| Should he be sacked for this? 10:09 - May 27 with 3670 views | BryanPlug |
[content removed at the owner's request] |  |
| |  |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 13:57 - May 27 with 892 views | Marshalls_Mullet |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 13:53 - May 27 by monytowbray |
"democratically elected" has become an oxymoron in this country. |
Not sure it's become an oxymoron. Maybe it always has been. |  |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:09 - May 27 with 876 views | BlueBadger |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 13:46 - May 27 by SpruceMoose |
Arf! Imagine actually thinking that this is a good post! |
It's not quite 'yes but the Fabian society liked eugenics' as a 'but Labour' but it's not far off, is it? |  |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:20 - May 27 with 866 views | BlueBadger |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:09 - May 27 by BlueBadger |
It's not quite 'yes but the Fabian society liked eugenics' as a 'but Labour' but it's not far off, is it? |
Oh Gazzer, you and your downvotes. Someone as proudly non-PC as you should be able to handle some bantz, surely? | |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:21 - May 27 with 863 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 13:00 - May 27 by gazzer1999 |
So are you saying 20 years ago it was ok to black your face? Footers its NEVER been ok to do that. |
Not quite up there with child abuse, rape and sex with dead people is it?! |  |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:22 - May 27 with 862 views | footers |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:20 - May 27 by BlueBadger |
Oh Gazzer, you and your downvotes. Someone as proudly non-PC as you should be able to handle some bantz, surely? |
To be fair, I just went back and downvoted your obvious lie about your involvement with the Morris men. |  |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:23 - May 27 with 855 views | BryanPlug |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 11:51 - May 27 by BrixtonBlue |
Why on earth is this a story now, 20 years after it happened?! |
[content removed at owner's request] | |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:24 - May 27 with 853 views | footers |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:21 - May 27 by BrixtonBlue |
Not quite up there with child abuse, rape and sex with dead people is it?! |
Depends if the paedophile was wearing blackface I guess. | |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:26 - May 27 with 844 views | gazzer1999 |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:20 - May 27 by BlueBadger |
Oh Gazzer, you and your downvotes. Someone as proudly non-PC as you should be able to handle some bantz, surely? |
Sorry have I missed something, where have I said I am proudly non-pc. If only you knew the truth, carry on making it up. It I repeat has Never been acceptable to black your face up, or to joke about it.
With regard to downvotes where? |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:27 - May 27 with 844 views | BrixtonBlue |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:23 - May 27 by BryanPlug |
[content removed at owner's request] |
Oh I quite agree it wasn't right in 2000. Which makes it even more baffling that it wasn't reported as such in 2000.
It reeks of someone digging dirt, though I'm not sure why you'd feel the need to discredit a comedian 20 years after the event. [Post edited 27 May 2020 14:27]
| |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:29 - May 27 with 830 views | footers |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:27 - May 27 by BrixtonBlue |
Oh I quite agree it wasn't right in 2000. Which makes it even more baffling that it wasn't reported as such in 2000.
It reeks of someone digging dirt, though I'm not sure why you'd feel the need to discredit a comedian 20 years after the event. [Post edited 27 May 2020 14:27]
|
Because Fallon's fairly left-leaning and anti-Trump I guess. Probably dug up the same way the Trudeau pictures were. Not that it's an excuse, of course, but funny timing and targets. | |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:29 - May 27 with 824 views | BlueBadger |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:26 - May 27 by gazzer1999 |
Sorry have I missed something, where have I said I am proudly non-pc. If only you knew the truth, carry on making it up. It I repeat has Never been acceptable to black your face up, or to joke about it.
With regard to downvotes where? |
Your downvotes on all my posts taking the piss out of your 'yes but Jimmy saville' ramblings. Plus, you voted 'leave' and love Boris, I was assuming you were cool with bantz and edgy conversation. | |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:37 - May 27 with 805 views | SpruceMoose |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:26 - May 27 by gazzer1999 |
Sorry have I missed something, where have I said I am proudly non-pc. If only you knew the truth, carry on making it up. It I repeat has Never been acceptable to black your face up, or to joke about it.
With regard to downvotes where? |
Reading your posts over the months and years has been like watching a rather ungainly man slipping, sliding and falling on a banana skin, all in slow motion. |  |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:40 - May 27 with 792 views | gazzer1999 |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:29 - May 27 by BlueBadger |
Your downvotes on all my posts taking the piss out of your 'yes but Jimmy saville' ramblings. Plus, you voted 'leave' and love Boris, I was assuming you were cool with bantz and edgy conversation. |
I was merely making a comparison with Saville to make a point that it was never ok to black up. Sorry if it offended your friend footers, he did answer by the way. Did I vote leave?, did I vote Boris?, no I am not cool with 'bantz' and 'edgy conversation' as it usually leads to bullying and ganging up. I would have thought someone in your occupation would be understand that, and is totally unacceptable behaviour. I got 3 down votes for asking a question I wonder who the 3 could be?, maybe you can tell me as you obviously have access to that information. | | | |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:41 - May 27 with 789 views | SpruceMoose |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:40 - May 27 by gazzer1999 |
I was merely making a comparison with Saville to make a point that it was never ok to black up. Sorry if it offended your friend footers, he did answer by the way. Did I vote leave?, did I vote Boris?, no I am not cool with 'bantz' and 'edgy conversation' as it usually leads to bullying and ganging up. I would have thought someone in your occupation would be understand that, and is totally unacceptable behaviour. I got 3 down votes for asking a question I wonder who the 3 could be?, maybe you can tell me as you obviously have access to that information. |
I just checked and it was Phil, Gav and Benters. | |
| Pronouns: He/Him/His.
"Imagine being a heterosexual white male in Britain at this moment. How bad is that. Everything you say is racist, everything you say is homophobic. The Woke community have really f****d this country." | | Poll: | Selectamod |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:52 - May 27 with 764 views | BlueBadger |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:27 - May 27 by BrixtonBlue |
Oh I quite agree it wasn't right in 2000. Which makes it even more baffling that it wasn't reported as such in 2000.
It reeks of someone digging dirt, though I'm not sure why you'd feel the need to discredit a comedian 20 years after the event. [Post edited 27 May 2020 14:27]
|
It's a new-ish alt-right tactic to 'discredit' their critics, 'you can't call us nazis, you once did something a bit iffy a few years ago then apologised for it and didn't do it again'.
It's a marginally more sophisticated version of 'but Labour'. [Post edited 27 May 2020 15:22]
| |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 16:08 - May 27 with 731 views | BlueBadger |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 14:24 - May 27 by footers |
Depends if the paedophile was wearing blackface I guess. |
In all fairness, Saville DID look like he'd burgled MR T with all that jewellery he had... | |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 16:11 - May 27 with 726 views | monytowbray |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 13:57 - May 27 by Marshalls_Mullet |
Not sure it's become an oxymoron. Maybe it always has been. |
Maybe. But it’s worse now when Russia interfere with our elections, promises are never kept, laws are broken and no one is held accountable.
Plus Dominic Cummings has never been voted into No. 10 yet seems to be the actual Prime Minister. |  |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 22:25 - May 27 with 661 views | BryanPlug |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 16:08 - May 27 by BlueBadger |
In all fairness, Saville DID look like he'd burgled MR T with all that jewellery he had... |
[content removed at owner's request] | |
| |
| Should he be sacked for this? on 22:53 - May 27 with 646 views | Randall |
I think it should make a difference that it was a very good impression (clearly he was a big fan of Chris Rock) rather than a nasty caricature.
Obviously could not do it these days.
Reminded me a bit of the kid who dressed up as Diouf. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
