Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
So something like this? 20:24 - Aug 7 with 4868 viewsagentp

OUT
Webster 2.8m
Academy sales 1.5m
UEFA 0.4
WAGHORN AND GARNER 5.1m
Total £9.7m

IN
Donacien 0.75m
Harrison 0.75m
Edwards 0.75m
Loans 0.8m
Windass 2m
Jackson 2m
Nsiala and Nolan 2m
Another defender 0.7m
TOTAL 9.65m

With wages saving for another freebie, loans, contract strengthening etc.

[Post edited 7 Aug 2018 20:32]

Poll: If only these two were available who would you choose for the rest of the season

1
So something like this? on 20:25 - Aug 7 with 3226 viewswkj

Emergency loans (90 day loans) are no longer are a thing.
[Post edited 7 Aug 2018 20:26]

Crybaby
Poll: Who do you want to have win the playoffs then?
Blog: The Identity Crisis of Modern Football

1
So something like this? on 20:27 - Aug 7 with 3179 viewsElderGrizzly

As mentioned below, we have to account for the full potential value of the Edwards and Harrison deals, so that is £3m, not £1.5m

1
So something like this? on 20:29 - Aug 7 with 3149 viewsagentp

So something like this? on 20:25 - Aug 7 by wkj

Emergency loans (90 day loans) are no longer are a thing.
[Post edited 7 Aug 2018 20:26]


Realise that. Wrong terminology, I mean an extra loan if needed before the loan window closes

Poll: If only these two were available who would you choose for the rest of the season

1
So something like this? on 20:29 - Aug 7 with 3129 viewspointofblue

And we're paying the new players in fresh air? Yes, they may be on lower wages than those who have left but there's more of them too - I doubt the difference will be that much.

I wouldn't be at all surprised if Garner stays and we don't sign Windass.

I guess one thing we're not considering in the maths is Hurst and Doig are surely on less than McCarthy and Connor? So there will be some money saved there which could be reinvested elsewhere.

Poll: Who would you play at right centre back on Saturday?

2
So something like this? on 20:30 - Aug 7 with 3120 viewsSitfcB

Garner will go for more than £100,000. If at all.

COYB
Poll: What will today’s 10 pager be
Blog: [Blog] One Year On

0
So something like this? on 20:30 - Aug 7 with 3102 viewsagentp

So something like this? on 20:27 - Aug 7 by ElderGrizzly

As mentioned below, we have to account for the full potential value of the Edwards and Harrison deals, so that is £3m, not £1.5m



Depends what the add ons are.

Poll: If only these two were available who would you choose for the rest of the season

0
So something like this? on 20:32 - Aug 7 with 3067 viewsITFCBlues

So something like this? on 20:27 - Aug 7 by ElderGrizzly

As mentioned below, we have to account for the full potential value of the Edwards and Harrison deals, so that is £3m, not £1.5m



In fairness, we have no idea what this top ups are. It could be another 1m for each of we win promotion by which point we’d be rolling in it anyways!

Poll: Has our squad been improved this summer?

0
So something like this? on 20:32 - Aug 7 with 3058 viewsElderGrizzly

So something like this? on 20:30 - Aug 7 by agentp

Depends what the add ons are.


We have to account for the full value of the transfer, no matter what the add-ons are.

A value has to be applied for accounting terms and to pass an audit.
0
Login to get fewer ads

So something like this? on 20:32 - Aug 7 with 3048 viewsFtnfwest

Have we got any dodgy cash from magical Vegas yet?
0
So something like this? on 20:33 - Aug 7 with 3042 viewswkj

So something like this? on 20:30 - Aug 7 by agentp

Depends what the add ons are.


The way clubs should treat addons are potential earnings on next season's budgets if they are incoming, and definite outgoings for the current season - That is the only way to really guarantee to avoid being caught short

Crybaby
Poll: Who do you want to have win the playoffs then?
Blog: The Identity Crisis of Modern Football

1
So something like this? on 20:33 - Aug 7 with 3029 viewsITFCBlues

So something like this? on 20:32 - Aug 7 by ElderGrizzly

We have to account for the full value of the transfer, no matter what the add-ons are.

A value has to be applied for accounting terms and to pass an audit.


Even if that is the case, there is nothing to stop Evans not covering those additional add ons, depending on their nature of course

Poll: Has our squad been improved this summer?

0
So something like this? on 20:34 - Aug 7 with 3024 viewsElderGrizzly

So something like this? on 20:32 - Aug 7 by ITFCBlues

In fairness, we have no idea what this top ups are. It could be another 1m for each of we win promotion by which point we’d be rolling in it anyways!


It was mentioned both were deals totalling £1.5m. So if true, that is what we have to use.

My point is we can’t just account for the initial £750k which is what most are making the mistake of doing to declare we have more cash than we actually do
1
So something like this? on 20:34 - Aug 7 with 3025 viewsKieranMcKenna1

So something like this? on 20:27 - Aug 7 by ElderGrizzly

As mentioned below, we have to account for the full potential value of the Edwards and Harrison deals, so that is £3m, not £1.5m



Stop spouting B0llocks it's getting annoying....

This is more like it.. Check out @Stuart_Watson’s Tweet:

Poll: Are you Mick out or Mick in?

0
So something like this? on 20:34 - Aug 7 with 3018 viewsSitfcB

So something like this? on 20:32 - Aug 7 by Ftnfwest

Have we got any dodgy cash from magical Vegas yet?


We lost it all on the roulette 😒

COYB
Poll: What will today’s 10 pager be
Blog: [Blog] One Year On

0
So something like this? on 20:35 - Aug 7 with 3005 viewswkj

So something like this? on 20:33 - Aug 7 by ITFCBlues

Even if that is the case, there is nothing to stop Evans not covering those additional add ons, depending on their nature of course


Nothing except his willingness to do so, which he almost certainly is covering the running cost of the club for the year out of his pocket and I wouldn't imagine he is likely to extend further than this.

Crybaby
Poll: Who do you want to have win the playoffs then?
Blog: The Identity Crisis of Modern Football

0
So something like this? on 20:35 - Aug 7 with 3010 viewsPhilTWTD

Re Webster was £3m after the Pompey sell-on or more accurately £2.95m as they got £550,000 initially (20 per cent of profit on the £750,000 we paid them including Matt Clarke).

Only a million for the academy sales as Flores hasn't been confirmed yet, but will happen. Garner hasn't gone yet! And I suspect he won't.

Don't think we'll sign both Jackson and Windass.
0
So something like this? on 20:36 - Aug 7 with 2981 viewsFtnfwest

So something like this? on 20:34 - Aug 7 by SitfcB

We lost it all on the roulette 😒


J2 put it all on red?
0
So something like this? on 20:36 - Aug 7 with 2977 viewsElderGrizzly

So something like this? on 20:34 - Aug 7 by KieranMcKenna1

Stop spouting B0llocks it's getting annoying....

This is more like it.. Check out @Stuart_Watson’s Tweet:


We are both right actually, as he is counting the initial fee only. It was discussed earlier....

Sorry, for annoying you...
0
So something like this? on 20:37 - Aug 7 with 2951 viewsElderGrizzly

So something like this? on 20:35 - Aug 7 by wkj

Nothing except his willingness to do so, which he almost certainly is covering the running cost of the club for the year out of his pocket and I wouldn't imagine he is likely to extend further than this.


Which is still £6m a year before we start doing anything else
1
So something like this? on 20:40 - Aug 7 with 2896 viewsagentp

So something like this? on 20:32 - Aug 7 by ElderGrizzly

We have to account for the full value of the transfer, no matter what the add-ons are.

A value has to be applied for accounting terms and to pass an audit.


Budget figures and accounting are different things.

It would be prudent to calculate red line figures - such as clauses triggered for appearance/performance.

Not so with green line figures. Payments triggered on a profit sale. They would only be triggered if the player profits and therefore is not a red overhead.

Poll: If only these two were available who would you choose for the rest of the season

0
So something like this? on 20:40 - Aug 7 with 2898 viewsitfcjoe

So something like this? on 20:27 - Aug 7 by ElderGrizzly

As mentioned below, we have to account for the full potential value of the Edwards and Harrison deals, so that is £3m, not £1.5m



I don't see that we do, they are noted in the accounts but not in the P&L or Balance Sheet

Poll: Club vs country? What would you choose
Blog: What is Going on With the Academy at Ipswich Town?

1
So something like this? on 20:42 - Aug 7 with 2850 viewsSitfcB

So something like this? on 20:36 - Aug 7 by Ftnfwest

J2 put it all on red?


Yes, we won that spin, and then Rommy put it all on black and lost it. Is why he’s left the board.

COYB
Poll: What will today’s 10 pager be
Blog: [Blog] One Year On

1
So something like this? on 20:43 - Aug 7 with 2837 viewsitfcjoe

I don't see why Knight and Flores fees would go into transfer budget and not academy budget for future years.

Also, why would that FIFA money go into transfer budget rather than general running costs

Poll: Club vs country? What would you choose
Blog: What is Going on With the Academy at Ipswich Town?

0
So something like this? on 20:43 - Aug 7 with 2825 viewsElderGrizzly

So something like this? on 20:40 - Aug 7 by itfcjoe

I don't see that we do, they are noted in the accounts but not in the P&L or Balance Sheet


Which is exactly what I meant and you have to do to meet accounting standards.

The point is we are acknowledging a potential outlay to come and we will need to provide for it somehow if you want to be prudent.
0
So something like this? on 20:43 - Aug 7 with 2824 viewsagentp

The post speculates on the potential ins and outs that's all.

Poll: If only these two were available who would you choose for the rest of the season

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2024