| Hladky will have to step up. 12:46 - Jul 25 with 2063 views | kiwiblue |
Burnley about to sell Trafford......27m......
Perhaps a sale for town to replace him? |  | | |  |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 12:48 - Jul 25 with 2006 views | positivity |
they bought a new keeper for 5m in the summer; hladky still won't be first choice |  |
| |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 12:56 - Jul 25 with 1916 views | Blaggers12 |
Muric is going back to Turf Moor. | | | |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 13:00 - Jul 25 with 1833 views | howdonblue |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 12:56 - Jul 25 by Blaggers12 |
Muric is going back to Turf Moor. |
🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞 |  | | |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 13:09 - Jul 25 with 1725 views | Matt_Netherlands |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 12:56 - Jul 25 by Blaggers12 |
Muric is going back to Turf Moor. |
Does he need a lift? |  | | |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 13:12 - Jul 25 with 1687 views | victorysquad |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 12:56 - Jul 25 by Blaggers12 |
Muric is going back to Turf Moor. |
we should keep him imo | |
| |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 13:20 - Jul 25 with 1596 views | Blaggers12 |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 13:09 - Jul 25 by Matt_Netherlands |
Does he need a lift? |
Well he certainly won’t be driving there himself for a while… | | | |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 13:39 - Jul 25 with 1409 views | HighgateBlue |
In my view, selling clubs should not be able to insert re-purchase or matching rights into sales contracts. What next, a clause banning a player from playing against their former club? When you sell a player, that should be it, in terms of their services. I'm fine with sell-on clauses, because it allows a smaller club to benefit from the huge increase in value of a player whom they've developed in the first place.
But retaining essentially proprietory rights over another team's player should be banned in the same way as having a stake in another team is also banned. |  | | |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 14:09 - Jul 25 with 1207 views | hunty21 |
What is don't understand is the clause was 40m so how have they agreed 27m | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Hladky will have to step up. on 14:14 - Jul 25 with 1150 views | Metal_Hacker |
He had bloody good feet that bloke …just saying |  |
| |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 14:15 - Jul 25 with 1145 views | Mediocre_Quick |
They can have Muric back, for what we paid for him |  | | |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 18:49 - Jul 25 with 787 views | Mark |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 13:39 - Jul 25 by HighgateBlue |
In my view, selling clubs should not be able to insert re-purchase or matching rights into sales contracts. What next, a clause banning a player from playing against their former club? When you sell a player, that should be it, in terms of their services. I'm fine with sell-on clauses, because it allows a smaller club to benefit from the huge increase in value of a player whom they've developed in the first place.
But retaining essentially proprietory rights over another team's player should be banned in the same way as having a stake in another team is also banned. |
I agree this should be looked at, as big clubs are effectively holding onto rights over the player and capping the profit smaller clubs can make. |  | | |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 18:55 - Jul 25 with 761 views | tonybied |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 14:09 - Jul 25 by hunty21 |
What is don't understand is the clause was 40m so how have they agreed 27m |
A club can still choose to sell lower than a clause, they just don't have to. Once the clause is met, the club have no choice in the matter. |  | | |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 20:30 - Jul 25 with 573 views | Nutkins_Return |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 18:55 - Jul 25 by tonybied |
A club can still choose to sell lower than a clause, they just don't have to. Once the clause is met, the club have no choice in the matter. |
They also had a matched clause and that is what this was. Newcastle were in at £27mil.
On Hladky he probably needs to move to play. | |
| |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 22:21 - Jul 25 with 439 views | Nthsuffolkblue |
| Hladky will have to step up. on 20:30 - Jul 25 by Nutkins_Return |
They also had a matched clause and that is what this was. Newcastle were in at £27mil.
On Hladky he probably needs to move to play. |
I wondered why reports said they had met the clause and got him below the clause price.
That explains it, thanks. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
