Forum | Will it be better to play teams who need something? by Axeldalai_lama

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Will it be better to play teams who need something? 08:50 - Mar 17 with 376 views

I know the old rule about playing teams who have nothing to play for, but might it work for us if teams are battling for points and don't just park the bus?
Just a thought.

Will it be better to play teams who need something? on 08:55 - Mar 17 with 350 views

Guthrum

Depends whether they're battling for three points or just the one.

Also, teams have seen enough examples of what happens if you try to play proper football against Ipswich, as against what fierce pressing, tight marking, compact defence and a quick, opportunistic break can achieve. We might get some joy facing sides with a lot of confidence in their abilities, but anything asymmetric is likely to be tough and chewy.

	Good Lord! Whatever is it?
Poll:	McCarthy: A More Nuanced Poll
Blog:	[Blog] For Those Panicking About the Lack of Transfer Activity

Will it be better to play teams who need something? on 08:55 - Mar 17 with 343 views

TRUE_BLUE123

Teams who are lower mid table with nothing to play for are always the best imo.

QPR on the last day could be ideal

Poll:

Will Paul Lambert be Ipswich Town manager on the final day of this season ?

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread