Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum
Reply
Homophobia and banning
at 16:20 19 Oct 2021

Ffs.
Forum
Reply
One rule for us etc. #48732
at 16:16 19 Oct 2021

It's really quite something isn't it? I honestly wonder what Johnson would have to do for the country to care. At this point he could video himself cock slapping the Queen and people would just shrug and say "What did you expect? He's a character". We've reached a point where the public just have no expectations at all of the PM. Standards in public life are, by some distance, the lowest they've ever been.
Forum
Reply
Harassment allegations - advice?
at 16:01 19 Oct 2021

When you go and speak to the fuzz they might have a few questions about you inciting public disorder at this rate.
Forum
Reply
One rule for us etc. #48732
at 16:00 19 Oct 2021

Bit more on this here: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/oct/18/nimco-ali-christmas-stay-boris-

At best they are stretching the word of the rules to their absolute limit to suggest they didn't break them, at worst they're just taking the piss. Either way it doesn't seem to be in the spirit of the rules that were in place at the time and that meant most of us didn't get to see those close to us at Christmas.

Seems nobody really cares anymore though. It's almost like we expect Johnson to not behave with honesty and decency so we just shrug our shoulders when he doesn't. What a state to get ourselves into.
Forum
Reply
Homophobia and banning
at 15:24 19 Oct 2021

I struggle with reading your posts on current threads, let alone going back through old ones. Likewise though, my post did not accuse the poster of being homophobic. I merely pointed out he voted for someone who has made homophobic remarks, which is essentially what you did to Joe previously.
Forum
Reply
Harassment allegations - advice?
at 14:58 19 Oct 2021

You've got stones, I'll give you that at least. Still either clueless or deliberately misrepresenting the debate, or likely a little of both, but you've got stones.
Forum
Reply
Anyone with Shell Energy?
at 14:33 19 Oct 2021

I was with them before and they were fine, I didn't encounter any problems. They bought out a green energy firm that I'd originally signed up to and even though I was on a green tariff I binned them off at the first opportunity because they are Shell and make most of their money in fossil fuels.
Forum
Reply
We have 34 games remaining, and we've scored 23 goals
at 14:29 19 Oct 2021

Well observed! I failed reading and comprehension it seems.
Forum
Reply
Homophobia and banning
at 14:28 19 Oct 2021

Mind that ditch when you swerve, Glassers.
Forum
Reply
Harassment allegations - advice?
at 14:25 19 Oct 2021

Bringing the views of Priti Patel into it doesn't do much for your argument, mate. She says whatever plays well to the base, she doesn't believe any of it. She was the best friend of the Met when they followed her orders to heavy handedly deal with the Sarah Everard vigil. Now she's realised most of the public actually condemn violence against women she's gone the other way.
Forum
Reply
Homophobia and banning
at 12:55 19 Oct 2021

Nice wriggling, but I see little difference in what I've said on this thread to what you've said in the past. I merely pointed out that the poster in question voted for someone with a history of making homophobic comments. That's no different to your post to Joe.
Forum
Reply
Harassment allegations - advice?
at 12:47 19 Oct 2021

Absolutely, don't listen to me and don't listen to this TooManyCooks chancer either. Definitely ignore Chico.
Forum
Reply
Homophobia and banning
at 12:21 19 Oct 2021

So we can conclude from this that it's okay to blame people for who they voted for but only if they voted Labour?
Forum
Reply
Harassment allegations - advice?
at 12:18 19 Oct 2021

Bit of an overreaction? I've had a look at PACE and it only discusses rights to free legal advice in the context of interview under caution (whether voluntary or under arrest) and the HSE guidance is similarly based on PACE. You have provided one link, which is somewhat ambiguous in terms of what is meant by an 'interview'. I'd accept your pompous tone if you hadn't got various other things wrong - such as getting interview under caution and being under arrest mixed up - but frankly it looks to me like you're masquerading as an expert and that's potentially dangerous.
[Post edited 19 Oct 12:20]
Forum
Reply
Harassment allegations - advice?
at 12:15 19 Oct 2021

In that case I'm not even sure we disagree. I know that the police can try to obfuscate and make you feel like it's just a chat when actually it is a formal interview, but if they caution you - which they have to if they're recording the conversation and want to use it as evidence down the line - then absolutely you should request the duty solicitor that you're entitled to.
Forum
Reply
We have 34 games remaining, and we've scored 23 goals
at 11:59 19 Oct 2021

I'm not sure how you got more than that in your O level if you think 66.66% of 3 is more than 2. The more than is crucial here, 2 points per game will likely see us 4th at best.
Forum
Reply
Harassment allegations - advice?
at 11:55 19 Oct 2021

You don't have to be arrested to be interviewed under caution and if you say something when not under caution it is not admissible as evidence. Are you sure you're an expert on this? Because some of what you're saying isn't correct.
[Post edited 19 Oct 12:08]
Forum
Reply
Harassment allegations - advice?
at 11:53 19 Oct 2021

According to this guidance (see para 21) the kind of interview referred to in the advice you provided would be an interview under caution: https://www.hse.gov.uk/enforce/enforcementguide/investigation/witness-questionin

Clearly there's a case that for protection of all parties that when you have been accused of something you should only be spoken to under caution but it doesn't seem clear that an informal chat without being under caution qualifies you for free legal advice.
[Post edited 19 Oct 12:19]
Forum
Reply
We have 34 games remaining, and we've scored 23 goals
at 11:23 19 Oct 2021

We need more than 2 points a game. 2 points a game only takes us to 82 points, which won't be enough for automatic promotion.
Forum
Reply
Harassment allegations - advice?
at 11:21 19 Oct 2021

Is it really that hard for you to provide a source then, given that you are definitively correct it shouldn't be too hard? None of us know what your credentials are, I'm happy to be proven wrong but some actual evidence that what you're saying is correct would be useful. That would be a lot more helpful than putting certain words in caps to try and assure us of your credibility.
[Post edited 19 Oct 11:22]
Please log in to use all the site's facilities

Herbivore


Site Scores

Forum Votes: 21765
Comment Votes: 8
Prediction League: 0
TOTAL: 21773
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© TWTD 1995-2021