| might suit a few on 10:10 - Jun 3 with 1160 views | Plums |
No salary listed. Why would anyone even bother applying? |  |
|  |
| might suit a few on 10:17 - Jun 3 with 1091 views | Kieran_Knows |
I don't know if it's just me, but it's almost as if we know what were doing as a football club now. |  |
| |
| might suit a few on 10:22 - Jun 3 with 1046 views | Wallingford_Boy |
| might suit a few on 10:10 - Jun 3 by Plums |
No salary listed. Why would anyone even bother applying? |
Because its a job that interests them?
Salary is never lised on job specs anyway. |  |
| |
| might suit a few on 10:25 - Jun 3 with 1025 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| might suit a few on 10:22 - Jun 3 by Wallingford_Boy |
Because its a job that interests them?
Salary is never lised on job specs anyway. |
It should be, to save people going through a whole application and interview process only to turn it down on account of wages.
Personally speaking, I think it should be a legal requirement to list the renumeration or a good indicator of salary spread. |  |
| |
| might suit a few on 10:27 - Jun 3 with 1001 views | hype313 |
| might suit a few on 10:25 - Jun 3 by Cheltenham_Blue |
It should be, to save people going through a whole application and interview process only to turn it down on account of wages.
Personally speaking, I think it should be a legal requirement to list the renumeration or a good indicator of salary spread. |
Agreed, and not only to save the applicants time, it would save time for the HR team so they don't have to have to sift through thousands of applications from 20yr old town fans chancing their arm. |  |
| |
| might suit a few on 10:29 - Jun 3 with 984 views | Beckets |
| might suit a few on 10:27 - Jun 3 by hype313 |
Agreed, and not only to save the applicants time, it would save time for the HR team so they don't have to have to sift through thousands of applications from 20yr old town fans chancing their arm. |
Leave Makin out of this! |  | | |
| might suit a few on 10:33 - Jun 3 with 955 views | Cheltenham_Blue |
| might suit a few on 10:29 - Jun 3 by Beckets |
Leave Makin out of this! |
He's 40 isn't he? | |
| |
| might suit a few on 10:35 - Jun 3 with 929 views | JammyDodgerrr |
Just waiting for that job in finance to come up... |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| might suit a few on 10:38 - Jun 3 with 905 views | Wallingford_Boy |
| might suit a few on 10:25 - Jun 3 by Cheltenham_Blue |
It should be, to save people going through a whole application and interview process only to turn it down on account of wages.
Personally speaking, I think it should be a legal requirement to list the renumeration or a good indicator of salary spread. |
The renumeration package tends to come up during the initial stages!
You don't get offered the job and say "btw what does it pay"!! | |
| |
| might suit a few on 10:40 - Jun 3 with 870 views | SomethingBlue |
| might suit a few on 10:10 - Jun 3 by Plums |
No salary listed. Why would anyone even bother applying? |
Fair standard tbh for a high-ish level job. Think they'll be offering a pretty decent package actually. |  |
| |
| might suit a few on 10:43 - Jun 3 with 843 views | hype313 |
| might suit a few on 10:38 - Jun 3 by Wallingford_Boy |
The renumeration package tends to come up during the initial stages!
You don't get offered the job and say "btw what does it pay"!! |
But why would you go through the application process to then find out it's paying half of what your current salary is?
This notion of not stating salary is nonsense to me. | |
| |
| might suit a few on 11:39 - Jun 3 with 681 views | DublinBlue84 |
Makes you wonder what Steve Pearce (media manager) and Dan Palfrey (PR Manager) future is like going forward, although they could well sit under this new appointee. [Post edited 3 Jun 2021 11:40]
| |
| |
| might suit a few on 11:42 - Jun 3 with 662 views | JammyDodgerrr |
| might suit a few on 10:43 - Jun 3 by hype313 |
But why would you go through the application process to then find out it's paying half of what your current salary is?
This notion of not stating salary is nonsense to me. |
It's like jobs being listed by agencies. I hate they never disclose on the advert who it is for - why the secrecy? I would like to know who I am applying for! | |
| |
| might suit a few on 11:43 - Jun 3 with 652 views | 66notout |
| might suit a few on 10:25 - Jun 3 by Cheltenham_Blue |
It should be, to save people going through a whole application and interview process only to turn it down on account of wages.
Personally speaking, I think it should be a legal requirement to list the renumeration or a good indicator of salary spread. |
remuneration | | | |
| might suit a few on 11:49 - Jun 3 with 624 views | Wallingford_Boy |
| might suit a few on 10:43 - Jun 3 by hype313 |
But why would you go through the application process to then find out it's paying half of what your current salary is?
This notion of not stating salary is nonsense to me. |
If you are applying for a senior role, you are going to know ROUGHLY what it pays, that will not make a huge difference to whether you are interested in the role or not.
More junior roles will tend to display salary, as it matters more when you are in the earlier stages of your career. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
