I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days 12:48 - Feb 7 with 4063 views | MaySixth | harsh or fair? |  |
| |  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:50 - Feb 7 with 3831 views | Reuser_is_God | Our centre backs in order of ability.... 1. Woolfenden 2. Chambers 3. Wilson Anything else is wrong. |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:52 - Feb 7 with 3812 views | MaySixth |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:50 - Feb 7 by Reuser_is_God | Our centre backs in order of ability.... 1. Woolfenden 2. Chambers 3. Wilson Anything else is wrong. |
Disagree based on what I have seen home and away this season. |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:53 - Feb 7 with 3800 views | Herbivore |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:52 - Feb 7 by MaySixth | Disagree based on what I have seen home and away this season. |
Which, I'm guessing, isn't much. |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:55 - Feb 7 with 3791 views | Dubtractor |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:50 - Feb 7 by Reuser_is_God | Our centre backs in order of ability.... 1. Woolfenden 2. Chambers 3. Wilson Anything else is wrong. |
Not difficult is it? We all know Chambers is in the twilight of his career, but he is still lots better than Wilson. Wilson is fine FWIW, but is ultimately just a very limited stopper. |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:55 - Feb 7 with 3792 views | Swansea_Blue |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:50 - Feb 7 by Reuser_is_God | Our centre backs in order of ability.... 1. Woolfenden 2. Chambers 3. Wilson Anything else is wrong. |
This. And for a little bit of context: 1. The Beat 2. Butcher 3. Mogga 4. McA 5. De Vos 6. Woolf 7. Chambers 8. Smith 9. Wilson 10. Toto 11. Ingimarsson 12. Fish |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:56 - Feb 7 with 3785 views | Reuser_is_God |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:55 - Feb 7 by Dubtractor | Not difficult is it? We all know Chambers is in the twilight of his career, but he is still lots better than Wilson. Wilson is fine FWIW, but is ultimately just a very limited stopper. |
Yeah, this. |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 13:12 - Feb 7 with 3747 views | itfcjoe | Wrong. Wilson is way off it |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 13:36 - Feb 7 with 3721 views | homer_123 |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:52 - Feb 7 by MaySixth | Disagree based on what I have seen home and away this season. |
|  |
|  | Login to get fewer ads
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 13:43 - Feb 7 with 3700 views | Sharkey |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:55 - Feb 7 by Swansea_Blue | This. And for a little bit of context: 1. The Beat 2. Butcher 3. Mogga 4. McA 5. De Vos 6. Woolf 7. Chambers 8. Smith 9. Wilson 10. Toto 11. Ingimarsson 12. Fish |
Is McA a typo or have I forgotten a semi-legendary figure? |  | |  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 13:45 - Feb 7 with 3696 views | Pecker | Woolfenden and Chambers are the best partnership with Wilson as back up. |  | |  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 13:55 - Feb 7 with 3674 views | TRUE_BLUE123 | Wrong. |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 13:59 - Feb 7 with 3652 views | rickw |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 13:43 - Feb 7 by Sharkey | Is McA a typo or have I forgotten a semi-legendary figure? |
Macauley however I'd out De Vos ahead of him |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 13:59 - Feb 7 with 3649 views | TractorCam |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 13:43 - Feb 7 by Sharkey | Is McA a typo or have I forgotten a semi-legendary figure? |
Gareth McAuley |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 14:03 - Feb 7 with 3633 views | Herbivore |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 13:59 - Feb 7 by rickw | Macauley however I'd out De Vos ahead of him |
Same, de Vos was WAY better for us. I think McAuley sometimes gets given extra kudos because he went on to do well for a few years in the Prem after leaving us. He was very hit and miss here, he had the turning circle of a cruise ship. |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 14:03 - Feb 7 with 3633 views | mr_bean |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:55 - Feb 7 by Swansea_Blue | This. And for a little bit of context: 1. The Beat 2. Butcher 3. Mogga 4. McA 5. De Vos 6. Woolf 7. Chambers 8. Smith 9. Wilson 10. Toto 11. Ingimarsson 12. Fish |
One important omission there: Osman! Has to be at least 4th (probably 3rd). ...and Hunter. [Post edited 7 Feb 2020 14:04]
|  | |  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 14:04 - Feb 7 with 3629 views | TheTrueBlue1878 |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:55 - Feb 7 by Dubtractor | Not difficult is it? We all know Chambers is in the twilight of his career, but he is still lots better than Wilson. Wilson is fine FWIW, but is ultimately just a very limited stopper. |
I think Chambers and Wilson are best as 'stopper' per say. I think having Chambers central/ Woolfenden right and Smith left would have been our best 3. But obviously we didn't get a deal done for Smith. |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 14:19 - Feb 7 with 3600 views | reusersfreekicks |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 14:04 - Feb 7 by TheTrueBlue1878 | I think Chambers and Wilson are best as 'stopper' per say. I think having Chambers central/ Woolfenden right and Smith left would have been our best 3. But obviously we didn't get a deal done for Smith. |
What on earth makes you think Smith would have been good foraging forward!! Limited with ball at his feet |  | |  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 15:01 - Feb 7 with 3555 views | jayessess |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:50 - Feb 7 by Reuser_is_God | Our centre backs in order of ability.... 1. Woolfenden 2. Chambers 3. Wilson Anything else is wrong. |
Took a friend to the Lincoln game and told him "Wilson is an old-school lower league stopper, for better or worse every single time he goes near the ball it'll end up out of play". Which is exactly what happened and was fine when the opposition were Lincoln, but not so much when it was Peterborough. |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 17:00 - Feb 7 with 3485 views | solemio |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:50 - Feb 7 by Reuser_is_God | Our centre backs in order of ability.... 1. Woolfenden 2. Chambers 3. Wilson Anything else is wrong. |
People who say that anyone who disagrees with their opinion is wrong can safely be ignored. If you disagree with this you are wrong. |  | |  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 17:19 - Feb 7 with 3459 views | Radlett_blue |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:50 - Feb 7 by Reuser_is_God | Our centre backs in order of ability.... 1. Woolfenden 2. Chambers 3. Wilson Anything else is wrong. |
The fact that Wilson, who seemed to be signed as a cheap squad filler/reserve, has become a regular starter is one of the reasons why we're struggling to stay in the top 6. A lower league journeyman whom Lincoln City were happy to let go. |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 18:28 - Feb 7 with 3418 views | Swansea_Blue |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 13:43 - Feb 7 by Sharkey | Is McA a typo or have I forgotten a semi-legendary figure? |
McAwful McAuly. Although I wasn’t too sure where to stick him, and I also had his career after he left us in mind. |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 18:30 - Feb 7 with 3417 views | chicoazul | What do you mean by "ability" though? |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 18:55 - Feb 7 with 3389 views | cbower |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:55 - Feb 7 by Swansea_Blue | This. And for a little bit of context: 1. The Beat 2. Butcher 3. Mogga 4. McA 5. De Vos 6. Woolf 7. Chambers 8. Smith 9. Wilson 10. Toto 11. Ingimarsson 12. Fish |
Osman, Hunter, even Delaney should appear well above some on that list |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 09:46 - Feb 8 with 3288 views | Dubtractor |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 18:55 - Feb 7 by cbower | Osman, Hunter, even Delaney should appear well above some on that list |
George Santos and Manu Thetis would be above the bottom 3. |  |
|  |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 09:50 - Feb 8 with 3282 views | Bluefish |
I'd put Wilson and Woolfenden ahead of Chambers in terms of ability these days on 12:50 - Feb 7 by Reuser_is_God | Our centre backs in order of ability.... 1. Woolfenden 2. Chambers 3. Wilson Anything else is wrong. |
It is possibly 1. Woolfenden 2. Chambers 10. Wilson Although LW is far from the finished consistent product |  |
|  |
| |