Forum | Hope this means Humphreys moves up pecking order (n/t) by cbower

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Hope this means Humphreys moves up pecking order (n/t) 18:15 - Aug 24 with 961 views

cbower

bluescouser

Hope this means Humphreys moves up pecking order (n/t) on 18:18 - Aug 24 with 944 views

Kieran_Knows

Hopefully!

Poll:

We’ve got super KM, he knows exactly what we need. Woolfie at the back…

Hope this means Humphreys moves up pecking order (n/t) on 18:32 - Aug 24 with 876 views

Daninthecampo

Just Ball and him who can play Central so you'd think so

Hope this means Humphreys moves up pecking order (n/t) on 18:33 - Aug 24 with 875 views

cressi

Hope this means Humphreys moves up pecking order (n/t) on 18:18 - Aug 24 by Kieran_Knows
Hopefully!

Also don't take a squad place due to age.

Hope this means Humphreys moves up pecking order (n/t) on 18:45 - Aug 24 with 821 views

ITFC_Forever

No-one ahead of him has left, so no, I don’t think so.

	P 1162, W 506, D 298, L 358, F 1749, A 1435 92/92
Blog:	Confessions of a Statto - Why We Bother

Hope this means Humphreys moves up pecking order (n/t) on 21:50 - Aug 24 with 572 views

Nthsuffolkblue

Hope this means Humphreys moves up pecking order (n/t) on 18:45 - Aug 24 by ITFC_Forever
No-one ahead of him has left, so no, I don’t think so.

Was my initial thought but Harper did make the bench against Bolton while Humphreys didn't. Humphreys did get more minutes than Harper against Col U and I did think that might have seen him move ahead of Harper.

Poll:	How do you feel about the re-election of Trump?
Blog:	[Blog] Ghostbusters

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread