 with 3137 views | EastTownBlue |
Robbed! on 20:55 - Nov 23 by Pinewoodblue | We had it last season so unless it has been removed it is still there. |
Cameras at the back of the Co-op stand have been removed. | | | |
Robbed! on 22:48 - Nov 23 with 3021 views | Sarge |
Robbed! on 21:07 - Nov 23 by Sarge | Also their second goal was a clear dive and the first goal...are we just ignoring head injury rules now? Ridiculous referee, how he’s allowed to officiate the championship too is beyond me. |
Hi daveU! You ever gonna contribute something to the board mate, or just creep around it like some kind of mildew? | | | |
Robbed! on 22:52 - Nov 23 with 2981 views | patrickswell | Second time in a month a lack of goal-line technology has potentially cost us a goal. It’s as though the footballing fates have conspired to Fock us over in another way, now that we are no longer likely to be reffed by Keith Stroud. | | | |
Robbed! on 22:58 - Nov 23 with 2952 views | Ryorry |
Robbed! on 19:46 - Nov 23 by sparks | What is interesting- is people "behind the goal" are claiming certainty. Which is quite silly given their angle of view. On telly it looked over. But the camera angle made it impossible to be at all certain. |
The whole ball looked over by several inches on the EFL show on Quest. Recorded & will look at replay in slo-mo to confirm. Will be on their +1 show (freeview 76 I think) in 2 mins. Update: camera angle actually makes it impossible to know for sure. [Post edited 23 Nov 2019 23:14]
| |
| |
| |