| John Marquis? 17:49 - Feb 17 with 1960 views | GerkensBeard |
Target for number 9 next season? Scored loads in league 1 this year. Battering ram.
Mind you if he stays I think Will Keane could end up league 1 top scorer
|  | | |  |
| John Marquis? on 17:57 - Feb 17 with 1898 views | Pecker |
Not sure will be able to afford him. |  | | |
| John Marquis? on 18:06 - Feb 17 with 1864 views | factual_blue |
Can you Count on Marquis though? |  |
| |
| John Marquis? on 18:31 - Feb 17 with 1796 views | PJH |
| John Marquis? on 18:06 - Feb 17 by factual_blue |
Can you Count on Marquis though? |
Clever that although I have just discovered that Marquis is above Count. |  | | |
| John Marquis? on 18:34 - Feb 17 with 1781 views | Pendejo |
| John Marquis? on 18:31 - Feb 17 by PJH |
Clever that although I have just discovered that Marquis is above Count. |
Earl bet he has a Baron spell Viscount on him. |  |
| |
| John Marquis? on 18:37 - Feb 17 with 1765 views | factual_blue |
| John Marquis? on 18:31 - Feb 17 by PJH |
Clever that although I have just discovered that Marquis is above Count. |
The theoretical distinction between a marquess and other titles has, since the Middle Ages, faded into obscurity. In times past, the distinction between a count and a marquess was that the land of a marquess, called a march, was on the border of the country, while a count's land, called a county, often was not. As a result of this, a marquess was trusted to defend and fortify against potentially hostile neighbours and was thus more important and ranked higher than a count. The title is ranked below that of a duke, which was often largely restricted to the royal family. | |
| |
| John Marquis? on 18:39 - Feb 17 with 1759 views | Pendejo |
| John Marquis? on 18:37 - Feb 17 by factual_blue |
The theoretical distinction between a marquess and other titles has, since the Middle Ages, faded into obscurity. In times past, the distinction between a count and a marquess was that the land of a marquess, called a march, was on the border of the country, while a count's land, called a county, often was not. As a result of this, a marquess was trusted to defend and fortify against potentially hostile neighbours and was thus more important and ranked higher than a count. The title is ranked below that of a duke, which was often largely restricted to the royal family. |
Now please explain Earl and Baron, can't be bothered to Google it. | |
| |
| John Marquis? on 18:41 - Feb 17 with 1754 views | PJH |
| John Marquis? on 18:37 - Feb 17 by factual_blue |
The theoretical distinction between a marquess and other titles has, since the Middle Ages, faded into obscurity. In times past, the distinction between a count and a marquess was that the land of a marquess, called a march, was on the border of the country, while a count's land, called a county, often was not. As a result of this, a marquess was trusted to defend and fortify against potentially hostile neighbours and was thus more important and ranked higher than a count. The title is ranked below that of a duke, which was often largely restricted to the royal family. |
I am sure that everyone in Ixworth knows all that but it is/was not such common knowledge in Woodbridge. | | | |
| John Marquis? on 18:43 - Feb 17 with 1736 views | monty_radio |
| John Marquis? on 18:41 - Feb 17 by PJH |
I am sure that everyone in Ixworth knows all that but it is/was not such common knowledge in Woodbridge. |
Certainly not common knowledge. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| John Marquis? on 18:50 - Feb 17 with 1717 views | factual_blue |
| John Marquis? on 18:39 - Feb 17 by Pendejo |
Now please explain Earl and Baron, can't be bothered to Google it. |
Earl - below a duke.
Baron - lowest rank of the nobility. Hereditary knighthoods are baronetcys.
Many years ago I knew of a mere middle-ranking Department of Health civil servant who was the holder of an hereditary baronetcy. Apparently he had to be kept out of jobs that would bring him into contact with the (tory) Secretary of State, who couldn't bring himself to address the poor chap correctly. | |
| |
| John Marquis? on 19:51 - Feb 17 with 1619 views | Pendejo |
| John Marquis? on 18:50 - Feb 17 by factual_blue |
Earl - below a duke.
Baron - lowest rank of the nobility. Hereditary knighthoods are baronetcys.
Many years ago I knew of a mere middle-ranking Department of Health civil servant who was the holder of an hereditary baronetcy. Apparently he had to be kept out of jobs that would bring him into contact with the (tory) Secretary of State, who couldn't bring himself to address the poor chap correctly. |
Earl below Duke but above Marquess? | |
| |
| John Marquis? on 00:13 - Feb 18 with 1396 views | MrTown |
Far fetched, yes the day has come where a Doncaster Rovers striker in the league below with 12 months left on his contract is too far stretched for us. What a world hey!
But realistically, Sunderland couldn't get the deal done in January, obviously went with Will Grigg in the end, but would imagine given his recent season record he may attract attention from lower end of the Championship next season.
The summer window will be freebies only, now more than ever.
Evans will think our squad is strong enough to get out of L1 untouched, and I'm we will add a few frees mainly in the defensive area. |  |
| |
| John Marquis? on 08:21 - Feb 18 with 1262 views | GlasgowBlue |
If we do go down I don’t think we need to spend a single penny in order to come back up. So long as we don’t sell any of our youngsters.
I fur one will be glad to see the end of this conveyor belt of bringing in six or seven signings or loanees every season. |  |
| |
| John Marquis? on 09:17 - Feb 18 with 1193 views | MrTown |
| John Marquis? on 08:21 - Feb 18 by GlasgowBlue |
If we do go down I don’t think we need to spend a single penny in order to come back up. So long as we don’t sell any of our youngsters.
I fur one will be glad to see the end of this conveyor belt of bringing in six or seven signings or loanees every season. |
Will need a full back on both sides. Cover or starting line up, but we are going to lose Knudsen and Spence. They need replacing in some way shape or form.
I like Conor McLaughlin from Millwall, v credible player. But James Bree would be my first RB.
Not sure about the LB situation, maybe Elder again but would prefer a permanent signing. | |
| |
| John Marquis? on 09:26 - Feb 18 with 1173 views | JonBlue |
| John Marquis? on 19:51 - Feb 17 by Pendejo |
Earl below Duke but above Marquess? |
Duke
Marquis
Earl
Viscount
Baron
Back to the football, with the new much lower L1 budget paying fees for players seems unlikely to me. |  | | |
| John Marquis? on 13:01 - Feb 18 with 1016 views | Alabaster_Codify |
Christ...did you watch him yesterday!?
Couldn't hit a barn door & we already have enough of those |  |
| No thanks...I don't do the horse |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
