| Waghorn off on 20:07 - Jul 29 with 2180 views | Kieran_Knows |
.... or it could be Tom Bradshaw, as per the story. |  |
|  |
| Waghorn off on 20:07 - Jul 29 with 2181 views | DanFord |
Load of tosh that. He’s not asked to leave and we won’t be accepting £4m. They’ve just put twinand two together and got 31 |  |
| |
| Waghorn off on 20:07 - Jul 29 with 2178 views | Superblue95 |
You're about a week late |  |
| |
| Waghorn off on 20:09 - Jul 29 with 2140 views | KieranMcKenna1 |
| Waghorn off on 20:07 - Jul 29 by Kieran_Knows |
.... or it could be Tom Bradshaw, as per the story. |
Don't think Barnsley will sell and Jackson would be cheaper and easier to do. |  |
| |
| Waghorn off on 20:11 - Jul 29 with 2107 views | jeera |
Makes sense to refuse his leave until a new guy is in place.
No problem with that if Hurst stands by it. |  |
| |
| Waghorn off on 20:11 - Jul 29 with 2100 views | Kieran_Knows |
| Waghorn off on 20:09 - Jul 29 by KieranMcKenna1 |
Don't think Barnsley will sell and Jackson would be cheaper and easier to do. |
Barnsley were reportedly looking at a fee of £1.5m a few weeks back when Millwall we’re offering £800k for him.
I’d prefer to spend £1.5m on Bradshaw than £1.25m on Jackson considering Bradshaw has scored at this level. | |
| |
| Waghorn off on 20:12 - Jul 29 with 2065 views | jeera |
| Waghorn off on 20:07 - Jul 29 by DanFord |
Load of tosh that. He’s not asked to leave and we won’t be accepting £4m. They’ve just put twinand two together and got 31 |
It doesn't suggest we'd be accepting 4.
It says the offer is along the lines of 4 up front. | |
| |
| Waghorn off on 20:12 - Jul 29 with 2063 views | KieranMcKenna1 |
| Waghorn off on 20:11 - Jul 29 by Kieran_Knows |
Barnsley were reportedly looking at a fee of £1.5m a few weeks back when Millwall we’re offering £800k for him.
I’d prefer to spend £1.5m on Bradshaw than £1.25m on Jackson considering Bradshaw has scored at this level. |
I agree. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Waghorn off on 20:20 - Jul 29 with 1946 views | ElderGrizzly |
Not for £4m up front, when we’ve already turned down £5m up front and not to Derby unless they sell Vydra first and he just priced himself out of a move to Leeds.
I’m sure Waghorn will go somewhere, but now with Boro selling Bamford to Leeds for £7m, that is maybe where? And if Bamford is worth £7m, Waghorn is worth £10m! [Post edited 29 Jul 2018 20:22]
|  | | |
| Waghorn off on 20:23 - Jul 29 with 1889 views | KieranMcKenna1 |
| Waghorn off on 20:20 - Jul 29 by ElderGrizzly |
Not for £4m up front, when we’ve already turned down £5m up front and not to Derby unless they sell Vydra first and he just priced himself out of a move to Leeds.
I’m sure Waghorn will go somewhere, but now with Boro selling Bamford to Leeds for £7m, that is maybe where? And if Bamford is worth £7m, Waghorn is worth £10m! [Post edited 29 Jul 2018 20:22]
|
That guy clearly knows something though as he was the first to break Webster and Harrison news. | |
| |
| Waghorn off on 20:24 - Jul 29 with 1888 views | ITFCBlues |
| Waghorn off on 20:20 - Jul 29 by ElderGrizzly |
Not for £4m up front, when we’ve already turned down £5m up front and not to Derby unless they sell Vydra first and he just priced himself out of a move to Leeds.
I’m sure Waghorn will go somewhere, but now with Boro selling Bamford to Leeds for £7m, that is maybe where? And if Bamford is worth £7m, Waghorn is worth £10m! [Post edited 29 Jul 2018 20:22]
|
This is the same bloke who reported it last week. Perhaps the add ins make
more sense now and they will happen as such which is why we’ve accepted the offer. It could be that it’s 4m up front and 2m over the next year as an example. Not entirely impossible |  |
| |
| Waghorn off on 20:25 - Jul 29 with 1868 views | ElderGrizzly |
| Waghorn off on 20:24 - Jul 29 by ITFCBlues |
This is the same bloke who reported it last week. Perhaps the add ins make
more sense now and they will happen as such which is why we’ve accepted the offer. It could be that it’s 4m up front and 2m over the next year as an example. Not entirely impossible |
I’ve no doubt Waghorn will be off, just not for the figures mentioned. It would almost have to guarantee the £8m over the next couple of years, none of these clauses that are less likely than Benters hugging a refugee | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
